Abstract
Behavior intervention plans (BIPs), implemented with high treatment integrity, are effective in decreasing challenging behaviors in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). High treatment integrity requires staff training such as Behavioral Skills Training (BST). Modeling and feedback alone, however, have been shown to be briefer and as effective as BST. Due to limited resources educational settings may prefer briefer training models to train staff to implement BIPs. This study used only two of the BST components, in-vivo modeling and feedback, to train three classroom staff members to implement a complex BIP. All three staff acquired the skills rapidly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardinal, J. (2012). 'Rethink autism': Effectiveness of web-based applied behavior video modeling program on the performance of paraeducators and students with autism spectrum disorder. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 73.
Catania, C. N., Almeida, D., Liu-Constant, B., & DiGennaro Reed, F. D. (2009). Video modeling to train staff to implement discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-387.
DiGennaro-Reed, F. D., Codding, R., Catania, C. N., & Maguire, H. (2010). Effects of video modeling on treatment integrity of behavioral interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-291.
Hine, K. M. (2014). Effects of behavioral skills training with directed data collection on the Acquisition of Behavioral Practices by Workers in a Private, not-for-profit child care center. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34, 223–232.
Hogan, A., Knez, N., & Kahng, S. (2015). Evaluating the use of behavioral skills training to improve school staffs’ implementation of behavior intervention plans. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9213-9.
Madzharova, M. S., Sturmey, P., & Jones, E. A. (2012). Training staff to increase manding in students with ASD: Two preliminary case studies. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 224–235.
Nigro-Bruzzi, D., & Sturmey, P. (2010). The effects of pyramidal training on staff behavior and manding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 757–761. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-757.
Pence, S. T., Peter, C. C., & Tetreault, A. S. (2012). Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 345–359.
Robinson, S. (2011). Teaching paraprofessionals of students with autism to implement pivotal response treatment in inclusive school settings using a brief video feedback training package. Focus On Autism And Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 105–118.
Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2004). The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-535.
Vladescu, J. C., Carroll, R., Paden, A., & Kodak, T. M. (2012). The effects of video modeling with voiceover instruction on accurate implementation of discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-419.
Ward-Horner, J., & Sturmey, S. (2012). Component analysis of behavior skills training in functional analysis. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 75–92.
Acknowledgements
We thank all staff who participated and welcomed us in their classroom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by the New York State Education Department to the New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (grant number MOU #98–0045).
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
The experimenters followed all the ethical guidelines for this project by submitting its protocol to both institutions associated with it. The project was reviewed by two separate Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) from Queens College and The New York State Institute For Basic Research. Both boards deemed the project "not research", which means that we did not have to collect individual consent from the staff to have them participate in the training because receiving the training was part of staff's job responsibilities.
Conflict of Interest
Maya S. Madzharova, Peter Sturmey, and J. Helen Yoo declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madzharova, M.S., Sturmey, P. & Helen Yoo, J. Using In-Vivo Modeling and Feedback to Teach Classroom Staff to Implement a Complex Behavior Intervention Plan. J Dev Phys Disabil 30, 329–337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9588-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9588-y