References
Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M, Subcutaneous Ig GSG. Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26(3):265–73.
Berger M. Choices in IgG replacement therapy for primary immune deficiency diseases: subcutaneous IgG vs. intravenous IgG and selecting an optimal dose. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;11(6):532–8.
Chapel HM, Spickett GP, Ericson D, Engl W, Eibls MM, Bjorkander J. The comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravenous versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. J Clin Immunol. 2000;20(2):94–100.
Ballow M. Immunoglobulin therapy: methods of delivery. The J of allergy and clin immunol. 2008;122(5):1038–9.
Haddad E, Barnes D, Kafal A. Home therapy with subcutaneous immunoglobulins for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Transfusion and apheresis science : official j of the World Apher Assoc : official j of the Eur Soc for Haemapheresis. 2012;46(3):315–21.
Wasserman RL. Progress in gammaglobulin therapy for immunodeficiency: from subcutaneous to intravenous infusions and back again. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(6):1153–64.
Eibl MM. History of immunoglobulin replacement. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2008;28(4):737–64.
Orbach H, Katz U, Sherer Y, Shoenfeld Y. Intravenous immunoglobulin: adverse effects and safe administration. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005;29(3):173–84.
Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR, Ballow M, Berger M, Bonilla FA, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence by members of the primary immunodeficiency committee of the american academy of allergy, asthma and immunology. The J of allergy and clin immunol. 2006;117(4 Suppl):S525–53.
Kobrynski L. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy: a new option for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Biologics : targets & ther. 2012;6:277–87.
Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, et al. Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. The J of allergy and clin immunol. 2004;114(4):936–42.
Nicolay U, Kiessling P, Berger M, Gupta S, Yel L, Roifman CM, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunedeficiency diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26(1):65–72.
Fasth A, Nystrom J. Quality of life and health-care resource utilization among children with primary immunodeficiency receiving home treatment with subcutaneous human immunoglobulin. J Clin Immunol. 2008;28(4):370–8.
Ducruet T, Levasseur MC, Des Roches A, Kafal A, Dicaire R, Haddad E. Pharmacoeconomic advantages of subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in a Canadian pediatric center. The J of allergy and clin immunol. 2013;131(2):585–7. e1-3.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician ± patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651–61.
Stevensona FA, Barry CA, Brittenb N, Barberc N, Bradley CP. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(6):829–40.
Acknowledgments
Elie Haddad is a scholar of Fonds de la Recherche en Santé au Québec (FRQS).
Funding
Funds to hire a native English speaker to help with editing the final version of the manuscript was provided by CSL Behring. The authors did not work for CSL Behring and CSL Behring was not involved in the design of the study or writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samaan, K., Levasseur, M.C., Decaluwe, H. et al. SCIg vs IVIg: Let’s Give Patients the Choice!. J Clin Immunol 34, 611–614 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0057-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0057-9