Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blinking During and After Lying

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis derived from eye blink literature that when liars experience cognitive demand, their lies would be associated with a decrease in eye blinks, directly followed by an increase in eye blinks when the demand has ceased after the lie is told. A total of 13 liars and 13 truth tellers lied or told the truth in a target period; liars and truth tellers both told the truth in two baseline periods. Their eye blinks during the target and baseline periods and directly after the target period (target offset period) were recorded. The predicted pattern (compared to the baseline periods, a decrease in eye blinks during the target period and an increase in eye blinks during the target offset period) was found in liars and was strikingly different from the pattern obtained in truth tellers. They showed an increase in eye blinks during the target period compared to the baseline periods, whereas their pattern of eye blinks in the target offset period did not differ from baseline periods. The implications for lie detection are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bageley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. O., Goldstein, R., & Stern, J. A. (1987). Effects of information processing demands on physiological response patterns. Human Factors, 29, 213–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caso, L., Gnisci, A., Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2005). Processes underlying deception: An empirical analysis of truths and lies when manipulating the stakes. Journal of Interviewing and Offender Profiling, 2, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiba, H. (1985). Analysis of controlling facial expression when experiencing negative effect on an anatomical basis. Journal of Human Development, 21, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, G. C. (1951). Variations in reflex blink-rate during visual motor tasks. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R., Bauer, L. O., & Stern, J. A. (1992). Effect of task difficulty and interstimulus interval on blink parameters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). Facial Movements during anxiety states. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. K., & Tarlow, G. (1972). Blinking and mental load. Psychological Reports, 31, 119–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. K., & Tarlow, G. (1975). Blinking and thinking. Psychological Reports, 41, 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leal, S. (2005). Central and peripheral physiology of attention and cognitive demand: Understanding how brain and body work together. Ph.D. thesis, University of Portsmouth, Department of Psychology.

  • Malmstrom, F. V., Rachofsky, S. E., & Weber, R. J. (1977). Effects of illumination and meter on spontaneous blinking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., & Vrij, A. (2006). Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real life police interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCornack, S. A. (1997). The generation of deceptive messages: Laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 91–126). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M. E., Brodt, S. E., & Croson, R. T. A. (2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. A., Farrow, T. F. D., Herford, A. E., Wilkinson, I. D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849–2853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., et al. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1755–1762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. A., Walrath, L. C., & Goldstein, R. (1984). The endogenous eye blink. Psychophysiology, 21, 22–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., & Hick, R. F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgements in self-generated trivial and serious situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecce, J. J. (1992). Psychology: Physiology and experimental. In McGraw-Hill yearbook of science and technology (pp. 375–377). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Vrij, A. (2002). Telling and detecting lies. In N. Brace & H. L. Westcott (Eds.), Applying psychology (pp. 179–241). Milton Keynes, Open University.

  • Vrij, A. (2004). Invited article: Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Knight, S. (2006a). Police officers’, social workers’, teachers’ and the general public’s beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Morris, P. M. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006b). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (in press). Increasing cognitive load in interviews to detect deceit. In B. Milne, S. Savage, & T. Williamson (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing. Uffculme: Willan Publishing.

  • Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2003). Deception detection. In P. W. Halligan, C. Bass, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), Malingering and illness deception (pp. 348–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2006). Criteria-based content analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006c). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 589–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behaviour during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about live events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H. G., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Stress specifics: Differential effects of coping style, gender, and type of stressor on automatic arousal, facial expression, and subjective feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 147–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. H., & Burgoon, J. K. (2001). Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations. Human Communication Research, 27, 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–57). New York: Academic Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth (UK), King Henry I St., Portsmouth, England, PO1 2DY

    Sharon Leal & Aldert Vrij

Authors
  1. Sharon Leal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aldert Vrij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Leal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leal, S., Vrij, A. Blinking During and After Lying. J Nonverbal Behav 32, 187–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-008-0051-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-008-0051-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation