Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Hospital Choice of Rural Hospital Patients: The Impact of Networks, Service Scopes, and Market Competition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among 10,384 rural Colorado female patients who received MDC 14 (obstetric services) from 2000 to 2003, 6,615 (63.7%) were admitted to their local rural hospitals; 1,654 (15.9%) were admitted to other rural hospitals; and 2,115 (20.4%) traveled to urban hospitals for inpatient services. This study is to examine how network participation, service scopes, and market competition influences rural women’s choice of hospital for their obstetric care. A conditional logistic regression analysis was used. The network participation (p < 0.01), the number of services offered (p < 0.05), and the hospital market competition had a positive and significant relationship with patients’ choice to receive obstetric care. That is, rural patients prefer to receive care from a hospital that participates in a network, that provides more number of services, and that has a greater market share (i.e., a lower level of market competition) in their locality. Rural hospitals could actively increase their competitiveness and market share by increasing the number of health care services provided and seeking to network with other hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaron, H., Serious and unstable condition: financing America’s health care. Washing DC, USA: Brookings Institution, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, K., and Wright, G., Hospital choice of Medicare beneficiaries in a rural markets: why not the closest? J. Rural Health. 7:143–152, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, K., Houchens, R., Wright, G., and Robbins, J., Predicting hospital choice for rural Medicare beneficiaries: the role of severity of illness. Health Serv. Res. 26:583–612, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allison, P., Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. Gary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Hospital Association, Hospital statistics 2003 edition. Chicago, Illinois: American Hospital Association, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, L. C., and Phibbs, C. S., Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care. RAND J. Econ. 33:524–548, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bamezai, A., Zwanziger, J., Melnick, G. A., and Mann, J., Price competition and hospital cost growth in the United States (1989–1994). Health Econ. 8:233–243, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronstein, J. M., and Morrisey, M., Determinants of rural travel distance for obstetrics care. Med. Care. 28:853–865, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronstein, J. M., and Morrisey, M., Bypassing rural hospitals for obstetric care. J. Health Polit. Policy Law. 16:87–118, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buczko, W., What affects rural beneficiaries use of urban and rural hospitals? Health Care Financ. Rev. 14:107–115, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buczko, W., Bypassing of local hospitals by rural Medicare beneficiaries. J. Rural Health. 10:237–246, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bundorf, M. K., Schulman, K. A., Stafford, J. A., Gaskin, D., Jollis, J. G., and Escarce, J. J., Impact of managed care on the treatment, costs, and outcomes of fee-for-service Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. Health Serv. Res. 39:7–12, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chernew, M., Scanlon, D., and Hayward, R., Insurance types and choice of hospital for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Health Serv. Res. 11:43–62, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choi, T. C., Allison, R. F., and Munson, K., Impact of environment on state university hospital performance. An explanatory model. Med. Care. 44:855–871, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colorado Health & Hospital Association, Inpatient discharge data, 2000–2003. Denver, CO, 2000–2003.

  16. Connor, R. A., Feldman, R. D., and Dowd, B. E., The effects of market concentration and horizontal mergers on hospital costs and prices. Int. J. Econ. Bus. 5:2159–180, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Arc view. Redlands, CA, 2000.

  18. Forti, E. M., and Silva, E., Rural health care. In: Kilpatrick, and Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of Health Administration and PolicyMarcel Dekker, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garnick, D., Lichtenberg, E., Phibbs, C., Luft, H., Peltzman, D., and McPhee, S., The sensitivity of conditional choice model for hospital care to estimation techniques. J. Health Econ. 8:377–397, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaskin, D. J., and Hadley, J., The impact of HMO penetration on the rate of hospital cost inflation, 1985–1993. Inquiry. 34:205–216, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goldsteen, R., Falcone, D., Broyles, R., Goldsteen, K., and Reily, B., Local factors affecting the tendency to bypass local hospitals for inpatient mental health care: An exploratory analysis. J. Rural Health. 10:89–97, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keeler, E., Melnick, G. A., and Zwanziger, J., The changing effects of competition on non-profit and for-profit hospital pricing behavior. J. Health Econ. 18:69–86, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kessler, D., and McClellan, M., The effects of hospital ownership on medical productivity. RAND J. Econ. 33:488–506, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler, D., and Geppert, J., The effects of competition on variation in the quality and cost of medical care. NBER Working Paper No. W11226, 2005.

