Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Unpacking the Term “Self-Management”: Understanding Intervention Applications Within the School-Based Literature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although extensive research has supported the effectiveness of self-management interventions to improve student behavior, variability in the specific components used in self-management interventions remains. The purpose of the current paper was to analyze the extant literature in order to (a) define the various ways in which self-management interventions have been developed and evaluated, and (b) understand the effectiveness of specific, commonly utilized intervention approaches. In order to achieve this goal, we conducted a systematic review of the single-case literature on the use of self-management interventions to support student behavior. Within the 56 studies reviewed, eight primary approaches to self-management were utilized across more than one study. Prompted self-monitoring was the most frequently used configuration (N = 23); however, the use of self-monitoring plus reinforcement based on both accuracy and performance (N = 6) and prompted self-monitoring plus graphing (N = 5) were also common. Although strong mean effect sizes were identified across intervention configurations, there was also often a substantial degree of effect size heterogeneity. This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in characteristics such as who the intervention was carried out with (e.g., grade level, disability status) or in what setting (e.g., general versus special education). Implications for selecting self-management configurations, as well as conducting future research, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*Indicates study included in meta-analysis

  • Abramson, J. H. (2011). WINPEPI updated: Computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 8, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Amato-Zech, N. A., Hoff, K. E., & Doepke, K. J. (2006). Increasing on-task behavior in the classroom: Extension of self-monitoring strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Barry, L. M., & Messer, J. J. (2003). A practical application of self-management for students diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beretvas, S. N., & Chung, H. (2008). A review of single-subject design meta-analyses: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Blick, D. W., & Test, D. W. (1987). Effects of self-recording on high-school students’ on-task behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Boyle, J. R., & Hughes, C. A. (1994). Effects of self-monitoring and subsequent fading of external prompts on the on-task behavior and task productivity of elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briesch, A. M., & Briesch, J. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management interventions in single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briesch, A. M., Briesch, J. M., & Mahoney, C. (2014). Reported use and acceptability of self-management interventions to target behavioral outcomes. Contemporary School Psychology, 18, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Defining behavioral self-management: A review and analysis of the literature 1988–2008. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Briesch, A. M., & Daniels, B. (2013). Using self-management interventions to address general education behavioral needs: Assessment of effectiveness and feasibility. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Broden, M., Hall, R. V., & Mitts, B. (1971). The effect of self-recording on the classroom behavior of two eighth-grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 191–199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Brooks, A., Todd, A. W., Tofflemoyer, S., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work completion. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, A., McDaniel, S., & Kreigh, C. (2015). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bruhn, A., & Watt, S. (2012). Improving behavior by using multicomponent self-monitoring within a targeted reading intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 38, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busacca, M. L., Anderson, A., & Moore, D. W. (2015). Self-management for primary school students demonstrating problem behavior in regular classrooms: Evidence review of single-case design research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Clees, T. J. (1994–95). Self-recording of students’ daily schedules of teachers’ expectancies: Perspectives on reactivity, stimulus control, and generalization. Exceptionality, 5, 113–129.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Crawley, S. H., Lynch, P., & Vannest, K. (2006). The use of self-monitoring to reduce off-task behavior and cross-correlation examination of weekends and absences as an antecedent to off-task behavior. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 28, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Crutchfield, S. A., Mason, R. A., Chambers, A., Wills, H. P., & Mason, B. A. (2015). Use of a self-monitoring application to reduce stereotypic behavior in adolescents with Autism: A preliminary investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1146–1155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Dalton, T., Martella, R. C., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). The effects of a self-management program in reducing off-task behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Davis, T. N., Dacus, S., Bankhead, J., Haupert, M., Fuentes, L., & Zoch, T. (2014). A comparison of self-monitoring with and without reinforcement to improve on-task classroom behavior. Journal of School Counseling, 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., Mason, B. A., Davis, H. S., Mason, R. A., & Crutchfield, S. A. (2016). Self-monitoring interventions for students with ASD: A meta-analysis of school-based research. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Edwards, L., Salant, V., Howard, V. F., Brougher, J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1995). Effectiveness of self-management on attentional behavior and reading comprehension for children with Attention Deficit Disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 17, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Fantuzzo, J., Harrell, K., & McLeod, M. (1979). Across-subject generalization of attending behavior as a function of self-regulation training. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., Cook, D. M., & Quinn, G. (1988). An evaluation of the effectiveness of teacher- vs. student-management classroom interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Azar, S. T. (1987). A component analysis of behavioral self-management interventions with elementary school students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 9, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Finn, L., Ramasamy, R., Dukes, C., & Scott, J. (2015). Using WatchMinder to increase the on-task behavior of students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 1408–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geomatix. (2007). XY digitizer. Retrieved September 15, 2017, from http://www.geomatix.net/xyit

