Classical optimal-foraging theory predicts that a parasitoid is less likely to leave a patch after a host encounter when the host distribution is aggregated, whereas a parasitoid is more likely to leave after a host encounter when the host distribution is regular. Field data on host distributions in the area of origin of the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa showed that whiteflies aggregate at several spatial scales. However, infested leaves most likely contained a single host. This suggests that a host encounter is not enough to decide when to leave. We therefore tested the effect of host distribution and parasitoid experience on patch-leaving behavior. Each parasitoid was observed for several consecutive days in a three-dimensional arena with leaflets containing on average one host per leaflet in an either regular or aggregated host distribution. A proportional hazards model showed that a host encounter decreased the leaving tendency on a leaflet with one host when the time since the latest host encounter was short, but increased the leaving tendency when the time since the latest host encounter was long, independent of host distribution. We conclude that a parasitoid can switch from decreasing to increasing its tendency to leave a patch after a host encounter. We propose two hypotheses that may explain the evolution of such a switching mechanism.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10905-006-9014-7/MediaObjects/10905_2006_9014_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10905-006-9014-7/MediaObjects/10905_2006_9014_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10905-006-9014-7/MediaObjects/10905_2006_9014_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bernstein, C., and Driessen, G. (1996). Patch-marking and optimal search patterns in the parasitoid Venturia canescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 211–219.
Birkett, M. A., Chamberlain, K., Guerrieri, E., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Yasuda, T. (2003). Volatiles from whitefly-infested plants elicit a host-locating response in the parasitoid, Encarsia formosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 1589–1600.
Burger, J. M. S., Gort, G., van Lenteren, J. C., and Vet, L. E. M. (2004). Natural history of whitefly in Costa Rica: An evolutionary starting point. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 150–163.
Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9: 129–136.
Clark, C. W., and Mangel, M. (2000). Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Corbet, S. A. (1971). Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of flour moth, Anagasta kuehniella, contains an epideictic pheromone and elicits oviposition movements in a hymenopteran parasite. Nature 232: 481–484.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 34: 187–220.
Driessen, G., and Bernstein, C. (1999). Patch departure mechanisms and optimal host exploitation in an insect parasitoid. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 445–459.
Driessen, G., Bernstein, C., van Alphen, J. J. M., and Kacelnik, A. (1995). A count-down mechanism for host search in the parasitoid Venturia canescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 117–125.
Eggenkamp-Rotteveel Mansveld, M. H., van Lenteren, J. C., Ellenbroek, J. M., and Woets, J. (1982). The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hym., Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hom., Aleyrodidae). XII. Population dynamics of parasite and host in a large, commercial glasshouse and test of the parasite-introduction method used in the Netherlands. Z. angew. Entomol. 93: 113–130 (first part); 258–279 (second part).
Godfray, H. C. J. (1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Haccou, P., and Hemerik, L. (1985). The influence of larval dispersal in the cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae) on predation by the red wood ant (Formica polyctena): An analysis based on the proportional hazards model. J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 755–770.
Hemerik, L., Driessen, G., and Haccou, P. (1993). Effects of intra-patch experiences on patch time, search time and searching efficiency of the parasitoid Leptopilina clavipes. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 33–44.
Houston, A. I., and McNamara, J. M. (1999). Models of Adaptive Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M., and Yamamura, N. (1981). Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am. Nat. 117: 710–723.
Jervis, M. A., Heimpel, G. E., Ferns, P. N., Harvey, J. A., and Kidd, N. A. C. (2001). Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: A comparative analysis of ‘ovigeny’. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 442–458.
Kaiser, L., Perez-Maluf, R., Sandoz, J. C., Pham-Delegue, M. H. (2003). Dynamics of odour learning in Leptopilina boulardi, a hymenopterous parasitoid. Anim. Behav. 66: 1077–1084.
Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Prentice, R. L. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, New York.
van Lenteren, J. C. (2000). A greenhouse without pesticides: Fact or fantasy? Crop Protection 19: 375–384.
van Lenteren, J. C., Nell, H. W., Sevenster-van der Lelie, L. A., and Woets, J. (1976). The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). I. Host finding by the parasite. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 20: 123–130.
van Lenteren, J. C., van Roermund, H. J. W., and Sütterlin, S. (1996). Biological control of greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) with the parasitoid Encarsia formosa: How does it work? Biol. Control 6: 1–10.
Menzel, R., and Muller, U. (1996). Learning and memory in honeybees: From behavior to neural substrates. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19: 379–404.
Nell, H. W., Sevenster-van der Lelie, L. A., Woets, J., and van Lenteren, J. C. (1976). The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). II. Selection of host stages for oviposition and feeding by the parasite. Z. angew. Entomol. 81: 372–376.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed., WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Noldus, L. P. J. J., and van Lenteren, J. C. (1990). Host aggregation and parasitoid behaviour: Biological control in a closed system. In Mackauer, M., Ehler, L. E., and Roland, J. (Eds.), Critical Issues in Biological Control, Intercept, Andover, pp. 229–262.
Outreman, Y., Le Ralec, A., Wajnberg, E., and Pierre, J. S. (2001). Can imperfect host discrimination explain partial patch exploitation in parasitoids? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 271–280.
Outreman, Y., Le Ralec, A., Wajnberg, E., and Pierre, J. S. (2005). Effects of within- and among-patch experiences on the patch-leaving decision rules in an insect parasitoid. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 208–217.
Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (1993). Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Chapman and Hall, London.
Rodriguez-Saona, C., Crafts-Brandner, S. J., and Canas, L. A. (2003). Volatile emissions triggered by multiple herbivore damage: Beet armyworm and whitefly feeding on cotton plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 2539–2550.
Roitberg, B. D., Mangel, M., Lalonde, R. G., Roitberg, C. A., van Alphen, J. J. M., and Vet, L. (1992). Seasonal dynamic shifts in patch exploitation by parasitic wasps. Behav. Ecol. 3: 156–165.
Romeis, J., and Zebitz, C. P. W. (1997). Searching behaviour of Encarsia formosa as mediated by colour and honeydew. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 82: 299–309.
Steidle, J. L. M., and van Loon, J. J. A. (2003). Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 108: 133–148.
Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Sütterlin, S., and van Lenteren, J. C. (2000). Pre- and post-landing response of the parasitoid Encarsia formosa to whitefly hosts on Gerbera jamesonii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96: 299–307.
Takasu, K., and Lewis, W. J. (1996). The role of learning in adult food location by the larval parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Insect Behav. 9: 265–281.
Tenhumberg, B., Keller, M. A., Tyre, A. J., and Possingham, H. P. (2001). The effect of resource aggregation at different scales: optimal foraging behavior of Cotesia rubecula. Am. Nat. 158: 505–518.
Turlings, T. C. J., Bernasconi, M., Bertossa, R., Bigler, F., Caloz, G., and Dorn, S. (1998). The induction of volatile emissions in maize by three herbivore species with different feeding habits: Possible consequences for their natural enemies. Biol. Control 11: 122–129.
van Alphen, J. J. M., Bernstein, C., and Driessen, G. (2003). Information acquisition and time allocation in insect parasitoids. TREE 18: 81–87.
van Roermund, H. J. W., and van Lenteren, J. C. (1992). The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). XXXV. Life-history parameters of the greenhouse whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa as a function of host stage and temperature. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Papers 92.3: 103–147.
van Roermund, H. J. W., and van Lenteren, J. C. (1995). Residence times of the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa on tomato leaflets. J. Appl. Entomol. 119: 465–471.
van Roermund, H. J. W., Hemerik, L., and van Lenteren, J. C. (1994). Influence of intra-patch experiences and temperature on the time allocation of the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa. J. Insect Behav. 7: 483–501.
Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M. (1992). Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 141–172.
Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., and Cardé, R.T. (1995). Parasitoid foraging and learning. In Bell, W., and Cardé, R. T. (Eds.), Chemical Ecology in Insects, 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 65–101.
Vet, L. E. M. (1999). From chemical to population ecology: Infochemical use in an evolutionary context. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 31–49.
Visser, M. E., van Alphen, J. J. M., and Hemerik, L. (1992). Adaptive superparasitism and patch time allocation in solitary parasitoids—an ESS model. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 93–101.
Vos, M., Hemerik, L., and Vet, L. E. M. (1998). Patch exploitation by the parasitoids Cotesia rubecula and Cotesia glomerata in multi-patch environments with different host distributions. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 774–783.
Waage, J. K. (1979). Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by the parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 353–371.
Wajnberg, E., Curty, C., and Colazza, S. (2004). Genetic variation in the mechanisms of direct mutual interference in a parasitic wasp: Consequences in terms of patch-time allocation. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 1179–1189.
Wajnberg, E., Gonsard, P. A., Tabone, E., Curty, C., Lezcano, N., and Colazza, S. (2003). A comparative analysis of patch-leaving decision rules in a parasitoid family. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 618–626.
Wajnberg, E., Rosi, M. C., and Colazza, S. (1999). Genetic variation in patch time allocation in a parasitic wasp. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 121–133.
Wang, X. G., and Keller, M. A. (2003). Patch time allocation by the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). I. Effect of interpatch distance. J. Insect Behav. 16: 279–293.
Yin, J. C. P., Wallach, J. S., Del Vecchio, M., Wilder, E. L., Zhou, H., Quinn, W. G., and Tully, T. (1994). Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell 79: 49–58.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Mohammad Javad Ardeh and Yu Tong Qiu for standing in during some observations, and Leo Koopman, Frans van Aggelen and Andre Gidding for rearing the whitefly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burger, J.M.S., Huang, Y., Hemerik, L. et al. Flexible Use of Patch-Leaving Mechanisms in a Parasitoid Wasp. J Insect Behav 19, 155–170 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9014-7
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9014-7