Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Polyol-Based Plasticizer Types and Concentration on the Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Casein Blend Films

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the structural, mechanical, thermal and barrier properties of the polyvinyl alcohol/casein (PVA/CA) films plasticized with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and sorbitol (SOR). The films were prepared by solution casting technique at different loading levels of plasticizers (10-15-20-25%). The mechanical results indicated that PEG and SOR effectively plasticize the PVA/CA film while SOR efficiency was higher than PEG. The addition of plasticizers decreased the tensile strength while the increased elongation at break value of PVA/CA film. The maximum tensile strength was observed in 10% PEG addition as 37.5 MPa. On the other hand, maximum elongation at break value was observed in 15% SOR at 369% that was higher than the un-plasticized film about 58%. The water contact angle measurements showed that all films were hydrophilic structures (32–75°). Also, the water vapour permeability of the un-plasticized film was measured as 6.4 g m−1 s−1 Pa−1 × 10–11. This value decreased with the addition of PEG (5.5 g m−1 s−1 Pa−1 × 10–11) while increasing SOR addition (12.2 g m−1 s−1 Pa−1 × 10–11). The thermal degradation temperature of un-plasticized PVA/CA film was decreased with plasticization. The residual weight of un-plasticized PVA/CA was 12.5 wt. %, which decreased at 4.5 wt. % for PEG-25 and 4.8 wt. % for SOR-20 films. Also, the melting temperature of the films decreased by increasing the content of plasticizers. Melting temperatures of SOR containing films were lower than PEG containing the films. Consequently, un-plasticized and plasticized PVA/CA-based films successfully prepared and analyzed to determine the appropriate plasticizer. All prepared films exhibited acceptable properties for use as food packaging or biobased materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plastic Europe (2019) Plastics-the Facts 2019. Report Available in: https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/market-data

  2. European Bioplastics (2018) Bioplastics Market Development. Berlin, Available in: https://www.europeanbioplastics.org/news/publications/#MarketData

  3. Picchio ML, Ronco LI, Passeggi MCG et al (2018) Poly(n-butyl acrylate)–casein nanocomposites as promising candidates for packaging films. J Polym Environ 26:2579–2587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Audic J-L, Chaufer B (2012) Properties of biodegradable poly(butylene adipate-co-terephtalate) and sodium caseinate blends. J Appl Polym Sci 125:E459–E467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arvanitoyannis IS, Tserkezou P (2008) Waste treatment management: treatment methodologies of foods of animal origin. In: Arvanitoyannis IS (ed) Waste management for the food industries, 1st edn. Elsevier, USA, pp 801–844

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ryder K, Ali MA, Carne A, Billakanti J (2017) The potential use of dairy by-products for the production of nonfood biomaterials. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:621–642

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siroěić AP, Krehula LK, Kataněić Z, Hrnjak-Murgić Z (2016) Characterization of casein fractions–comparison of commercial casein and casein extracted from cow’s milk. Chem Biochem Eng Q J 30:501–509

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen H, Wang J, Cheng Y et al (2019) Application of protein-based films and coatings for food packaging: a review. Polymers (Basel) 11:2039

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calva-Estrada SJ, Jiménez-Fernández M, Lugo-Cervantes E (2019) Protein-based films: advances in the development of biomaterials applicable to food packaging. Food Eng Rev 11:78–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen H (2002) Formation and properties of casein films and coatings. In: Gennadios A (ed) Protein-based films and coatings, 1st edn. CRC Press, USA, pp 181–209

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biranje S, Madiwale P (2019) Porous electrospun casein / PVA nanofibrous mat for its potential application as wound dressing material. J Porous Mater 26:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aloui H, Baraket K, Sendon R et al (2019) Development and characterization of novel composite glycerol-plasticized films based on sodium caseinate and lipid fraction of tomato pomace by-product. Int J Biol Macromol 139:128–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonnaillie LM, Zhang H, Akkurt S et al (2014) Casein films: the effects of formulation, environmental conditions and the addition of citric pectin on the structure and mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel) 6:2018–2036

    Google Scholar 

  14. Audic J-L, Chaufer B (2005) Influence of plasticizers and crosslinking on the properties of biodegradable films made from sodium caseinate. Eur Polym J 41:1934–1942

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Colak BY, Gouanve F, Degraeve P et al (2015) Study of the influences of film processing conditions and glycerol amount on the water sorption and gas barrier properties of novel sodium caseinate films. J Memb Sci 478:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siew DCW, Heilmann C, Easteal AJ, Cooney RP (1999) Solution and film properties of sodium caseinate/glycerol and sodium caseinate/polyethylene glycol edible coating systems. J Agric Food Chem 47:3432–3440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chick J, Ustunol Z (2006) Mechanical and barrier properties of lactic acid and rennet precipitated casein-based edible films. J Food Sci 63:1024–1027