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, NY: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Graham-Day, K. J., Gardner, R., & Hsin, Y. (2010). Increasing on-task behaviors of high school students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Is it enough? Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Guerasko-Moore, S., DuPaul, G. J., & White, G. P. (2006). The effects of self-management in general education classrooms on the organizational skills of adolescents with ADHD. Behavior Modification, 30, 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Guerasko-Moore, S., DuPaul, G. J., & White, G. P. (2007). Self-management of classroom preparedness and homework: Effects on school functioning of adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Review, 36, 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kneedler, R. D., & Marshall, K. J. (1982). A comparison of the effects of self- versus teacher-assessment of on-task behavior. Behavior Therapy, 13, 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. R. (1986). Self-monitoring of attentional behavior versus self-monitoring of productivity: Effects on on-task behavior and academic response rate among learning disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 417–423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B. D., & Saddler, B. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Reid, R., McElory, K., & Hamby, R. S. (1994). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replication and cross-task replication studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Hoff, K. E., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Reducing disruptive behavior in general education classrooms: The use of self-management strategies. School Psychology Review, 27, 290–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Holifield, C., Goodman, J., Hazelkorn, M., & Heflin, L. J. (2010). Using self-monitoring to increase attending to task and academic accuracy in children with Autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Houghton, S. (1989). Improving social behavior and academic performance of a secondary school pupil through self-recording: A replication of Merrett and Blundell. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Education, 9, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hughes, C. A., & Hendrickson, J. M. (1987). Self-monitoring with at-risk students in the regular class setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. A., Korinek, L., & Gorman, J. (1991). Self-management for students with mental retardation in public school settings: A research review. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculations. In C. Neuringer & J. L. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2010). Single case designs technical documentation. In What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and Standards Handbook (version 2.0). Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/229.

  • Lee, S., Simpson, R. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2007). Effects and implications of self-management for students with Autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Legge, D. B., DeBar, R. M., & Alber-Morgan, S. R. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring with a MotivAider on the on-task behavior of fifth and sixth graders with Autism and other disabilities. JBAIC, 1, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Levendoski, L. S., & Cartledge, G. (2000). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with serious emotional disturbances: Classroom applications for increased academic responding. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • *Lloyd, J. W., Bateman, D. F., Landrum, T. J., & Hallahan, D. P. (1989). Self-recording of attention versus productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 315–323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Lloyd, J. W., Hallahan, D. P., Kosiewicz, M. M., & Kneedler, R. D. (1982). Reactive effects of self-assessment and self-recording on attention to task and academic productivity. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Maag, J. W., Reid, R., & DiGangi, S. A. (1993). Differential effects of self-monitoring attention, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 329–344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maggin, D. M., Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research: Self-management interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Marshall, K. J., Lloyd, J. W., & *Hallahan, D. P. (1993). Effects of training to increase self-monitoring accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mathes, M. Y., & Bender, W. N. (1997). The effects of self-monitoring on children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder who are receiving pharmacological interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McCarl, J. J., Svobodny, L., & Beare, P. L. (1991). Self-recording in a classroom for students with mild to moderate mental handicaps: Effects on productivity and on-task behavior. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, D. (1998). Research on self-management techniques used by student with disabilities in general education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McDougall, D., & Brady, M. P. (1995). Using audio-cued self-monitoring for students with severe behavior disorders. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, D., Heine, R. C., Wiley, L. A., Sheehey, M. D., Sakanashi, K. K., Cook, B. G., et al. (2017). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management techniques used by students with disabilities in inclusive settings. Behavioral Interventions, 32, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). Effects of self-recording for on-task and academic responding: A long term analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 6, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Moore, D. W., Anderson, A., Glassenbury, M., Lang, R., & Didden, R. (2013). Increasing on-task behavior in students in a regular classroom: Effectiveness of a self-management procedure using a tactile prompt. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Moore, D. W., Prebble, S., Robertson, J., Waetford, R., & Anderson, A. (2001). Self-recording with goal setting: A self-management programme for the classroom. Educational Psychology, 21, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1981). Theoretical explanations for reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification, 5, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *O’Reilly, M., Tiernan, R., Lancioni, G., Lacey, C., Hillery, J., & Gardiner, M. (2002). Use of self-monitoring and delayed feedback to increase on-task behavior in a post-institutionalized child within regular classroom settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. L., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percentage of non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Peterson, L. D., Young, K. R., Salzberg, C. L., West, R. P., & Hill, M. (2006). Using self-management procedures to improve classroom social skills in multiple general education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Prater, M. A., Joy, R., Chilman, B., Temple, J., & Miller, S. R. (1991). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior by adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rafferty, L. A., & Raimondi, S. L. (2009). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Examining the differential effects among students with emotional disturbance engaged in independent math practice. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. (1996). Research in self-monitoring with students with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 317–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Reynolds, B. M., Gast, D. L., & Luscre, D. (2014). Self-management of social initiations by kindergarten students with disabilities in the general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rhode, G., Morgan, D. P., & Young, K. R. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behaviorally handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluation procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 171–188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Roberts, R. N., & Nelson, R. O. (1981). The effects of self-monitoring on children’s classroom behavior. Child Behavior Therapy, 3, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rooney, K., Hallahan, D. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (1984). Self-recording of attention by learning disabled students in the regular classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 360–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Rooney, K., Polloway, E. A., & Hallahan, D. P. (1985). The use of self-monitoring procedures with low IQ learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 384–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. S., Durnan, S. L., Post, E. E., & Levinson, T. S. (2002). Self-monitoring procedures for children and adolescents. In M. A. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Smith, D. J., Young, K. R., West, R. P., Morgan, D. P., & Rhode, G. (1988). Reducing the disruptive behavior of junior high school students: A classroom self-management procedure. Behavioral Disorders, 13, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Snyder, M. C., & Bambara, L. M. (1997). Teaching secondary students with learning disabilities to self-manage classroom survival skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 534–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Sugai, G., & Rowe, P. (1984). The effect of self-recording on out-of-seat behavior of an EMR student. Education and Treatment of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Szwed, K., & Bouck, E. C. (2013). Clicking away: Repurposing student response systems to lessen off-task behavior. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vance, M. J., Gresham, F. M., & Dart, E. H. (2012). Relative effectiveness of DRO and self-monitoring in a general education classroom. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wills, H. P., & Mason, B. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 421–434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Wood, S. J., Murdock, J. Y., & Cronin, M. E. (2002). Self-monitoring and at-risk middle school students. Behavior Modification, 26, 605–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Wood, S. J., Murdock, J. Y., Cronin, M. E., Dawson, N. M., & Kirby, P. C. (1998). Effects of self-monitoring on on-task behaviors of at-risk middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeastern University, 404 International Village, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Amy M. Briesch & Margaret Beneville

  2. University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA

    Brian Daniels

Authors
  1. Amy M. Briesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Daniels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Margaret Beneville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy M. Briesch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Amy Briesch, Brian Daniels, and Margaret Beneville declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briesch, A.M., Daniels, B. & Beneville, M. Unpacking the Term “Self-Management”: Understanding Intervention Applications Within the School-Based Literature. J Behav Educ 28, 54–77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation