Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpersonal Distances in Group Walking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial organization of 1,020 groups comprised of adolescents and young adults, observed in an ecological setting while walking, was analyzed. Observations were made in an urban environment where walking speed could be considered. The results showed that male dyads and triads tended to walk abreast less often than female dyads. Mixed dyads walked abreast more often than same-sex dyads; and the males preceded the females in two-thirds of the cases. The male groups walked at a higher rate of speed than the female groups. Walking speed was correlated to misalignment between group members when walking. The most frequent spatial arrangement in triads was a “<” formation (as seen from above, while the walking direction was from left to right), with the middle individual positioned slightly behind in comparison to the lateral individuals. Groups comprised of more than three individuals tended to split themselves into single individuals, dyads, and triads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J. R. (1987). Human spatial behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 505–531). New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, S. K. (1991). Personal space as affected by religions of the approaching and the approached people. Indian Journal of Behavior, 15, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, W. A., & Bell, P. A. (1997). An unobtrusive apparatus for measuring interpersonal distance. Journal of General Psychology, 107, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, B. A., Corbitt, L. C., Estes, J. P., & Topping, J. S. (1976). Effect of social stigma on interpersonal distance. The Psychological Record, 26, 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. C. (1970). Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. Sociometry, 4, 444–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th ed.). Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed., pp. 193–281). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, W. (1981). The effect of density, sex, and group size upon pedestrian walking velocity. Man Environment System, 11, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H. (1976). The pace of life: Revisited. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Bornstein, H. G. (1976). The pace of life. Nature, 259, 557–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1979). Measurement of spatial behavior: Methodology applied to rhesus monkeys, neon tetras, communal and solitary spiders, cockroaches, and gnat in open fields. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 26, 132–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1980). Social group spacing of rhesus macaque troops in outdoor enclosures: Environmental effects. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 30, 49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1983a). Developmental trends in proxemic spacing behavior between surrounding companions and strangers in casual groups. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1983b). Interpersonal spacing behavior between surround nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1984). Do humans show a “species-typical group size”? Age, sex, and environmental differences in the size and composition of naturally-occurring casual groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. W. (1989). The social biology of human populations: Spontaneous group formation conforms to evolutionary predictions of adaptive aggregation patterns. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, M. E., & Goldman, M. (1981). Personal space violation as a function of height. Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciolek, T. M. (1983). The proxemics lexicon: A first approximation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. (1970). Experiments on orientation and proxemics. Human Relations, 23, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Unger, R. (2000). Women and gender: A feminist psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B., & Friedman, H. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed., pp. 3–39). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A. S., & Barrett, J. (1971). Variations in personal space as a function of authoritarianism, self-esteem, and racial characteristics of a stimulus situations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, L. R. (1976). Effects of field dependence on affective reactions and compliance in dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, J. J., Bailey, K. G., & Hartley, H. S. (1974). Body height, position, and sex as determinants of personal space. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 87, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 293–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heshka, S., & Nelson, Y. (1972). Interpersonal speaking distance as a function of age, sex, and relationship. Sociometry, 35, 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, L. A. (1968). Pedestrian travel rates in central business districts. Traffic Engineering, 38, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. M. (1992). Children’s artwork and nonverbal communication. Child Study Journal, 22, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., & Meisels, M. (1972). Effects of performance evaluation on interpersonal distance. Journal of Personality, 40, 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, N., & Erkip, F. E. (1999). Invasion of personal space under the condition of short-term crowding: A case study on an automatic teller machine. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, L. M., & Bell, P. A. (1984). Field dependence and interpersonal distance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 421–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S. (1972). Boundaries around social space: Dyadic responses to an invader. Environment and Behavior, 4, 437–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S. (1976). Group size and the extension of social space boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 647–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S., & Brickner, M. A. (1981). Social cohesion effects on spatial cohesion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. S., & Sommer, R. (1967). Seating arrangements and status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 90–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Diamond, S. G. (1971). Effects of furniture arrangement, props, and personality on social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive: Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy, and sociodrama. New York: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1977). Interpersonal distance, affect, and equilibrium theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S., & Brinkman, H. (1995). Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: Effects of culture, gender, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 281–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid Mast, M. (2002). Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males’? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (1997). Children’s personal distance and their empathy: Indices of interpersonal closeness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, D. J., & Lewis, G. J. (1989). The pace of pedestrian flows in cities. Environment and Behavior, 21, 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellens, A. R., & Goldberg, M. L. (1978). The effects of interpersonal distance and orientation upon the perception of social relationships. Journal of Psychology, 99, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, F. N. (1966). Initial speaking distance as the function of the speakers’ relationship. Psychonomic Science, 5, 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, P., & Ries, G. (1992). The pace of life-reanalysed: Why does walking speed of pedestrians correlate with city size? Behaviour, 123, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy

    Marco Costa

Authors
  1. Marco Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Costa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, M. Interpersonal Distances in Group Walking. J Nonverbal Behav 34, 15–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0077-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0077-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation