Both male and female solitary bees visit flowers for rewards. Sex related differences in foraging efficiency may also affect their probability to act as pollinators. In some major genera of solitary bees, males can be identified from a distance enabling a comparative foraging-behavior study. We have simultaneously examined nectar foraging of males and females of three bee species on five plant species in northern Israel. Males and females harvested equal nectar amounts but males spent less time in each flower increasing their foraging efficiency at this scale. The overall average visit frequencies of females and males was 27.2 and 21.6 visits per flower per minute respectively. Females flew shorter distances increasing their visit frequency, relative foraging efficiency and their probability to pollinate. The proportion of conspecific pollen was higher on females, indicating higher floral constancy and pollination probability. The longer flights of males increase their probability to cross-pollinate. Our results indicate that female solitary bees are more efficient foragers; females seem also to be more efficient pollinators but males contribute more to long-distance pollen flow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bertsch, A. (1987). Flowers as food sources and the cost of outcrossing. In Schulze, E. D. and Zwolfer, H. (eds.), Ecological studies, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 277–293.
Bonduriansky, R. (2001). The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76: 305–339.
Chittka, L., Gumbert, A., and Kunze, J. (1997). Foraging dynamics of bumblebees: correlates of movements between plant species. Behav. Ecol. 8: 239–249.
Chittka, L., Thomson, J. D., and Waser, N. M. (1999). Flower constancy, insect psychology and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86: 361–377.
Cibula, D. A., and Zimmerman, M. (1986). Bumblebee foraging behavior: changes in departure decision as function of experimental nectar manipulations. Amer. Mid. Natur. 117: 386–394.
Dafni, A. (1992). Pollination ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Darwin, C. (1876). The Effect of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom, Murry, London.
DeJong, T. J., Waser, N. M., and Klinkhamer, P. G. L. (1993). Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 321–325.
Dukas, R., and Real, L. A. (1993a). Effects of recent experience on foraging decisions by bumblebees. Oecologia 94: 244–246.
Dukas, R., and Real, L. A. (1993b). Effects of nectar variance on learning by bumblebees. Animal Behav. 45: 37–41.
Eickwort, G. C., and Ginsberg, H. S. (1980). Foraging and mating behavior in Apoidea. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 25: 421–426.
Free, J. B. (1963). The flower constancy of honeybees. J. Animal Ecol. 32: 119–131.
Free, J. B. (1970). The flower constancy of bumble bees. J. Animal Ecol. 39: 395–402.
Fragman, O., Plitmann, U., Heller, D., and Shmida, A. (1999). Checklist and ecological data-base of the flora of Israel and its surroundings, Mifalot Yeffe Nof Publications, the Middle East Nature Conservation Promotion Association, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
Friedman, J. W., and Shmida, A. (1995). Pollination, gathering nectar, and the distribution of flower species. J. Theor. Biol. 175: 127–138.
Galen, C., and Plowright, R. (1985). The effects of nectar level on pollen carry-over in inflorescences of fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium, Onagraceae). Can. J. Bot. 63: 488–491.
Gegear, R. J., and Laverty, T. M. (2001). Floral constancy and variation among floral traits. In Chittka, L., and Thomson, J. D. (eds.), Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–20.
Handel, S. N. (1983). Pollination ecology, plant population structure and gene flow. In Real, L. (ed.), Pollination Biology, Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 163–211.
Harder, L. D. (1990). Pollen removal by bumble bees and its implications for pollen dispersal. Ecology 71: 1110–1125.
Harder, L. D., Williams, N. M., Jordan, C. Y., and Nelson, W. A. (2001). The effect of floral design on pollinator economics and pollen dispersal. In Chittka, L., and Thomson, J. D. (eds.), Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 297–319.
Heinrich, B. (1979). “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental hypothesis. Ecology 60: 245–255.
Hodges, C. M., and Wolf, L. L. (1981). Optimal foraging in bumblebees: why is nectar left behind in flowers? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 41–44.
Kadmon, R., and Shmida, A. (1992). Departure rules used by bees foraging for nectar: a field test. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 142–151.
Keasar, T., Shmida, A., and Motro, U. (1996). Innate movement rules in foraging bees: flight distances are affected by recent rewards and are correlated with choice of flower type. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 381–388.
MacArthur, R. H., and Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. Amer. Natur. 100: 603–608.
