Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intravenous and Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement: A Two-Way Road. Optimizing Healthcare Quality in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the alternate use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) in a third-level Pediatric University Hospital.

Methods

Retrospective study of all patients receiving SCIG from 2006 to 2012. Data collected included demographics, date SCIG was started, date of switch to IVIG and reasons, administration tolerance, and related adverse events. Effectiveness was defined as the lack of severe infections.

Results

Twenty-three patients (15 male, 8 female) with PID were studied. SCIG was initiated at a median age of 14.2 years (8.4 months-25.7 years) and median duration on SCIG treatment was 41 months (4-68). Nine patients (39.1%) temporarily switched from SCIG to IVIG for the following reasons: vacation (8), administration issues (1), and transient need for immunomodulatory therapy (1). A mean of 5.2 IVIG infusions/patient (SD=2.86) was administered while on SCIG. IVIG-related adverse events were documented in 3 patients with 6 infusions. Eight (34.8%) patients definitively discontinued SCIG use for the following reasons: convenience (5), adverse effects (1), coagulopathy (1), and autoimmune thrombocytopenia (1). There were no severe infections requiring hospital admission in any patient during the study period.

Conclusions

Alternating SCIG and IVIG use in patients with PID was associated with considerable advantages in terms of convenience for the patients and their caregivers, while maintaining the effectiveness and safety of this therapy. Healthcare units treating these patients should show flexibility with this dual therapy in order to optimize patients’ quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gardulf A. Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route. BioDrugs. 2007;21:105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardulf A, Hammarström L, Smith CI. Home treatment of hypogammaglobulinaemia with subcutaneous gammaglobulin by rapid infusion. Lancet. 1991;338:162–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen S, Gustafson R, Smith CI, Gardulf A. Express subcutaneous IgG infusions: decreased time of delivery with maintained safety. Clin Immunol. 2002;104:237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballow M, Notarangelo L, Grimbacher B, Cunningham-Rundles C, Stein M, Helbert M, et al. Immunodeficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;158 Suppl 1:14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. European Society for Immunodeficiencies. PID Care in Development. [Consultado el 8 de Abril de 2014]. Available in http://dev.esid.org/pid-care-pid-care-in-development-wp-news-at-esid-fall-2012-472-0

  6. European Society for Immunodeficiencies. Additional Statistics. [Consultado el 30 de noviembre de 2013]. Available in http://esid.org/Working-Parties/Registry/ESID-Database-Statistics

  7. Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Böck A, Carvalho BC, et al. Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies—a prospective, multi-national study. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26:177–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chouksey A, Duff K, Wasserbauer N, Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin-g replacement therapy with preparations currently available in the United States for intravenous or intramuscular use: reasons and regimens. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2005;1(3):120–30.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Melamed I, McDonald A, Neff A, Beck A. An analysis of safety and tolerability data on 10 %, 16 %, and 20 % formulations of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IGSC). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:AB16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore ML, Quinn JM. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy for primary antibody deficiency: advancements into the 21st century. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:114–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stiehm ER. Human intravenous immunoglobulin in primary and secondary antibody deficiencies. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:696–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger M, Rojavin M, Kiessling P, Zenker O. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous immunoglobulin and their use in dosing of replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2011;139(2):133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lingman-Framme J, Fasth A. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: an evidence-based review. Drugs. 2013;73(12):1307–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shapiro RS. Why I, use subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). J Clin Immunol. 2013;33 Suppl 2:S95–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Torgerson TR. Overview of routes of IgG administration. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33 Suppl 2:S87–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserman RL. Progress in gammaglobulin therapy for immunodeficiency: from subcutaneous to intravenous infusions and back again. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(6):1153–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abolhassani H, Sadaghiani MS, Aghamohammadi A, Ochs HD, Rezaei N. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin versus hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of primary antibody deficiencies: systematic review and meta analysis. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(6):1180–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Böck A, et al. Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IG self-infusions at home. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:936–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berger M, Murphy E, Riley P, Bergman GE. Improved quality of life, immunoglobulin G levels, and infection rates in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases during self-treatment with subcutaneous immunoglobulin G. South Med J. 2010;103(9):856–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolay U, Kiessling P, Berger M, Gupta S, Yel L, Roifman CM, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26:65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fasth A, Nyström J. Quality of life and health-care resource utilization among children with primary immunodeficiency receiving home treatment with subcutaneous human immunoglobulin. J Clin Immunol. 2008;28:370–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann F, Grimbacher B, Thiel J, Peter HH, Belohradsky BH. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin G replacement therapy under real-life conditions in children and adults with antibody deficiency. Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:238–45.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Torgerson T, Bonagura V, Shapiro R. Clinical ambiguities—ongoing questions. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33 Suppl 2:S99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torgerson T. Comparing routes of IgG administration for primary immunodeficiency disorders. Clin Immunol. 2013;33 Suppl 2:S85–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maroto Hernando M, Soler-Palacín P, Martin-Nalda N, Oliveras Arenas M, Español Boren T, Figueras NC. Subcutaneous gammaglobulin in common variable immunodeficiency: first experience in Spain. An Pediatr. 2009;70:111–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaspar J, Gerritsen B, Jones A. Immunoglobulin replacement treatment by rapid subcutaneous infusion. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wasserman RL, Irani AM, Tracy J, Tsoukas C, Stark D, Levy R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous immune globulin (human), 10 % caprylate/chromatography purified in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;161:518–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank all the patients and their families for their contribution, and Celine Cavallo for English language support.

P.S.P. and A.F.P. participated in conducting the study and in writing and reviewing the manuscript, I.G.G. participated in writing and reviewing the manuscript, A.M.N. contributed to conducting the study and reviewing the manuscript, M.O.A. and C.F.N. reviewed the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the text submitted.

Author Disclosure Statement

Pere Soler-Palacín has received several grants from CSL Behring and has participated as principal investigator in clinical trials by Baxter, Octapharma, and CSL Behring.

Conflict of Interest

All the other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pere Soler-Palacín.

Additional information

This study was funded by a grant (Ig-MAPS 2012) from CSL Behring.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soler-Palacín, P., Gasó-Gago, I., Fernández-Polo, A. et al. Intravenous and Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement: A Two-Way Road. Optimizing Healthcare Quality in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies. J Clin Immunol 34, 1015–1017 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0096-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0096-2

Keywords

Navigation