Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation of Manding Across Functions Prior to Functional Communication Training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether destructive behavior and manding were maintained by the same social reinforcers. A summary of 10 participants that met criteria for differentiated functional analysis and mand analysis results were included in this study. All participants were preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities who engaged in destructive behavior. All procedures were conducted in the participants’ homes by their parent with investigator coaching. Functional analyses (attention, escape, and tangible test conditions) of destructive behavior and manding were conducted within multielement designs and showed social functions. The functional analysis of destructive behavior and functional analysis of mands identified the same reinforcers for only 2 of the 10 participants. The analysis of mands identified a reinforcer that was not identified by the analysis of destructive behavior for 5 participants (over-identification), did not identify a reinforcer that was identified by the analysis of destructive behavior for 2 participants (under-identification), and identified mixed reinforcers (combination of over-identification and under-identification) for 1 participant. Results suggest that the analysis of destructive behavior and the analysis of mands identified different reinforcers and are not interchangeable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowman, L. G., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., & Piazza, C. C. (1997). On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 251–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. A., Wacker, D. P., Derby, K. M., Peck, S. M., Richman, D. M., Sasso, G. M., et al. (2000). Evaluating the effects of functional communication training in the presence and absence of establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 53–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G. & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M. & Carr, E. G. (1991). Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M. & Carr, E. G. (1992). An analysis of maintenance following functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 777–794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M. & Merges, E. (2009). Functional communication training to treat challenging behavior. In W. O'Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 320–327). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L. L., Kelley, M. E., Roane, H. S., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2008). Utility of extinction induced response variability for the selection of mands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Owen-DeSchryver, J., Iwata, B. A., & Wacker, D. P. (1997). Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 313–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Lee, J. F., & Dolezal, D. (2009). Conducting functional communication training in home settings: a case study and recommendations for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2, 21–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., Parten, M., Addison, L. R., Vorndran, C. M., Volkert, V. M., & Kodak, T. (2005). A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 303–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., et al. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. M. P., Caniglia, C., Royster, A. J., Macfarlane, E., Plowman, K., Baird, S. J., et al. (2005). Blending functional communication training and choice making to improve task engagement and decrease problem behaviour. Educational Psychology, 25, 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, D. M., Wacker, D. P., & Winborn, L. (2001). Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 73–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringdahl, J. E., Falcomata, T. S., Christensen, T. J., Bass-Ringdahl, S. M., Lentz, A., Dutt, A., et al. (2009). Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 330–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, M. J., Iwata, B. A., Kahng, S. W., Mazaleski, J. L., & Lerman, D. C. (1997). Does functional communication training compete with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement? An analysis during response acquisition and maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: a review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkert, V. M., Lerman, D. C., Call, N. A., & Trosclair-Lasserre, N. (2009). An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 145–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Steege, M. W., Northup, J., Sasso, G., Berg, W., Reimers, T., et al. (1990). A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 417–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., & Harding, J. W. (2004). Maintenance effects of functional communication training. Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Harding, J. W., Barretto, A., Rankin, B., & Ganzer, J. (2005). Treatment effectiveness, stimulus generalization, and acceptability to parents of functional communication training. Educational Psychology, 25, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Harding, J. W., & Cooper-Brown, L. J. (2009). Matching treatment to the function of destructive behavior. In P. Reed (Ed.), Behavioral theories and interventions for autism (pp. 3–21). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Harding, J. W., & Cooper-Brown, L. J. (in press). Functional and structural approaches to behavioral assessment of problem behavior. In W. Fisher, C. Piazza & H. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winborn, L., Wacker, D. P., Richman, D. M., Asmus, J., & Geier, D. (2002). Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 295–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Wacker, D. P., & Kitsukawa, K. (2009). A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 185–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly M. Schieltz.

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant RO1- HD029402 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position of policy of that agency. The authors express our appreciation to Agnes DeRaad for assistance with manuscript preparation.

The first author completed an earlier version of this manuscript to fulfill University of Iowa Ed.S. requirements for a Ph.D. degree in School Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schieltz, K.M., Wacker, D.P., Harding, J.W. et al. An Evaluation of Manding Across Functions Prior to Functional Communication Training. J Dev Phys Disabil 22, 131–147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9181-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9181-5

Keywords

Navigation