Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complex Non-Aerial Contests in the Lekking Butterfly Charis cadytis (Riodinidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Lekking butterflies typically defend territories using acrobatic aerial pursuits. Focal-method observations on marked Charis cadytis in SE Brazil revealed an unusual lek organization in which contest males disputed small core areas, whereas non-combative satellite males perched just outside their borders. Territorial interactions commonly began with two adversaries facing one another in a slow, non-contact ascending flight seemingly related to assessment. In disputes that continued, rival males perched on leaves where they engaged in one or more pushing bouts separated by short pursuits. In these sumo-like contests, obliquely facing males pushed their partially opened wings against one another until one was tilted sideways and flew off. Contest structure may be controlled by intruders that, by perching, provoke low-intensity contests that help prolong their stay in high-quality mating areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alcock, J. (1994). Alternative mate-locating tactics in Chlosyne californica (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Ethology 97: 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J., and Houston, T. F. (1996). Mating systems and male size in Australian hylaeine bees (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). Ethology 102: 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J., and O'Neill, K. M. (1986). Density-dependent mating tactics in the Grey hairstreak, Strymon melinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Zool. 209: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. R. (1972). Territorial behaviour of the nymphalid butterflies, Aglais urticae (L.) and Inachis io (L.). J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, W. W., Haddad, C. B., and Zikan, M. (1989). Territorial behavior and dominance in some heliconiine butterflies (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 43: 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky, R., and Brooks, R. J. (1999). Why do male antler flies (Protopiophila litigata) fight? The role of male combat in the structure of mating aggregations on moose antlers. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 11: 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. S., Jr. (1972). Borboletas da Serra do Japí: Diversidade, hábitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. In Morellato, L. P. C. (ed.), História Natural da Serra do Japí, UNICAMP/FAPESP, Campinas, Brazil, pp. 142–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, W. (1979). The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. B. (eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, NY, pp. 343–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convey, P. (1989). Influences on the choice between territorial and satellite behaviour in male Libellula quadrimaculata Linn. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 109: 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. (1978). Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): The resident always wins. Anim. Behav. 26: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deinert, E. I., Longino, J. T., and Gilbert, L. E. (1994). Mate competition in butterflies. Nature 370: 23–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, P. J. (1997). The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History. Volume II: Riodinidae, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, G. N. (1997). Resource defense mating system in antlered flies, Phytalmia spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 90: 496–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eff, D. (1962). A little about the little-known Papilio indra minori. J. Lepid. Soc. 16: 137– 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K., and Fiedler, K. (2001). Resource-based territoriality in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe and environmentally induced behavioural shifts. Anim. Behav. 61: 723–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., and Montgomerie, R. D. (1987). Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx maculata: Sneaking by older males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, A. V. L., Benson, W. W., Marini-F°, O. J., and de Carvalho, R. M. (1997). Territoriality by the dawn's early light: The Neotropical owl butterfly Caligo idomenaeus (Nymphalidae: Brassolinae). J. Res. Lepid. 34: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, J., and Alatalo, R. V. (1995). Leks, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P. A. (1994). Arena Birds: Sexual Selection and Behavior, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. J. (2003). Twilight fighting in the evening brown butterfly, Melanitis leda (L.) (Nymphalidae): Age and residency effects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. J., and Wiklund, C. (2001). Fighting without weaponry: A review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapton, R. W. (1985). Lek structure and territoriality in the chryxus arctic butterfly, Oeneis chryxus (Satyridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse, R. C. (1982). Territorial defense and lek behavior of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10: 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse, R. C., Codella, S. G., Grossmueller, D. W., and Maccarone, A. D. (1992). Host plant-based territoriality in the white peacock butterfly, Anartia jatrophae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marden, J. H., and Waage, J. K. (1990). Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav. 39: 954–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, D. A., and Gilbert, L. E. (1986). Pollen flow in Psiguria warscewiczii: A comparison of Heliconius butterflies and hummingbirds. Oecologia 68: 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, J. L. (2002). Insect Physiology and Biochemistry, CRC Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. F. (1971). Tropical Butterflies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrill, S. A., Gerhardt, H. C., and Daniel, R. (1978). Sexual parasitism in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). Science 200: 1179–1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, C. E. G. (1991). Territorial hilltopping behavior of three swallowtail butterflies (Lepideoptera, Papilionidae) in western Brazil. J. Res. Lepid. 29: 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L. (1983). Courtship behavior of the dainty sulfur butterfly, Nathalis iole with a description of a new, facultative male display (Pieridae). J. Res. Lepid. 20: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L. (1992). Male mate-locating behavior in the common eggfly, Hypolimnas bolina (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 46: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski, R. L., and Gilchrist, G.W. (1988). Male mate-locating behavior in the desert hackberry butterfly, Asterocampa leilia (Nymphalidae). J. Res. Lepid. 26: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberglied, R. E. (1984). Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies. In Vane-Wright, R. I., and Ackery, P. R. (eds.), The Biology of Butterflies, Academic Press, London, pp. 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky, M. (1994). Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: Parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23: 1–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N., Meeuse, B. J. D., Boerema, L. K., and Vorossieau, W. W. (1942). Die Balz des Samtfalters, Eumenis (= Satyrus) semele. Z. Tierpsychol. 5: 182–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R. (1853). On the habits of the butterflies of the Amazon valley. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1854: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P., and Wiklund, C. (1983). Territorial defence and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Anim. Behav. 31: 1206–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (1990). SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, SYSTAT Corp., Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Philip DeVries and an anonymous referee for their encouragement and helpful comments on the manuscript. Keith S. Brown, André V. L. Freitas, Helena P. Romanowski, Ronaldo B. Francini and Marcio R. Pie provided useful discussions and suggestions during earlier phases of the work. GWC and CEGP were supported by graduate fellowships from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq). WWB was supported during early phases of the work by a CNPq Research Fellowship. Lodging at the study site and authorization to conduct studies in the Environmental Protection Zone of the Serra do Japí were provided by the Municipal Government of Jundiaí

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woodruff W. Benson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaves, G.W., Patto, C.E.G. & Benson, W.W. Complex Non-Aerial Contests in the Lekking Butterfly Charis cadytis (Riodinidae). J Insect Behav 19, 179–196 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9016-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9016-5

KEY WORDS:

Navigation