Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibodies to Mitotic Spindle Apparatus: Clinical Significance of NuMA and HsEg5 Autoantibodies

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The clinical associations of NuMA and HsEg5 antibodies, the main anti-mitotic spindle apparatus autoantibodies, remain unclear due to their extremely low prevalence.

Patients and Methods

We have analysed the clinical data of 40 anti-NuMA- (0.87‰) and 7 anti-HsEg5- (0.15‰) positive patients detected during routine immunofluorescence examination of 45,804 sera. NuMA reactivity was further confirmed by immunoblotting.

Results

Antibodies to HsEg5 did not associate with any specific pathology. NuMA positivity associated with a diagnosis of connective tissue disease (CTD) in 18 patients (45%), primary Sjögren or sicca syndrome and undifferentiated connective tissue disease being the most represented. Seven patients (17.5%) were diagnosed with different organ-specific autoimmune diseases, whereas in the other 15 patients (37.5%), no autoimmune pathology could be documented.

Conclusions

Therefore, although both anti-mitotic spindle apparatus antibodies are not associated to a defined autoimmune pathology, the presence of NuMA antibodies, mainly at high titers, may be an indication for a more extensive screening of CTD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rattner JB, Mack GJ, Fritzler MJ. Autoantibodies to components of the mitotic apparatus. Mol Biol Rep. 1998;25:143–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarty GA, Valencia DW, Fritzler MJ, Barada FA. A unique antinuclear antibody staining only the mitotic spindle apparatus (letter). New Engl J Med. 1981;305:703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrade LE, Chan EK, Peebles CL, Tan EM. Two major autoantigen–antibody systems of the mitotic spindle apparatus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1643–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead CM, Winkfein RJ, Fritzler MJ, Rattner JB. The spindle kinesin-like protein HsEg5 is an autoantigen in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1635–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lydersen BK, Pettijohn DE. Human-specific nuclear protein that associates with the polar region of the mitotic apparatus: distribution in a human/hamster hybrid cell. Cell 1980;22:489–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tousson A, Zeng C, Brinkley BR, Valdivia MM. Centrophilin: A novel mitotic spindle protein involved in microtubule nucleation. J Cell Biol. 1991;112:427–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kallajoki M, Weber K, Osborn M. A 210 kDa nuclear matrix protein is a functional part of the mitotic spindle; a microinjection study using SPN monoclonal antibodies. EMBO J. 1991;10:3351–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maekawa T, Leslie R, Kuriyama R. Identification of a minus end-specific microtubule-associated protein located at the mitotic poles in cultured mammalian cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 1991;54:255–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Price CM, McCarty GA, Pettijohn DE. NuMA protein is a human autoantigen. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:774–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Auer-Grumbach P, Achleitner B. Epidemiology and clinical associations of NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein) autoantibodies. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:1779–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grypiotis P, Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Winzler C, Radu C, Zampieri S, et al. Significato clinico dei quadri fluoroscopici specifici per il fuso mitotico in pazienti affetti da malattie reumatiche. Reumatismo 2002;54:232–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonaci-Nikolic B, Andrejevic S, Bukilica M, Urosevic I, Nikolic M. Autoantibodies to mitotic apparatus: Association with other autoantibodies and their clinical significance. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26:438–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Claus R, Lenschow U, Külz T, Kotitschke A, Meiske D, Thiesen HJ, et al. Congenital heart block associated with a maternal anti-HsEg5-like autoantibody. Rheumatology 2005;44:693–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Claus R, Hickstein H, Külz T, Lenschow U, Meiske D, Kotitscke A, et al. Identification and management of fetuses at risk for, or affected by, congenital heart block associated with autoantibodies to SSA (Ro), SSB (La), or an HsEg5-like autoantigen. Rheumatol Int. 2006;26:886–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lind K, Hoier-Madsen M, Wiik A. Autoantibodies to the mitotic spindle apparatus in Mycoplasma pneumoniae disease. Infect Immun. 1988;56:714–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen BU, Eriksson S, Lindgren S. High prevalence of autoimmune liver disease in patients with multiple nuclear dot, anti-centromere, and mitotic spindle antibodies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;26:707–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lonzetti SL, Joyal F, Raynauld JP, Roussin A, Goulet JR, Rich E, et al. Updating the American College of Rheumatology preliminary classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: addition of severe nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities markedly increases the sensitivity for limited scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:735–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexandre EL, Carsons SE, et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren´s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American–European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:554–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fries JF, Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Summary. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1135–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, Bacon PA, Churg J, Gross WL, et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:187–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Asociación Lúpicos de Asturias (Association of lupus patients of Asturias, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lourdes Mozo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mozo, L., Gutiérrez, C. & Gómez, J. Antibodies to Mitotic Spindle Apparatus: Clinical Significance of NuMA and HsEg5 Autoantibodies. J Clin Immunol 28, 285–290 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-008-9170-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-008-9170-y

Keywords

Navigation