Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Adoption with Clients: The Need for Adoption Education Within the Genetic Counseling Profession

  • Professional Issues
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Genetic counselors and other health professionals may encounter adoption during any counseling session. They must be skilled in using appropriate language and understand how to approach and discuss this topic with clients. A thorough knowledge of adoption as an option for clients facing a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis is necessary when presenting individuals with non-biased information needed for informed decision-making. However, three preliminary studies have demonstrated an absence of graduate education and lack of a professional knowledge base regarding this option (Mates 2008; Oksala 2007; Perry 2003). We discuss the impact of medical professionals’ preconceptions on client decision-making, increasing early identification of fetal anomalies, deficiency of adoption knowledge and resources, and the resulting need for genetic counselors and other health professionals to develop their skills in discussing adoption with clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky, L., Hall, S., Levitan, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2001). What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: Interview & questionnaire study. British Medical Journal, 322, 463–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bijma, H. H., Wildschut, H. I. J., van der Heide, A., Passchier, J., Wladimiroff, J. W., & van der Maas, P. J. (2005). Parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of a serious foetal abnormality. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 20, 321–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borders, L. D., Penny, J. M., & Portnoy, F. (2000). Adult adoptees and their friends: Current functioning and psychosocial well-being. Family Relations, 49, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownback, S. (2008). Early help. National Review Online. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://article.nationalreview.com/372485/early-help/sam-brownback.

  • Canick, J. A., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Palomaki, G. E., Neveux, L. M., Malone, F. D., Ball, R. H., et al. (2006). Comparison of serum markers in first trimester Down syndrome screening. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 1192–1199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. C., Brown, J. B., Reid, A. J., & Pugh, P. (2000). Women’s experience of maternal serum screening. Canadian Family Physician, 46, 614–620.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007). Birth defects: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/faq1.htm.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine, & Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. (2007). 2005 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J., Schweitzer, R., & Perkoulidis, S. (2005). Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 151–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cragan, J. D., & Khoury, M. J. (2000). Effect of prenatal diagnosis on epidemiologic studies of birth defects. Epidemiology, 11, 695–699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cristofalo, E. A., Dipietro, J. A., Costigan, K. A., Nelson, P., & Crino, J. (2006). Women’s response to fetal choroid plexus cysts detected by prenatal ultrasound. Journal of Perinatology, 26, 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (1997). Benchmark adoption survey: First public opinion survey on American attitudes toward adoption. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/survey/baexec.html.

  • Finnegan, J. (1993). Shattered dreams—lonely choices: Birthparents of babies with disabilities talk about adoption. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, B. J., & Kim, C. J. (2000). Measurement of preference for information in U.S. and Korean cardiac catheterization patients. Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 310–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glidden, L. M. (1990). The wanted ones: Families adopting children with mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), Formed families: Adoption of children with handicaps (pp. 177–205). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., Bower, C., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Kurinczuk, J. J. (2005). Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Human Reproduction, 20, 328–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, A. (May 2007). Prenatal test puts Down syndrome in hard focus. New York Times. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/09/us/09down.html.

  • Helm, D. T., Miranda, S., & Chedd, N. A. (1998). Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Mothers’ reflections on supports needed from diagnosis to birth. Mental Retardation, 36, 55–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. J., & Pollack, D. (2009). Adoption in the United States: A reference for families, professionals, and students. Chicago: Lyceum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M., Pollack, D., & Lazare, A. (2006). Teaching medical students about adoption and foster care. Adoption Quarterly, 10, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. M., de Voogd, K. B., & Castañeda, H. (2005). The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: Does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Education and Counseling, 56, 302–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaunitz, A. M., Grimes, D. A., & Kaunitz, K. K. (1987). A physician’s guide to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 3537–3541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, R. H. (1996). The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the ‘gift’ of knowing. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 1545–1553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalcek, I., Huber, G., Bieniakiewitz, I., Lammers, C., Brunk, I., & Gembruch, U. (2003). The influence of gestational age on depressive reactions, stress, and anxiety of pregnant women and their partners in relation to prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24, 239–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalor, J. G., Devane, D., & Begley, C. M. (2007). Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: Women’s encounters with caregivers. Birth, 34, 80–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., & Thisted, R. A. (2005). Not all patients want to participate in decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 531–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, H. L., Steele, R., Page-Steiner, J., & Donnenfeld, A. E. (2007). Characteristics and perspectives of families waiting to adopt a child with Down syndrome. Genetics in Medicine, 9, 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, C., Hopfer, S., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: A systematic literature review. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 808–812.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau, T. M., & Dormandy, E. (2001). Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 185–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Kirmeyer, S., et al. (2007). Births: Final data for 2005. CDC National Vital Statistics Reports, 56(6), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, K. (2008). Adoption and genetic counseling: Assessing the need for adoption education. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

  • Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2002). Mean age of mother, 1970–2000. CDC National Vital Statistics Reports, 51(1), 1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoyd, J. L. (2007). Pregnancy interrupted: Loss of a desired pregnancy after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28, 37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Non-response bias in prospective studies of patients and health care professionals. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee for Adoption. (1985). Adoption factbook: United States data, issues, regulations and resources.

  • Oksala, C. (2007). Genetic counselors’ experiences with presenting adoption after a prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormality. Unpublished master’s thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA.

  • Perry, C. (2003). Special needs adoption: A website for parents facing decision and health professionals caring for them. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

  • Perry, C. L., & Henry, M. J. (2009). Family and professional considerations for adoptive parents of children with special needs. Marriage and Family Review, 45(5), 538–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P. G., Isada, N. B., Hallak, M., Johnson, M. P., Odgers, A. E., & Evans, M. I. (1992). Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80, 52–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reefhuis, J., Honein, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Correa, A., Hobbs, C. A., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2008). Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Human Reproduction. Advance Access published November 16, 2008, doi:10.1093/humrep/den387.

  • Reilly, P. R. (2009). Commentary: The federal ‘Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act.’. Prenatal Diagnosis, 29, 829–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J. A., & Groze, V. K. (1994). A longitudinal study of special-needs adoptive families. Child Welfare, 76, 689–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltvedt, S., Almström, H., Kublickas, M., Valentin, L., & Grunewald, C. (2006). Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation—a randomized controlled trial in 39, 572 pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 664–674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M., & Jones, L. C. (1996). ‘Healing fictions’: Stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal anomalies. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 353–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuth, W., Karck, U., Wilhelm, C., & Reisch, S. (1994). Parents’ needs after ultrasound diagnosis of a fetal malformation: An empirical deficit analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skotko, B. (2005a). Mothers of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal support. Pediatrics, 115, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skotko, B. (2005b). Prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome: Mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192, 670–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. K., Shaw, R. W., Slack, J., & Marteau, T. M. (1995). Training obstetricians and midwives to present screening tests: Evaluation of two brief interventions. Prenatal Diagnosis, 15, 317–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, R. P. (2002). Beyond easy answers: Prenatal diagnosis and counseling during pregnancy. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 39, 164–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. (1996). Special needs adoption: Lessons from experience. Children’s Voice. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.casanet.org/library/adoption/special-need.htm.

  • Susanne, G. O., Sissel, S., Ulla, W., Charlotta, G., & Sonja, O. L. (2006). Pregnant women’s responses to information about an increased risk of carrying a baby with Down syndrome. Birth, 33, 64–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zalm, J. E., & Byrne, P. J. (2006). Seeing baby: Women’s experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis. Journal of Perinatology, 26, 403–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verp, M. S., Bombard, A. T., Simpson, J. L., & Elias, S. (1988). Parental decision following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormality. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 29, 613–622.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., Alderson, P., & Farsides, B. (2002). Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Social Science & Medicine, 54, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra L. Perry.

Recommended Resources

Recommended Resources

The resources listed below can provide additional information about general adoption and about the adoption of children with disabilities.

Child Welfare Information Gateway

http://www.childwelfare.gov

Down Syndrome Association of Greater Cincinnati Adoption Awareness Program

http://www.dsagc.com/programs_adoption.asp

Finnegan, J. (1993). Shattered dreams—lonely choices: Birthparents of babies with disabilities talk about adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

Henry, M. J., & Pollack, D. (2009). Adoption in the United States: A reference for families, professionals, and students. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perry, C.L., Henry, M.J. Exploring Adoption with Clients: The Need for Adoption Education Within the Genetic Counseling Profession. J Genet Counsel 19, 305–314 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9288-y

Keywords

Navigation