Skip to main content
Log in

Letting a little nonverbal air into the room: Insights from acceptance and commitment therapy Part 1: Philosophical and theoretical underpinnings

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, a new “wave” of mindfulness based Cognitive Behavior Therapies (CBT) has become popular. Such approaches include Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT; Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behaviour change. New York: Guilford Press, 1999), Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Depression (Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press, 2002), and Mindfulness-based Stress Management (Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell Publishing, 1990). In contrast to traditional CBT, these approaches often minimize attempts to change the form and frequency of dysfunctional thoughts. Is there any way to integrate traditional CBT with mindfulness based CBT? To answer this question, we discuss the philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of one form of traditional CBT (Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and one form of mindfulness based CBT (ACT). We argue that some aspects of each therapy can be integrated. However, in order to prevent techniques from being used haphazardly or inconsistently, we suggest that the different forms of CBT need to be driven by a common philosophical orientation (e.g., functional contextualism) and theoretical orientation (e.g., Relational Frame Theory).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. E.,& Jacobson, N. S. (1996). Reasons for depression and the process and outcome of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1417–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (Vol. xiv, 338 pp.). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press

  • Blackledge, J. T. (2003). An introduction to relational frame theory: Basics and applications. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3(4), 421–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1057–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J., Scott, G., Deane, F. P., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2003). Relations between social and emotional competence and mental health: A construct validation study. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 1947–1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J., & West, M. (2004). Relationships between dysfunctional beliefs and positive and negative indices of well-being: A critical evaluation of the Common Beliefs Survey-III. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 22(3), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, 54(10), 821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson K. S. (1989). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 57(3), 414–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2001). Reason to change: A Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) workbook (Vol. xii, 246 pp.). New York, NY, US: Brunner-Routledge

  • Ellis, A. (1990). Is rational-emotive therapy (ret) “rationalist” or “constructivist.” Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 8, 169–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2001). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (421 pp.). Amherst, NY, US: Prometheus Books

  • Feldner, M., Zvolensky, M., Eifert G., & Spira, A. (2003). Emotional avoidance: An experimental test of individual differences and response suppression using biological challenge. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 41(4), 403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaga D. A., & Davison, G. C. (1993). An appraisal of rational-emotive therapy. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajzler, D. J., & Bernard, M. E. (1991). A review of rational-emotive education outcome studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 6(1), 27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1995). Why cognitions are not causes. The Behavior Therapist, 18, 59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 639–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

  • Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Haas, J. R., & Greenway, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(2), 137–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., Bissett, R., Luoma, J., & Guerrero, L. F. (2004). DBT, FAP, and ACT: How empirically oriented are the new behavior therapy technologies? Behavior Therapy, 35, 35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change (Vol. xvi, 304 pp.). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Wilson K. G. (1995). The role of cognition in complex human behavior: A contextualistic perspective. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 26(3), 241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. W., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Emotional avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule-following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (Vol. xix, pp. 191–220, 391 pp.)

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapleau, P. (1989). The three pillars of Zen: Teaching, practice, and enlightenment. New York: Anchor

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity. An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics (798 pp.). Lancaster, PA: International Non-Aristotelian Library Publ. Co

  • Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder (Vol. xvii, 558 pp.). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Stress inoculation training. New York: Pergamon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G. (1992). The pursuit of happiness: Who is happy and why. New York: William Morrow and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Neenan, M., & Dryden, W. (2002). Cognitive behaviour therapy: An A–Z of persuasive arguments. London: Whurr Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67(1), 92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinksy, D. E., & Howard K. I. (1986). Process and outcome of psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield, & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 311–383). New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 60(2), 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., & Williams, J. M. G., Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression : A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the Anger Rumination Scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 31(5), 689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, G. L., Parker, J. D., & Barnes, G. S. (1992). The Common Beliefs Survey III and its subscales: Discriminant validity in clinical and nonclinical subjects. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 10(2), 95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, G. L., Walter, M. I., Kingery, L. R., & Nay, W. T. (2001). The Common Beliefs Survey-III and the Situational Self-Statement and Affective State Inventory: Test-rest reliability, internal consistency, and further psychometric considerations. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 19(2), 89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, D. J., Forman, M. A., Rudy, D. R., & Murphy, M. A. (1986). Factor analysis of the Common Beliefs Survey III: A replication study. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 404–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walen, S. R., DiGiuseppe, R., & Dryden, W. (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: The University of Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62(4), 615–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, A. (2000). Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS). In: K. Corcoran, & J. Fischer (Eds.), Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol. 2, pp. 187–190). New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 59–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(2), 125–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Ciarrochi.

Additional information

Address correspondence to Joseph Ciarrochi, Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ciarrochi, J., Robb, H. & Godsell, C. Letting a little nonverbal air into the room: Insights from acceptance and commitment therapy Part 1: Philosophical and theoretical underpinnings. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 23, 79–106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0005-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0005-y

Keywords

Navigation