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chevalier E, Assezat G, Prochazka F, Oulahal N (2018) Development and characterization of a novel edible extruded sheet based on different casein sources and influence of the glycerol concentration. Food Hydrocoll 75:182–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin HC, Wang BJ, Weng YM (2020) Development and characterization of sodium caseinate edible films cross-linked with genipin. Lwt Food Sci Technol 118:108813

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bajpai SK, Bajpai M, Shah FF (2016) Alginate dialdehyde (AD)-crosslinked casein films: Synthesis, characterization and water absorption behavior. Des Monomers Polym 19:406–419

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rai S, Poonia A (2019) Formulation and characterization of edible films from pea starch and casein. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 8:317–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Durmaz BU, Aytac A (2019) Poly (vinyl alcohol) and casein films: the effects of glycerol amount on the properties of films. Res Eng Struct Mater 5:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  23. Durmaz BU, Aytac A (2019) Development and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol) and casein blend films. Polym Int 68:1140–1145

    Google Scholar 

  24. Biswas A, Cheng HN, Evangelista R et al (2020) Evaluation of composite films containing poly(vinyl alcohol) and cotton gin trash. J Polym Environ 28:1998–2007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lara BRB, Araújo ACMA, Dias MV et al (2019) Morphological, mechanical and physical properties of new whey protein isolate/ polyvinyl alcohol blends for food flexible packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 19:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu W, Tian H, Xiang A (2012) Influence of polyol plasticizers on the properties of polyvinyl alcohol films fabricated by melt processing. J Polym Environ 20:63–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Iqbal DN, Tariq M, Khan SM et al (2020) Synthesis and characterization of chitosan and guar gum based ternary blends with polyvinyl alcohol. Int J Biol Macromol 143:546–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Monjazeb Marvdashti L, Koocheki A, Yavarmanesh M (2017) Alyssum homolocarpum seed gum-polyvinyl alcohol biodegradable composite film: Physicochemical, mechanical, thermal and barrier properties. Carbohydr Polym 155:280–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cazón P, Vázquez M, Velazquez G (2018) Cellulose-glycerol-polyvinyl alcohol composite films for food packaging: Evaluation of water adsorption, mechanical properties, light-barrier properties and transparency. Carbohydr Polym 195:432–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu H, Xiao D, Lu J et al (2020) Preparation and properties of biocomposite films based on poly(vinyl alcohol) incorporated with eggshell powder as a biological Filler. J Polym Environ 28:2020–2028

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Q, Du L, Yang Y, Wang L (2016) rheology of fi lm-forming solutions and physical properties of tara gum fi lm reinforced with polyvinyl alcohol ( PVA ). Food Hydrocoll 63:677–684

    Google Scholar 

  32. Talens P, Krochta JM (2006) Plasticizing effects of beeswax and carnauba wax on tensile and water vapor permeability properties of whey protein films. J Food Sci 70:E239–E243

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gurgel M, Vieira A, Altenhofen M et al (2011) Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films : a review. Eur Polym J 47:254–263

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cao L, Liu W, Wang L (2018) Developing a green and edible film from cassia gum: the effects of glycerol and sorbitol. J Clean Prod 175:276–282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Razavi SMA, Mohammad Amini A, Zahedi Y (2015) Characterisation of a new biodegradable edible film based on sage seed gum: influence of plasticiser type and concentration. Food Hydrocoll 43:290–298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian H, Liu D, Yao Y et al (2017) Effect of sorbitol plasticizer on the structure and properties of melt processed polyvinyl alcohol films. J Food Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Y, Liu Z, Zhang L et al (2020) Effects of plasticizer type and concentration on rheological, physico-mechanical and structural properties of chitosan/zein film. Int J Biol Macromol 143:334–340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huntrakul K, Harnkarnsujarit N (2020) Effects of plasticizers on water sorption and aging stability of whey protein/carboxy methyl cellulose films. J Food Eng 272:109809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. TeckKim Y, Min B, WonKim K (2013) General characteristics of packaging materials for food system. In: Han JH (ed) Innovations in food packaging, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2001) Plasticizer effect on mechanical properties of β-lactoglobulin films. J Food Eng 50:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cao N, Yang X, Fu Y (2009) Effects of various plasticizers on mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of gelatin films. Food Hydrocoll 23:729–735

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tapia-Blácido DR, do Amaral Sobral PJ, Menegalli FC, (2011) Optimization of amaranth flour films plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol by multi-response analysis. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44:1731–1738

    Google Scholar 

  43. Barreto PLM, Pires ATN, Soldi V (2003) Thermal degradation of edible films based on milk proteins and gelatin in inert atmosphere. Polym Degrad Stab 79:147–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Aydin AA, Ilberg V (2016) Effect of different polyol-based plasticizers on thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol: starch blends. Carbohydr Polym 136:441–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Aytac.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ucpinar Durmaz, B., Aytac, A. Effects of Polyol-Based Plasticizer Types and Concentration on the Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Casein Blend Films. J Polym Environ 29, 313–322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01881-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01881-x

Keywords

Navigation