Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Spanish Spoken in Spain

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ) is a tool developed in the United States to measure work disability and assess the perceived impact of health problems on worker ability to perform jobs. We translated and adapted the WRFQ to Spanish spoken in Spain and assessed preservation of its psychometric properties. Methods Cross-cultural adaptation of the WRFQ was performed following a systematic 5-step procedure: (1) direct translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back-translation, (4) consolidation by an expert committee and (5) pre-test. Psychometric properties were evaluated by administering the questionnaire to 40 patients with different cultural levels and health problems. Applicability, usability, readability and integrity of the WRFQ were assessed, together with its validity and reliability. Results Questionnaire translation, back translation and consolidation were carried out without relevant difficulties. Idiomatic issues requiring reformulation were found in the instructions, response options and in 2 items. Participants appreciated the applicability, usability, readability and integrity of the questionnaire. The results indicated good face and content validity. Internal consistency was satisfactory for all subscales (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.88 and 0.96), except for social demands (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.56). Test–retest reliability showed good stability, with intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.77 and 0.93 for all subscales. Construct validity was considered preserved based on the comparison of median scores for each patient group and subscale. Conclusions Our results indicate the cross-cultural adaptation of the WRFQ to Spanish was satisfactory and preserved its psychometric properties, except for the subscale of social demands, whose internal consistency should be interpreted with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brault MW, Hootman J, Helmick CG, Theis KA, Armour BS. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults-United States, 2005. MMWR 2009; 58:421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rice DP, LaPlante MP. Medical expenditures for disability and disabling comorbidity. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:739–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dupré D, Karjalainen A (2003) Eurostat, statistics in focus: Employment of disabled people in Europe in 2002, Eurostat theme 3: population and social conditions. Available from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NK-03-026/EN/KS-NK-03-026-EN.PDF.

  4. Ross D. Ageing and work: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60:169–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hairault JO, Langot F, Sopraseuth T. Distance to retirement and older workers employment: the case for delaying the retirement age. J Eur Economic Assoc. 2010;8:1034–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Macdonald EB, Sanati KA. Occupational health services now and in the future: the need for a paradigm shift. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:1273–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sampere M, Gimeno D, Serra C, Plana M, Martínez JM, Delclos GL, Benavides FG. Organizational return to work support and sick leave duration: a cohort of Spanish workers with a long-term non-work-related sick leave episode. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53:674–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Squires H, Rick J, Carroll C, Hillage J. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees to work following long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34:115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noben CY, Nijhuis FJ, de Rijk AE, Evers SM. Design of a trial-based economic evaluation on the cost-effectiveness of employability interventions among work disabled employees or employees at risk of work disability: the CASE-study. BMC Public Health. 2012;18(12):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amick BC III, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25:3152–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldwin ML, Johnson WG, Butler RJ. The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:632–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerner D, Amick BC 3rd, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:72–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerner DJ, Amick BC 3rd, Malspeis S, Rogers WH. A national survey of health-related worklimitations among employed persons in the United States. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:225–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt LL, Amick BC 3rd, Katz JN, Ellis BB. Evaluation of an upper extremity student-role functioning scale using item response theory. Work. 2002;19:105–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Amick BC 3rd, Shannon HS, McMurtry R, Roth JH, et al. Validity and responsiveness of presenteeism scales in chronic work-related upper-extremity disorders. Phys Ther. 2011;91:254–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Imbeau D, Amick BC III, Loisel P. The cross-cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire in Canadian French. Int J Rehabil. 2004;27:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallasch CH, Alexandre NM, Amick B 3rd. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:701–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abma FI. Amick Iii BC, Brouwer S, van der Klink JJ, Bültmann U. The cross-cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire to Dutch. Work. 2012;43:203–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amick BC III, Habeck RV, Ossmann J, Fossel AH, Keller R, Katz JN. Predictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:490–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, BosiFerraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reports measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24:61–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zanhn C. Cross cultural health outcome assessment: a user’s guide. The Netherlands: ERGHO; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Adaptación cultural de instrumentos utilizados en salud ocupacional. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002;11:109–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanchez-Fernandez P, Aguilar de Armas I, Fentelsaz G, Moreno-Casbas MT, Hidalgo-García R. Fiabilidad de los instrumentos de medición en ciencias de la salud. Enferm Clin. 2005;15:227–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2008.

  28. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Concepción Gómez-Morán, Carlos Enric Delclós, M ª José Román and Cliff Grossman for their professional involvement in the direct and back translation of the WRFQ. Thanks to Julià del Prado, Josefina Pi-Sunyer, Rocío Villar for their kind participation with the translators in the Expert Committee, and Nuria González, Chelo Sancho and Carmen Sánchez for their collaboration in the distribution and collection of questionnaires, all of them staff of the Occupational Health Service, Parc de Salut MAR (OHS PSMAR), Barcelona. Also thanks to Joan Mirabent (OHS PSMAR), Marta Tejero and Gemma Pidemont for their patient and generous collaboration in the recruitment process of patients. Finally, thanks so much to Ram Dulthummon, José Ramada, Borja Ramada and Ángeles Ramada for their generous collaboration creating and assessing the quality of the database. This project has been partially supported by a grant from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS: PI12/02556), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Consol Serra.

Appendix 1: Work Role Functioning Questionnaire adapted to Spanish Spoken into Spain

Appendix 1: Work Role Functioning Questionnaire adapted to Spanish Spoken into Spain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramada, J.M., Serra, C., Amick III, B.C. et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Spanish Spoken in Spain. J Occup Rehabil 23, 566–575 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9420-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9420-6

Keywords

Navigation