Skip to main content
Log in

User Centered Design to Improve Information Exchange in Diabetes Care Through eHealth

Results from a Small Scale Exploratory Study

  • Patient Facing Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneity of people with diabetes makes maintaining blood glucose control and achieving therapy adherence a challenge. It is fundamental that patients get actively involved in the management of the disease in their living environments. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the use and acceptance of a self-management system for diabetes developed with User Centered Design Principles in community settings. Persons with diabetes and health professionals were involved the design, development and evaluation of the self-management system; which comprised three iterative cycles: scenario definition, user archetype definition and system development. A comprehensive system was developed integrating modules for the management of blood glucose levels, medication, food intake habits, physical activity, diabetes education and messaging. The system was adapted for two types of principal users (personas): Type 1 Diabetes user and Type 2 Diabetes user. The system was evaluated by assessing the use, the compliance, the attractiveness and perceived usefulness in a multicenter randomized pilot study involving 20 patients and 24 treating professionals for a period of four weeks. Usage and compliance of the co-designed system was compared during the first and the last two weeks of the study, showing a significantly improved behaviour of patients towards the system for each of the modules. This resulted in a successful adoption by both type of personas. Only the medication module showed a significantly different use and compliance (p= 0.01) which can be explained by the different therapeutic course of the two types of diabetes. The involvement of patients to make their own decisions and choices form design stages was key for the adoption of a self-management system for diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nolte, E, and McKee, M, Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. UK: McGraw-Hill Education, 2008. ISBN 9780335236909.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenheimer, T, Lorig, K, Holman, H, and Grumbach K, PAtient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 288(19):2469–2475, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.19.2469. ISSN 0098-7484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Diabetes Association, Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 31(Supplement 1): S12–S54, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-S012, http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/31/Supplement_1/S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Inzucchi, S E, Bergenstal, R M, Buse, J B, Diamant, M, Ferrannini, E, Nauck, M, Peters, A L, Tsapas, A, Wender, R, and Matthews, D R, Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 Diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American diabetes association and the European association for the study of diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(1):140–149, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2441. ISSN 19355548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zarkogianni, K, Litsa, E, Mitsis, K, Wu, P, Kaddi, C, Cheng, C, Wang, M, and Nikita, K, A review of emerging technologies for the management of diabetes mellitus. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. PP(99):1, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2470521. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26292334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reutens, A T, Hutchinson, R, Binh, T V, Cockram, C, Deerochanawong, C, Ho, L T, Ji, L, Khalid, B A K, Kong, A P S, Lim-Abrahan, M A, Tan, C E, Tjokroprawiro, A, Yoon, K H, Zmmet, P Z, and Shaw, J E, The GIANT study, a cluster-randomised controlled trial of efficacy of education of doctors about type 2 diabetes mellitus management guidelines in primary care practice. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 98(1): 38–45, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.06.002. ISSN 01688227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aslan, S., Ciocca, G., and Schettini, R.: Semantic segmentation of food images for automatic dietary monitoring. In: 2018 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), pp. 1–4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2018.8404824.

  8. Gómez, E J, Hernando Pérez, M E, Vering, T, Cros, M R, Bott, O, García-Sáez, G, Pretschner, P, Bruguéz, E, Schnell, O, Patte, C, Bergmann, J, Dudde, R, and de Leiva, A, The INCA system: A further step towards a telemedical artificial pancreas. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12(4): 470–479, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2007.902162. ISSN 10897771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez-Millana, A, Fico, G, Fernández-Llatas, C, and Traver, V, Performance assessment of a closed-loop system for diabetes management. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 53(12):1295–1303, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1245-3. ISSN 1741-0444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oreskovic, N M, Maniates, J, Weilburg, J, and Choy, G, Optimizing the use of electronic health records to identify high-risk psychosocial determinants of Health. JMIR Med. Inf. 5 (3): e25, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8240. http://medinform.jmir.org/2017/3/e25/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Conte, R., Sansone, F., Grande, A., Tonacci, A., Napoli, F., Pala, A. P., Raciti, M., and Landi, P.: Development of an integrated ict system for data production, standardization and elaboration in health care. In: 2017 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB). https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB.2017.7995426, pp. 321–324, 2017.

  12. Ryu, B, Kim, N, Heo, E, Yoo, S, Lee, K, Hwang, H, Kim, J.-W., Kim, Y, Lee, J, and Jung, S Y, Impact of an electronic health record-integrated personal health record on patient participation in health care: development and randomized controlled trial of MyHealthKeeper. J. Med. Int. Res. 19(12):e401, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8867. http://www.jmir.org/2017/12/e401/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chavez, S, Fedele, D, Guo, Y, Bernier, A, Smith, M, Warnick, J, and Modave, F, Mobile Apps for the management of diabetes. Diabetes Care 40(10):e145–e146, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0853. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.2337/dc17-0853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Irace, C, Schweitzer, M A, Tripolino, C, Scavelli, F B, and Gnasso, A, Diabetes data management system to improve glycemic control in people with type 1 Diabetes: Prospective cohort study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 5(11):e170, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8532. http://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/11/e170/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Helal, A, Cook, D J, and Schmalz, M, Smart home-based health platform for behavioral monitoring and alteration of diabetes patients. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 3(1):141–148, 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769843/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Synnott, J, Chen, L, Nugent, C D, and Moore, G: Flexible and customizable visualization of data generated within intelligent environments. In: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347317, pp. 5819–5822, 2012.

  17. Shahar, Y, Goren-Bar, D, Boaz, D, and Tahan, G, Distributed, intelligent, interactive visualization and exploration of time-oriented clinical data and their abstractions. Artif. Intell. Med. 38(2):115–135, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2005.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fico, G., Fioravanti, A., Teresa Arredondo, M., Gorman, J., Diazzi, C., Arcuri, G., Conti, C., and Pirini, G., Integration of personalized healthcare pathways in an ict platform for diabetes managements: a small-scale exploratory study. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 20(1):29–38, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2367863. ISSN 2168-2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salzburg Global Seminar, Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 342:d1745, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1745, http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stacey, D, Bennett, C L, Barry, M J, Col, N F, Eden, K B, Holmes-Rovner, M, Llewellyn-Thomas, H, Lyddiatt, A, Légaré, F, and Thomson, R, Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10:CD001431, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gabert, R, Thomson, B, Gakidou, E, and Roth, G, Identifying high-risk neighborhoods using electronic medical records: a population-based approach for targeting diabetes prevention and treatment interventions. PloS one 11(7):e0159227, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159227. ISSN 19326203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Barry, M J, and Edgman-Levitan S, Shared decision making — the pinnacle of patient-centered care. England J. Med. 366(9):780–781, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283. ISSN 0028-4793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fico, G, Cancela, J, Arredondo, M T, Dagliati, A, Sacchi, L, Segagni, D, Millana, A M, Fernandez-Llatas, C, Traver, V, Sambo, F, et al: User requirements for incorporating diabetes modeling techniques in disease management tools. In: 6th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, pp. 992–995. Springer, 2015.

  24. Draznin, B, Gilden, J, Golden, S H, and Inzucchi, S E, Pathways to quality inpatient management of hyperglycemia and diabetes: A call to action. Diabetes Care 36(7):1807–1814, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2508. ISSN 01495992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nielsen, J, and Molich, R: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’90, pp. 249–256. ACM, New York, 1990.. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/97243.97281

  26. Flores, A E, Ph, D, and Vergara, V M: Functionalities of open electronic health records system. Biomed. Eng. (Bmei), 602–607. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6747011, 2013

  27. Guillén, A, Colás, J, Fico, G, and Guillén, S: Metabo: a new paradigm towards diabetes disease management. An innovative business model. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, pp. 3554–3557. IEEE, 2011.

  28. Hassenzahl, M, Burmester, M, and Koller, F: Attrakdiff: Ein fragebogen zur messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer qualität. In: Mensch & Computer 2003, pp. 187–196. Springer, 2003.

  29. Davis, F D: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart., 319–340, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fioravanti, A, Fico, G, Salvi, D, García-Betances, R I, and Arredondo, M T, Automatic messaging for improving patient’s engagement in diabetes management: an exploratory study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 53(12): 1285–1294, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1237-8. ISSN 0140-0118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haas, L, Maryniuk, M, Beck, J, Cox, C E, Duker, P, Edwards, L, Fisher, E B, Hanson, L, Kent, D, Kolb, L, McLaughlin, S, Orzeck, E, Piette, J D, Rhinehart, A S, Rothman, R, Sklaroff, S, Tomky, D, and Youssef, G., National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care 35(11):2393–2401, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1707. ISSN 01495992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinn, C C, Sareh, P L, Shardell, M L, Terrin, M L, Barr, E A, and Gruber-Baldini, A L, Mobile diabetes intervention for glycemic control. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 8(2):362–370, 2014. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1932296813514503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by European Commission under the 7th Framework Program grant agreement number 216270.3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Fico.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Patient Facing Systems

European Commission under the 7th Framework Program grant agreement number 216270.3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fico, G., Martinez-Millana, A., Leuteritz, JP. et al. User Centered Design to Improve Information Exchange in Diabetes Care Through eHealth. J Med Syst 44, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1472-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1472-5

Keywords

Navigation