Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence analysis of Taylor models and McCormick-Taylor models

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the convergence order of Taylor models and McCormick-Taylor models, namely Taylor models with McCormick relaxations as the remainder bounder, for factorable functions. Building upon the analysis of McCormick relaxations by Bompadre and Mitsos (J Glob Optim 52(1):1–28, 2012), convergence bounds are established for the addition, multiplication and composition operations. It is proved that the convergence orders of both qth-order Taylor models and qth-order McCormick-Taylor models are at least q + 1, under relatively mild assumptions. Moreover, it is verified through simple numerical examples that these bounds are sharp. A consequence of this analysis is that, unlike McCormick relaxations over natural interval extensions, McCormick-Taylor models do not result in increased order of convergence over Taylor models in general. As demonstrated by the numerical case studies however, McCormick-Taylor models can provide tighter bounds or even result in a higher convergence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adjiman C.S., Dallwig S., Floudas C.A., Neumaier A.: A global optimization method, αBB, for general twice-differentiable constrained NLPs-I. Theoretical advances. Comput. Chem. Eng. 22(9), 1137–1158 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akrotirianakis I.G., Floudas C.A.: A new class of improved convex underestimators for twice continuously differentiable constrained NLPs. J. Global. Optim. 30(4), 367–390 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alefeld G., Mayer G.: Interval analysis: theory and applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 121, 421–464 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belotti P., Lee J., Liberti L., Margot F., Wächter A.: Branching and bounds tightening techniques for nonconvex MINLP. Optim. Meth. Softw. 24(4–5), 597–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berz, M.: From Taylor series to Taylor models. In: Nonlinear Problems in Accelerator Physics, pp. 1–27. American Institute of Physics CP405 (1997)

  6. Berz M., Hoffstätter G.: Computation and application of Taylor polynomials with remainder bounds. Reliab. Comput. 4, 83–97 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berz M., Makino K.: Suppression of the wrapping effect by Taylor model-based verified integrators: Long-term stabilization by shrink wrapping. Int. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 10(4), 385–403 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bompadre A., Mitsos A.: Convergence rate of McCormick relaxations. J. Glob. Optim. 52(1), 1–28 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chachuat, B.: MC++ a versatile library for McCormick relaxations and Taylor models, version 0.7. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/people/b.chachuat (2011)

  10. Du K.S., Kearfott R.B.: The cluster problem in multivariate global optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 5(3), 253–265 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eckmann J.P., Koch H., Wittwer P.: A computer-assisted proof of universality in area-preserving maps. Mem AMS 47, 289 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gounaris C.E., Floudas C.A.: Tight convex underestimators for \({\mathcal{C}^2}\) continuous problems: II. Multivariate functions. J. Glob. Optim. 42(1), 69–89 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoefkens, J.: Rigorous numerical analysis with high-order Taylor models. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (2001)

  14. Horst R., Tuy H.: Global Optimization: Deterministic Approaches. 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kearfott R.B., Du K.S.: The cluster problem in global optimization: the univariate case. Computing 9(Suppl.), 117–127 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Y., Stadtherr M.A.: Validated solutions of initial value problems for parametric ODEs. Appl. Numer. Math. 57(10), 1145–1162 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makino, K.: Rigorous analysis of nonlinear motion in particle accelerators. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (1998)

  18. Makino K., Berz M.: Remainder differential algebras and their applications. In: Berz, M., Bishof, C., Corliss, G., Griewank, A. (eds) Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Application, and Tools, pp. 63–75. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Makino K., Berz M.: Efficient control of the dependency problem based on Taylor model methods. Reliab. Comput. 5(1), 3–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Makino K., Berz M.: Taylor models and other validated functional methods. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 4, 379–456 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Makino K., Berz M.: Suppression of the wrapping effect by Taylor model-based verified integrators: Long-term stabilization by preconditioning. Int. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 10(4), 353–384 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maranas C.D., Floudas C.A.: Global minimum potential energy conformations of small molecules. J. Glob. Optim. 4, 135–170 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McCormick G.P.: Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I—convex underestimating problems. Math. Program. 10, 147–175 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitsos A., Chachuat B., Barton P.I.: McCormick-based relaxations of algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 20(2), 573–601 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore R.E.: Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Munkres J.: Topology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Neher M., Jackson K.R., Nedialkov N.S.: On Taylor model based integration of ODEs. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45, 236–262 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Neumaier A.: Taylor forms—use and limits. Reliab. Comput. 9(1), 43–79 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neumaier A.: Complete search in continuous global optimization and constraint satisfaction. Acta Numer. 13, 271–369 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ratschek H., Rokne J.: Computer Methods for the Range of Functions. Mathematics and Its Applications. Ellis Horwood Ltd, Mathematics and Its Applications, Chichester, UK (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sahlodin A.M., Chachuat B.: Convex/concave relaxations of parametric ODEs using Taylor models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 35(5), 844–857 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schöbel A., Scholz D.: The theoretical and empirical rate of convergence for geometric branch-and-bound methods. J. Glob. Optim. 48(3), 473–495 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scholz D.: Theoretical rate of convergence for interval inclusion functions. J. Glob. Optim. 53(4), 749–767 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith E.M.B., Pantelides C.C.: A symbolic reformulation/spatial branch-and-bound algorithm for the global optimisation of nonconvex MINLPs. Comput. Chem. Eng. 23, 457–478 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tawarmalani M., Sahinidis N.V.: Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: a theoretical and computational study. Math. Program. 99(3), 563–591 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Chachuat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bompadre, A., Mitsos, A. & Chachuat, B. Convergence analysis of Taylor models and McCormick-Taylor models. J Glob Optim 57, 75–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9998-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9998-9

Keywords

Navigation