Abstract
This study examined age differences in the pattern of proxemic behavior observed in casual groups frequenting public environments. Observations were made in the corridors of large shopping malls and along sidewalks of small towns. The relative positions of all walking subjects were inconspicuously recorded in photographs, and interpersonal distances were measured by projecting slides on a calibrated grid. Distances to first, second, and third nearest companions and first, second, and third nearest strangers were computed for subjects in six age classes: preschool children, grade school children, teenagers, young adults, middle adults, and senior adults. All classes showed significant age differences in the distances maintained to companions (p = .00001), but only senior adults differed in their spacing toward strangers, by maintaining significantly closer distances than the other age groups (p < .01). Tests of spatial patterns showed significant aggregations between first, second, and third nearest companions, and essentially random spacing toward first nearest strangers in all age groups. Senior adults showed a significant tendency to aggregate with their second and third nearest surrounding strangers. These results are discussed in the light of oer research and in the context of the ecology and development of proxemic behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiello, M.R., & Aiello, T.D.C. The development of personal space: Proxemic behavior in children 6 through 16.Human Ecology 1974,2 177–189.
Baxter, J.C. Interpersonal spacing in natural settings.Sociometry 1970,33 444–456.
Burgess, J.W. Measurement of spatial behavior.Behavioral and Neural Biology 1979,26 132–160.
Burgess, J.W. Social group spacing of rhesus macaque troops in outdoor enclosures: Environmental effects.Behavioral and Neural Biology 1980,30 49–55.
Burgess, J.W. Development of social spacing in normal and mentally retarded children.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1981,6 89–95.
Burgess, J.W. Interpersonal spacing behavior between surrounding nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density.Ethology and Sociobiology, 1982.
Burgess, J.W., & McMurphy, D. The development of proxemic spacing behavior: Children's distances to surrounding playmates and adults change between 6 months and 5 years of age.Developmental Psychobiology, 1982.
Burgess, J.W., & Shaw, E. Development and ecology of fish schooling.Oceanus 1979,22 2, 111–17.
Burgess, J.W., & Shaw, E. Effects of acousticolateralis denervation in a facultative schooling fish: A nearest-neighbor matrix analysis.Behavioral and Neural Biology 1981,33 488–497.
Burgess, J.W., Witt, P.N., Phoebus, E., & Weisbard, C. The spacing of rhesus monkey troops changes when a few members receive 9THC or d-amphetamine.Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 1980,13 121–124.
Ciolek, M.T. Spatial arrangements in social encounters: An attempt at a taxonomy.Man-Environment Systems 1978,8 52–59.
Coss, R.G., & Burgess, J.W. Jewel fish retain juvenile spacing after crowded development.Developmental Psychobiology 1981,14 451–457.
Dennis, V.C., & Powell, E.R. Nonverbal communication in across-race dyads.Proceedings of the 80th Convention of the American Psychological Association 1972,7 557–558. (Summary).
Esser, A.H. (Ed.).Behavior and environment. New York, Plenum Press, 1971.
Evans, G.W. Personal space: Research review and bibliography.Man-Environment Systems 1973,3 203–215.
Games, P.A. A three-factor model encompassing many possible statistical tests on independent groups.Psychological Bulletin 1978,85 168–182.
Haduk, L.A. Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview.Psychological Bulletin 1978,85 117–134.
Hall, E.T.The hidden dimension New York, Doubleday, 1966.
Horowitz, M.J. Spatial behavior and psychopathology.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1968,146 24–35.
Hutt, C., & Vaizey, M.J. Differential effects of group density on social behavior.Nature 1966,209 1371–1372.
Markey, J.J. The ontogenesis of proxemic behavior among school-aged children,Dissertation Abstracts 1971,32 (3B), 1851.
Meisels, M., & Guardo, C.J. Development of personal space schemata.Child Development 1969,40 1167–1178.
Pederson, D.H. Developmental trends in personal space.Journal of Psychology 1973,83 3–9.
Price, G.H., & Dabbs, J.M., Sex, setting and personal space: Changes as children grow older. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 1974,1 362–363.
Rheingold, L.A., & Eckerman, C.O. The infant separates himself from his mother.Science 1970,168 78–90.
Richer, J.M. The social avoidance behavior of autistic children.Animal Behaviour 1976,24 898–906.
Severy, L.J., Forsyth, D.R., & Wagner, P.J. A multimethod assessment of personal space development in female and male, black and white children.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1979,4 68–86.
Sommer, R. Studies in personal space.Sociometry 1959,22 247–260.
Sommer, R.Personal space. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1969.
Tennis, G.H., & Dabbs, J.M. Sex, setting and personal space: First grade through college.Sociometry 1975,38 385–394.
Thompson, H.E. Distribution of distance to Nth neighbor in a population of randomly distributed individuals.Ecology 1956,37 391–394.
Wekowitz, T.E., & Sommer, R. Body image and self-concept in schizophrenia.Journal of Mental Science 1960,106 17–39.
Willis, F.N., Carlson, R., & Reeves, D. The development of personal space in primary school children.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 1979,3 195–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Funding was provided by a National Science Foundation grant, BNS 79-06843, to J.W. Burgess. Additional fundint was provided by a grant from the Consumer Research Center, University of California (Robert Sommer, Director), and by Sigma Xi grants to J.W. Burgess. The author thanks Ms. Deanna Johnson for expert help in behavioral observation and decoding.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, J.W. Developmental trends in proxemic spacing behavior between surrounding companions and strangers in casual groups. J Nonverbal Behav 7, 158–169 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986946
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986946