  25. Lillie-Blanton, M., Felt, S., Redmon, P., Renn, S., Machlin, S., and Wennar, E., Rural and urban hospital closures, 1985–1988: operating and environmental characteristics that affect risk. Inquiry. 29:332–344, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luft, H. S., Robinson, J. C., Garnick, D. W., Maerki, S. C., and McPhee, S. J., The role of specialized clinical services in competition among hospitals. Inquiry. 23:83–94, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luft, H., Garnick, D., Mark, D., Peltzman, D., Phibbs, C., Lichtenberg, E., and McPhee, S., Does quality influence choice of hospital? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263:2899–2906, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morrisey, M. A., Competition in hospital and insurance markets: review and research agenda. Health Serv. Res. 36:1191–221, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mullner, R. M., and Whiteis, D., Rural community hospital closure and health policy. Health Policy. 10:123–135, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mullner, R. M., Rydman, R., and Whiteis, D., Rural hospital survival: an analysis of facilities and services correlated with risk of closure. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 35:121–137, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Phibbs, C., Mark, D., Luft, H., Peltzman-Rennie, D., Garnick, D., Lichtenberg, E., and McPhee, S., Choice of hospital for delivery: A comparison of high-risk and low-risk women. Health Serv. Res. 28:201–222, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson, J. C., HMO market penetration and hospital cost inflation in California. JAMA. 266:2719–2723, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson, J. C., and Casalino, L. P., Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. Health Aff. 15:7–22, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rogowski, J., Jain, A. K., and Escarce, J. J., Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions in California. Health Serv. Res. 42:682–705, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roh, C. Y., and Moon, M., Nearby, but not wanted? the bypassing of rural hospitals and policy implications for rural health care systems. Policy Stud. J. 33:477–494, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rohrer, J. E., Closing rural hospitals: reducing ‘institutional bias’ or denial of access? J. Pub. Health Policy. 10:353–358, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shukla, R. K., Pestian, J., and Clement, J., A comparative analysis of revenue and cost-management strategies of not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals. Hosp. Health Serv. Adm. 42:117–134, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sisk, J. E., Increased competition and the quality in health care. Milbank Q. 76:687–707, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tai, W. T., Porell, F. W., and Adams, E. K., Hospital choice of rural Medicare beneficiaries: patient, hospital attributes, and the patient–physician relationship. Health Serv. Res. 39:1903–1922, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tennyson, D. H., and Fottler, M. D., Does system membership enhance financial performance in hospitals? Med. Care Res. Rev. 57:29–50, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zwanziger, J., and Melnick, G. A., The effects of hospital competition and the Medicare PPS program on hospital cost behavior in California. J. Health Econ. 7:301–320, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zwanziger, J., Melnick, G. A., and Bamezai, A., Cost and price competition in California hospitals, 1980–1990. Health Aff. 13:4118–126, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zwanziger, J., and Melnick, G. A., Can managed care plans control health care costs? Health Aff. 15:2185–199, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zwanziger, J., Melnick, G. A., and Bamezai, A., The effect of selective contracting on hospital costs and revenues. Health Serv. Res. 35:849–867, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keon-Hyung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roh, CY., Lee, KH. & Fottler, M.D. Determinants of Hospital Choice of Rural Hospital Patients: The Impact of Networks, Service Scopes, and Market Competition. J Med Syst 32, 343–353 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9139-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9139-7

Keywords

Navigation