Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Continuous measurement of cardiac output with the electrical velocimetry method in patients under spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to continuously measure cardiac output (CO) with the electrical velocimetry (EV) method and characterize the hemodynamic profile of patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery (CD), and to discuss the potential benefit of using real time CO monitoring to guide patient management. Forty-two patients scheduled for elective CD under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this observational study. A non-invasive CO monitor incorporating the electrical velocimetry algorithm, ICON® (Cardiotronic®, La Jolla, California, USA), was used to measure CO and stroke volume (SV) continuously. Peripheral venous pressure was measured intermittently at pre-defined time points. Systemic vascular resistance was calculated retrospectively after completion of the study. Hemodynamic changes at pre-defined time points and caused by phenylephrine administration were analyzed. Hypotension (MAP reduction more than 20 % from baseline values) occurred in 71.1 % of patients after spinal anesthesia, while the coinstantaneous CO was increased ≥20 % from baseline in the majority of patients (76.3 %) at the same time. Significant increase in CO took place at 3–2 min before the administration of phenylephrine bolus. Treatment of hypotension with phenylephrine was associated with significant decrease in CO. Continuous CO monitoring with EV enables clinicians to determine CO and SV changes prior to onset of hypotension and to better understand patients’ hemodynamics. It is an important addition to the current monitoring. The benefit of routinely using this technique remains to be determined in term of the patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Habib AS. A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:377–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Schenker CA. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in regional anesthesia: a review. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:530–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D, Arcache MJ, Hodges O, Lombard CJ, Greenwood J, James MF. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:753–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Langesaeter E, Dyer RA. Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt C, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E, Hoffmeier A, Meissner A. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mekis D, Kamenik M, Starc V, Jeretin S. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H. Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:88–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raue W, Swierzy M, Koplin G, Schwenk W. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transthoracic thermodilution technique for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:1067–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zoremba N, Bickenbach J, Krauss B, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R, Schalte G. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:1314–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Osthaus WA, Huber D, Beck C, Winterhalter M, Boethig D, Wessel A, Sumpelmann R. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transpulmonary thermodilution for measuring cardiac output in piglets. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:749–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernstein DP, Lemmens HJ. Stroke volume equation for impedance cardiography. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005;43:443–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein DP, Osypka MJ (2003) Apparatus and method for determining an approximation of the stroke volume and the cardiac output of the heart. United States Patent 6511438.

  15. Archer TL, Conrad BE, Suresh P, Tarsa M. Electrical velocimetry demonstrates the increase in cardiac output and decrease in systemic vascular resistance accompanying cesarean delivery and oxytocin administration. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:79–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Archer TL. Electrical velocimetry elucidates the hemodynamics of hypertension caused by indigo carmine. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:166–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Archer TL, Suresh P, Shapiro AE. Cardiac output measurement, by means of electrical velocimetry, may be able to determine optimum maternal position during gestation, labour and caesarean delivery, by preventing vena caval compression and maximising cardiac output and placental perfusion pressure. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:308–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Park SY, Cui J, Lee JH, Cho SH, Chae WS, Jin HC, Hwang KH. Peripheral venous pressure as an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:305–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tugrul M, Camci E, Pembeci K, Al-Darsani A, Telci L. Relationship between peripheral and central venous pressures in different patient positions, catheter sizes, and insertion sites. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:446–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen PE, Erickson JR, Abouleish EI, Perriatt S, Sheppard C. Fetal heart rate changes after intrathecal sufentanil or epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia: incidence and clinical significance. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:742–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu ZY, Lumbers ER. Measurement of baroreceptor-mediated effects on heart rate variability in fetal sheep. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:856–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tihtonen K, Koobi T, Yli-Hankala A, Uotila J. Maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery assessed by whole-body impedance cardiography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:355–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1230–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Landzberg JS, Parker JD, Gauthier DF, Colucci WS. Effects of myocardial alpha 1-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on contractility in humans. Circulation. 1991;84:1608–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dyer RA, Reed AR. Spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery: closer to a solution. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1093–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Magder S. Phenylephrine and tangible bias. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:211–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thiele RH, Nemergut EC, Lynch C 3rd. The physiologic implications of isolated alpha (1) adrenergic stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:284–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown BR Jr. Selective venoconstriction by dopamine in comparision with isoproterenol and phenylephrine. Anesthesiology. 1975;43:570–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cannesson M, Jian Z, Chen G, Vu TQ, Hatib F. Effects of phenylephrine on cardiac output and venous return depend on the position of the heart on the Frank-Starling relationship. J Appl Physiol. 1985;113:281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors sincerely thank Dr. Donald P. Bernstein, Cardiovascular Engineering Sotera Wireless, Inc. San Diego, CA for his editing of this article. This project is funded by the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Conflict of interest

The ICON® monitor was provided by Cardiotronic-Osypka Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

    Yanhong Liu

  2. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Jackson 422, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Yanhong Liu, May C. M. Pian-Smith, Lisa R. Leffert, Rebecca D. Minehart, Andrea Torri, Charles Coté, Robert M. Kacmarek & Yandong Jiang

  3. Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Robert M. Kacmarek

Authors
  1. Yanhong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. May C. M. Pian-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa R. Leffert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rebecca D. Minehart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Torri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charles Coté
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert M. Kacmarek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yandong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yandong Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Pian-Smith, M.C.M., Leffert, L.R. et al. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with the electrical velocimetry method in patients under spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. J Clin Monit Comput 29, 627–634 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9645-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9645-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation