Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently associated with neurological complications, limiting its value as a less invasive procedure. The routine use of EMG neuromonitoring has been inadequate to detect iatrogenic injuries; significant postoperative deficits have gone undetected by EMG. An effective way to monitor for these intraoperative neurological events is not yet well established. To our knowledge, detection of lumbar plexus injury during LLIF by trans-cranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) without corresponding change in EMG has not been reported in the literature. Three cases are presented to illustrate the potential utility of trans-cranial MEP monitoring during trans-psoas LLIF. We introduce a modified intraoperative neuro-monitoring (IONM) protocol for LLIF surgery, which includes MEP in addition to spontaneous and triggered EMG. Postoperative neurological outcome was correlated with the IONM findings. In each case, loss of quadriceps MEP signals occurred during LLIF at L4/L5, and after prolonged retraction (27, 25 and 61 min respectively). The EMG, however, did not show any abnormal activity. Two patients had post-operative quadriceps weakness, concordant with MEP data. The third patient, in whom the MEP signals returned to normal after expeditious removal of the retractor, did not exhibit quadriceps weakness, also concordant with MEP data. These cases contribute to the developing perception that stand-alone EMG nerve monitoring is not adequate for trans-psoas surgery. The addition of MEP may improve the sensitivity of IONM during trans-psoas surgery. Multimodality IONM may offer the opportunity to intervene on evolving iatrogenic nerve injuries, and may reduce the incidence of adverse postoperative findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cahill KS, Martinez JL, Wang MY, Vanni S, Levi AD. Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY. An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sofianos DA, Briseño MR, Abrams J, Patel A. Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1621–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD. Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simpson AK, Harrod C, White AP. Lateral lumbar trans-psoas interbody fusion. Tech Orthop. 2011;26:156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moro T, Kikuchi S-I, Konno S-I, Yaginuma H. An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine. 2003;28:423–8 (discussion 427–8).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Houten JK, Alexandre LC, Nasser R, Wollowick AL. Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:280–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyon R, Lieberman JA, Feiner J, Burch S. Relative efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically-elicited electromyography, and evoked EMG to assess nerve root function during sustained retraction in a porcine model. Spine. 2009;34:E558–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skinner SA, Transfeldt EE, Savik K. Surface electrodes are not sufficient to detect neurotonic discharges: observations in a porcine model and clinical review of deltoid electromyographic monitoring using multiple electrodes. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macdonald DB, Stigsby B, Al Homoud I, Abalkhail T, Mokeem A. Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29:118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leppanen RE. Intraoperative monitoring of segmental spinal nerve root function with free-run and electrically-triggered electromyography and spinal cord function with reflexes and F-responses. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2005;19:437–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lieberman JA, Lyon R, Feiner J, Hu SS, Berven SH. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine. 2008;33:E414–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Katiri Wagner for her help in preparing the manuscript. No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript. Approval by the authors’ institutional review board (IRB) was obtained (Protocol#: 2012-P-000317/3;BIDMC).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kshitij Chaudhary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhary, K., Speights, K., McGuire, K. et al. Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Monit Comput 29, 549–554 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9713-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9713-8

Keywords

Navigation