Marden, H. J. (1984a). Interpopulation variation in nectar secretion in Ampatiens capensis. Oecologia 63: 418–422.
Marden, H. J. (1984b). Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees. Oecologia 64: 232–240.
Marden, J. H., and Waddington, K. D. (1981). Floral choice by honeybees in relation to relative distance to flowers. Physiol. Entomol. 6: 431–435.
Michener, C. D. (2000). The bees of the world, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Milinski, M., and Parker, G. A. (1991). Competition for resources. In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 137–168.
Mitchell, R. J., and Waser, N. M. (1992). Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production – pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 78: 2532–2541.
Motro, U., and Shmida, A. (1995). Near-far search: an evolutionarily stable foraging strategy. J. Theor. Biol. 173: 15–22.
Ne’eman, G., and Dafni, A. (1999). A new pollination probability (PPI) index for pollen load analysis as a measure for pollination effectiveness of bees. J. Apicultural Res. 38: 19–23.
O’Toole, C., and Raw, A. (1991). Bees of the world, Blandford Press, London.
Pleasants, J. M., and Zimmerman, M. (1979). Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: evidence for hot and cold spots. Oecologia 41: 283–288.
Pleasants, J. M., and Zimmerman, M. (1983). The distribution of standing crops of nectar: what does it really tell us? Oecologia 57: 412–414.
Proctor, M., and Yeo, O. (1973). The Pollination of Flowers, Collins, London.
Pyke, G. H. (1978). Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theor. Popul. Biol. 13: 72–98.
Pyke, G. H. (1979). Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Animal Behav. 27: 1167–1181.
Pyke, G. H. (1982). Foraging in bumblebees: rule of departure from an inflorescence. Can. J. Zool. 60: 417–428.
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52: 137–154.
Real, L. A., and Rathcke, B. (1988). Patterns of individual variability in floral resources. Ecology 69: 728–735.
Schmid-Hempel, P., and Schmid-Hempel, R. (1987). Efficient nectar collecting by honeybees II. Response to factors determining nectar availability. J. Animal Ecol. 56: 219–227.
Schulke, B., and Waser, N. M. (2001). Long distance pollinator flights and pollen dispersal between populations of Delphinium nuttalianum. Oecologia 127: 239–245.
Selten, R., and Shmida, A. (1991). Pollinator foraging and flower competition in a game equilibrium model. In Selten, R. (ed.), Game Equilibrium Model, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 195–256.
Shmida, A., and Kadmon, R. (1991). Within-plant patchiness in nectar standing crop in Anchusa strigosa. Vegetatio 94: 95–99.
Thomson, J. D. (1985). Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium: influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. J. Ecol. 74: 329–341.
Thomson, J. D., and Chittka, L. (2001). Pollinator individuality: when does it matter? In Chittka, L., and Thomson, J. D. (eds.), Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 191–214.
Thomson, J. D., and Plowright, R. C. (1980). Pollen carry-over, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46: 68–74.
Thomson, J. D., Maddison, W. P., and Plowright, R. C. (1982). Behavior of bumblebee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae). Oecologia 54: 326–336.
Tinbergen, N., Impelkoven, M., and Frank, D. (1967). An experiment on spacing-out as a defense against predation. Behavior 28: 307–320.
Waddington, K. D. (1981). Factors influencing pollen flow in bumblebee-pollinated Delphinium virescens. Oikos 37: 153–159.
Waddington, K. D. (1983). Foraging behavior of pollinators. In Real, L. (ed.), Pollination Biology, Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 213–239.
Waser, N. M. (1983). The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In Real L. (ed.), Pollination Biology, Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 260–270.
Waser, N. M. (1986). Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Amer. Natur. 127: 593–603.
Waser, N. M., and Piece, M. V. (1991). Outcrossing distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: pollen loads, pollen tubes, and seed set. Ecology 72: 171–179.
Wells, H., and Wells, P. H. (1986). Optimal diet, uncertainty and individual constancy in foraging of honey bees, Apis mellifera. J. Animal Ecol. 55: 881–891.
Zohary, M., and Feinbrun-Dotan, N. (1966–1986). Flora Plaestina, Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank C. O’Toole for identification of the bees and information about their distribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ne’eman, G., Shavit, O., Shaltiel, L. et al. Foraging by Male and Female Solitary Bees with Implications for Pollination. J Insect Behav 19, 383–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9030-7
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9030-7