Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continuous transthoracic echocardiographic monitoring for changes in maternal cardiac hemodynamics during cesarean section under combined epidural–spinal anesthesia: a prospective, observational study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The change in maternal hemodynamics during cesarean section has not been well studied. Continuous transthoracic echocardiography can monitor cardiac function continuously. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of maternal hemodynamic parameters monitoring during cesarean section using continuous transthoracic echocardiography. In this prospective, observational study, women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean section at term under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Maternal hemodynamic parameters were assessed by continuous transthoracic echocardiography at 11 pre-set time points. The image quality of continuous transthoracic echocardiography was evaluated before measurement was performed. Totally, one hundred parturients were recruited, and transthoracic echocardiography images with sufficient quality for further analysis were obtained in 72 women. Following anesthesia, maternal heart rate decreased by 11.18% and cardiac output decreased by 7.82%, but stroke volume remained stable. After delivery of the neonate and placenta, stroke volume and cardiac output increased by 21.09% and 22.33%, respectively. End-diastolic volume also increased significantly after delivery of the neonate, but end-systolic volume was unchanged. Following delivery of the neonate, fractional shortening increased till the end of the cesarean section while total peripheral resistance decreased significantly. In conclusion, continuous transthoracic echocardiographic monitoring revealed that there were significant changes in hemodynamic parameters during cesarean section after delivery of the newborn and placenta, which warranted further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. van Oppen AC, van der Tweel I, Alsbach GP, Heethaar RM, Bruinse HW. A longitudinal study of maternal hemodynamics during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(1):40–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter S, Robson SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Br Heart J. 1992;68(6):540–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;130(12):1003–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(5):856–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Pian-Smith MC, Leffert LR, Minehart RD, Torri A, Coté C, Kacmarek RM, Jiang Y. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with the electrical velocimetry method in patients under spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(5):627–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tihtonen K, Kööbi T, Yli-Hankala A, Uotila J. Maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery assessed by whole-body impedance cardiography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(4):355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1230–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ram M, Lavie A, Lev S, Blecher Y, Amikam U, Shulman Y, Avnon T, Weiner E, Many A. Cardiac hemodynamics before, during and after elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in low-risk women. J Perinatol. 2017;37(7):793–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mon W, Stewart A, Fernando R, Ashpole K, El-Wahab N, MacDonald S, Tamilselvan P, Columb M, Liu YM. Cardiac output changes with phenylephrine and ephedrine infusions during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Clin Anesth. 2017;37:43–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D, Arcache MJ, Hodges O, Lombard CJ, Greenwood J, James MF. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(4):753–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka H, Tanaka K, Tsuji M, Magawa S, Hatano F, Nii M, Ikeda T. Non-invasive monitoring of the cardiac effects of continuous intravenous oxytocin infusion during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;139:251–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosseland LA, Hauge TH, Grindheim G, Stubhaug A, Langesæter E. Changes in blood pressure and cardiac output during cesarean delivery: the effects of oxytocin and carbetocin compared with placebo. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(3):541–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabow S, Olofsson P. Pulse wave analysis by digital photoplethysmography to record maternal hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia, delivethry of the baby, and intravenous oxytocin during cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(7):759–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas JS, Koh SH, Cooper GM. Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin given as i.v. bolus or infusion on women undergoing Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(1):116–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zieleskiewicz L, Noel A, Duclos G, Haddam M, Delmas A, Bechis C, Loundou A, Blanc J, Mignon A, Bouvet L, Einav S, Bourgoin A, Leone M. Can point-of-care ultrasound predict spinal hypotension during caesarean section? A prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zieleskiewicz L, Bouvet L, Einav S, Duclos G, Leone M. Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound: applications in obstetric anaesthetic management. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(10):1265–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Easterling TR, Watts DH, Schmucker BC, Benedetti TJ. Measurement of cardiac output during pregnancy: validation of Doppler technique and clinical observations in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(6):845–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robson SC, Dunlop W, Moore M, Hunter S. Combined Doppler and echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: theory and application in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94(11):1014–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Song H, Tsai SK, Liu J. Tailored holder for continuous echocardiographic monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):435–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramsingh D, Rinehart J, Kain Z, Strom S, Canales C, Alexander B, Capatina A, Ma M, Le KV, Cannesson M. Impact assessment of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound training on anesthesiology residents. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):670–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Royse CF. Ultrasound-guided haemodynamic state assessment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robson SC, Boys RJ, Hunter S, Dunlop W. Maternal hemodynamics after normal delivery and delivery complicated by postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(2):234–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee W, Rokey R, Miller J, Cotton DB. Maternal hemodynamic effects of uterine contractions by M-mode and pulsed-Doppler echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(4):974–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Dong Y. Preoperative music intervention for patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(1):81–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zdanowicz JA, Utz AC, Bernasconi I, Geier S, Corti R, Beinder E. “Broken heart” after cesarean delivery. Case report and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(4):687–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Crimi E, Baggish A, Leffert L, Pian-Smith MC, Januzzi JL, Jiang Y. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Acute reversible stress-induced cardiomyopathy associated with cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Circulation. 2008;117(23):3052–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cornette J, Laker S, Jeffery B, Lombaard H, Alberts A, Rizopoulos D, Roos-Hesselink JW, Pattinson RC. Validation of maternal cardiac output assessed by transthoracic echocardiography against pulmonary artery catheterization in severely ill pregnant women: prospective comparative study and systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE medical technology guidance 3 – CardioQ-ODM oesophageal Doppler monitor; March 30, 2011. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/MTG3.

  29. Dennis AT, Stenson A. The use of transthoracic echocardiography in postpartum hypotension. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(5):1033–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dennis AT. Transthoracic echocardiography in obstetric anaesthesia and obstetric critical illness. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(2):160–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dennis AT, Castro J, Carr C, Simmons S, Permezel M, Royse C. Haemodynamics in women with untreated pre-eclampsia. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(10):1105–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Arora G, Morss AM, Piazza G, Ryan JW, Diwoodey DL, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ, Chuang ML. Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction using teichholz formula and volumetric methods by cmr: implications for patient stratification and selection of therapy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:202. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-P202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petersen JW, Liu J, Chi YY, Lingis M, Williams RS, Rhoton-Vlasak A, Segal MS, Conrad KP. Comparison of multiple non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women. Physiol Rep. 2017;5(8):e13223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ellen Knapp, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for improving the scientific English writing of this manuscript.

Funding

Dr. Han Huang received funding support from Chengdu Bureau of Science and Technology (2019-YFYF-00108-SN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approved by the ethics committee of West china hospital of Sichuan university (2013(201)).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all parturients before enrollment.

Consent to publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, Z., Feng, S., Song, H. et al. Continuous transthoracic echocardiographic monitoring for changes in maternal cardiac hemodynamics during cesarean section under combined epidural–spinal anesthesia: a prospective, observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 36, 1387–1396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00777-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00777-y

Keywords

Navigation