Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Family and Work-Related Social Support on Musculoskeletal Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Social support has been identified as a key factor in facilitating better health outcomes following injury. However, there is limited research on the role of social support in recovery from musculoskeletal injury (MSI), the leading cause of morbidity and disability in the world. The aim of this study is to review the extent to which family and work-related social support (e.g. co-workers, supervisors) has been identified as a factor in the outcomes (physical, psychological, economic) of individuals with MSI. Methods Eight online databases were searched for observational studies reporting findings on family and work-related social support in populations with MSI. Data extraction, quality assessment and a systematic critical synthesis were carried out on included studies. Results Fourteen relevant articles were identified. The majority of the studies focused on social support from co-workers or supervisors (n = 11), while three studies focused on social support from the family. Overall, the evidence for the relation between work-related support and MSI outcomes was inconclusive. Similarly, there was limited and inconclusive evidence to demonstrate a relationship between family support and MSI outcomes. Conclusions The results of this review are inconclusive. Further research is needed to understand the role of social support in rehabilitation efforts following MSI. Recommendations for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organisation. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Geneva: World Health Organisation. WHO Technical Report Series 919; 2003.

  3. Akesson K, Woolf AD. Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Br Med J. 2001;322(7294):1079–1080.

  4. Victorian Injury Surveillance Unit (VISU). Data request: hospital admissions and emergency department presentations following a musculoskeletal injury in Victoria Australia 2011/12; 2013.

  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health system expenditure on disease and injury in Australia, 2004–05. Canberra: AIHW; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000–2010. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59(2):81–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646–56.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Langley J, Derrett S, Davie G, Ameratunga S, Wyeth E. A cohort study of short-term functional outcomes following injury: the role of pre-injury socio-demographic and health characteristics, injury and injury-related healthcare. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rebbeck T, Sindhusake D, Cameron ID, Rubin G, Feyer A-M, Walsh J, et al. A prospective cohort study of health outcomes following whiplash associated disorders in an Australian population. Injury Prev. 2006;12(2):93–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dembe AE. The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):403–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keogh JP, Nuwayhid I, Gordon JL, Gucer PW. The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. Am J Ind Med. 2000;38(5):498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulz R, Sherwood P. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am J Nurs. 2008;108(9):23–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosny A, Lifshen M, Pugliese D, Majesky G, Kramer D, Steenstra I, et al. Buddies in bad times? The role of co-workers after a work-related injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):438–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):169–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Donnell M, Varker T, Holmes A, Ellen S, Wade D, Creamer M, et al. Disability after injury: the cumulative burden of physical and mental health. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(2):137–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nederhand MJ, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ, Turk DC, Zilvold G. Chronic neck pain disability due to an acute whiplash injury. Pain. 2003;102(1–2):63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(5):E109–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasenbring M, Hallner D, Klasen B. Psychological mechanisms in the transition from acute to chronic pain: over-or underrated? Schmerz (Berlin, Germany). 2001;15(6):442–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Young Casey C, Greenberg MA, Nicassio PM, Harpin RE, Hubbard D. Transition from acute to chronic pain and disability: a model including cognitive, affective, and trauma factors. Pain. 2008;134(1):69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barth J, Schneider S, von Känel R. Lack of social support in the etiology and the prognosis of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(3):229–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosland A-M, Heisler M, Piette J. The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2012;35(2):221–39.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Müller R, Peter C, Cieza A, Geyh S. The role of social support and social skills in people with spinal cord injury—a systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2011;50(2):94–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen S, Wills T. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976;38(5):300–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health-related functions of social support. J Behav Med. 1981;4(4):381–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh community health study. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116(1):123–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamison RN, Virts KL. The influence of family support on chronic pain. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(4):283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Post MWM, Ros WJG, Schrijvers AJP. Impact of social support on health status and life satisfaction in people with a spinal cord injury. Psychol Health. 1999;14(4):679–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):374–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mielenz TJ, Garrett JM, Carey TS. Association of psychosocial work characteristics with low back pain outcomes. Spine. 2008;33(11):1270–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van den Heuvel SG, Ariens GAM, Boshuizen HC, Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors related to recurrent low-back pain and sickness absence. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(6):459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Croezen S, Picavet HS, Haveman-Nies A, Verschuren WM, de Groot L, van’t Veer P. Do positive or negative experiences of social support relate to current and future health? Results from the Doetinchem cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turk DC, Kerns RD, Rosenberg R. Effects of marital interaction on chronic pain and disability: examining the down side of social support. Rehabil Psychol. 1992;37(4):259–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kwan O, Friel J. Clinical relevance of the sick role and secondary gain in the treatment of disability syndromes. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59(2):129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Haldeman S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2009;2(2 Suppl):S87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S, Dunn KM. The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(2):119–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Dunn KM. The influence of informal social support on risk and prognosis in spinal pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(5):444.e1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Laisne F, Lecomte C, Corbiere M. Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature (corrected and republished). Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1912–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41(8):787–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):9–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scholten-Peeters GGM, Verhagen AP, Bekkering GE, van der Windt DAWM, Barnsley L, Oostendorp RAB, et al. Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain. 2003;104(1–2):303–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Meloche GR, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, et al. Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine. 2002;27(23):2720–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, et al. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004;107(1–2):77–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fransen M, Woodward M, Norton R, Coggan C, Dawe M, Sheridan N. Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain. Spine. 2002;27(1):92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Soucy I, Truchon M, Côté D. Work-related factors contributing to chronic disability in low back pain. Work J Prev Assess Rehabil. 2006;26(3):313–26.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bonde J, Mikkelsen S, Andersen J, Fallentin N, Baelum J, Svendsen S, et al. Prognosis of shoulder tendonitis in repetitive work: a follow up study in a cohort of Danish industrial and service workers. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(9):E8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Côté P. It pays to be nice: employer–worker relationships and the management of back pain claims. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(2):214–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gheldof EL, Vinck J, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, Crombez G. Development of and recovery from short- and long-term low back pain in occupational settings: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(8):841–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Holtedahl R, Veiersted KB. Physical, social and emotional function after work accidents: a medicolegal perspective. Work. 2007;28(4):363–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee GK, Chan F, Berven NL. Factors affecting depression among people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a structural equation model. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(1):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Lehmann KK. Predicting long-term disability in low back injured workers presenting to a spine consultant. Spine. 1993;18(8):1103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Reme S, Shaw W, Steenstra I, Woiszwillo M, Pransky G, Linton S. Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):541–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Crook J, Moldofsky H, Shannon H. Determinants of disability after a work related musculoskeletal injury. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(8):1570–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kemmlert K, Orelius-Dallner M, Kilbom A, Gamberale F. A three-year follow-up of 195 reported occupational over-exertion injuries. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1993;25(1):16–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tubach F, Leclerc A, Landre M, Pietri-Taleb F. Risk factors for sick leave due to low back pain: a prospective study. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(5):451–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Ariëns GAM, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(5):323–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3(4):322–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Karasek R, Theorell T. Health work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of work life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Faucette JA, Levine JD. The contributions of interpersonal conflict to chronic pain in the presence or absence of organic pathology. Pain. 1991;44:35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: Wiley; 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Mallen C, Peat G, Croft P. Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(8):765–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a scholarship from the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR). The authors wish to thank Kaye Lasserre for advice on the search strategy and for assistance with Endnote.

Ethical standard

No animal or human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khic-Houy Prang.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Medline and Embase search strategy

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 Checklist for measuring study quality

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prang, KH., Newnam, S. & Berecki-Gisolf, J. The Impact of Family and Work-Related Social Support on Musculoskeletal Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil 25, 207–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9523-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9523-8

Keywords

Navigation