Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction The study objectives were to translate and adapt the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ) into the Brazilian Portuguese language and evaluate its reliability in patients experiencing musculoskeletal disorders. Methods The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the internationally recommended methodology, using the following guidelines: translation, back-translation, revision by a committee, and pretest. At first, the questionnaire was independently translated by two bilingual translators, who had Portuguese as their mother language. Subsequently, two other translators whose mother language was English did the back-translation. A committee composed of five specialists revised and compared the translations obtained, developing the final version for pretest application. The pretest was carried out with 30 patients experiencing musculoskeletal disorders. Psychometric properties were evaluated by administering the questionnaire to 105 subjects with musculoskeletal disorders and receiving physical therapy treatment. The reliability was estimated through stability and homogeneity assessment. The construct validity was tested comparing subjects experiencing musculoskeletal disorders to healthy workers. Results The results indicated good content validity and internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.95). Cronbach alpha for each scale was >0.85, except for the social demand scale. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for the test–retest reliability was satisfactory for mental demands (ICC = 0.68) and excellent for the others (0.82–0.91). In relation to the construct validity, the mean score obtained for each scale was lower for physical, work scheduling, and output demands in the subjects with musculoskeletal disorders. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the groups in comparison to work scheduling, physical, and output demands. Conclusions The data showed that the cross-cultural adaptation process was successful and the adapted instrument demonstrated psychometric properties making it reliable to use in Brazilian culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amick BC III, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3152–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walsh IAP, Franco RN, Canetti EEF, Alem MER, Coury HJCG. Capacidade para o trabalho em indivíduos com lesões músculo-esqueléticas crônicas. Revista de Saude Publica. 2004;38(2):149–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Imbeau D, Amick BC III, Loisel P. The cross- cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire in canadian french. Int J Rehabil 2004;27(4):261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerner D, Amick BC III, Lee JC, Rooney T, Rogers WH, Chang H, et al. Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 2003;41(5):649–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amick BC III, Habeck RV, Ossmann J, Fossel AH, Keller R, Katz JN. Predictors of successful work role functioning alter carpal tunnel release surgery. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46(5):490–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross- cultural adaptation of self-reports measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(12):1029–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zanhn C. Cross cultural health outcome assessment: a user’s guide. The Netherlands: ERGHO; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24(2):61–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Adaptacio´n cultural de instrumentos utilizados en salud ocupacional. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pu´blica. 2002;11(2):109–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Reliability and validity. In: Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J, editors. Nursing research: methodos, critical appraisal, and utilization. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. pp. 327–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questinário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Revista Brasileria de Reumatologia. 1999;39(3):143–50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem. 3rd ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dempsey PA, Dempsey AD. Using nursing research: Process, critical evaluation and utilization. Baltimore: Lippincott; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nunnaly JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981. p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hébert F. Les indicateurs de lésions em santé et sécurité au travaiul: analyses par secteur d’activité économique em 1991. Montreaul: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé em santé et sécurité au travail 1996.

  19. Baldwin ML. Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DCM3 study. Ann Rheum Diseases. 2004;63:723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roux CH, Guillemin F, Boini S, Longuetaud F, Arnault N, Hercberg S, et al. Impact of musculoskeletal disorders on quality of life: an inception cohort study. Ann Rheum Diseases 2005;64:606–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kopec JA, Sayre EC. Work-related psychosocial factors and chronic pain: a prospective cohort study in Canadian workers. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46(12):1263–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the foundation founds received from FAPESP and CNPq in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiane Helena Gallasch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallasch, C.H., Alexandre, N.M.C. & Amick, B. Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. J Occup Rehabil 17, 701–711 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9103-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9103-2

Keywords

Navigation