Skip to main content
Log in

A Preliminary Evaluation of Functional Communication Training Effectiveness and Language Preference When Spanish and English are Manipulated

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated whether differences in treatment effectiveness or preference between languages emerged across Spanish and English during functional communication training (FCT) for young children with developmental disabilities exposed to Spanish and English in the home environment. Participants were 2 young children with developmental disabilities who displayed destructive behavior maintained by social contingencies and whose families spoke Spanish and English at home. All procedures were conducted in the participants’ homes by their mothers with coaching from the investigator. The effectiveness of FCT was evaluated within a reversal design across baseline, FCT, and extinction conditions. A multielement design across language type (Spanish and English) was embedded within the reversal design during the extinction and FCT conditions to evaluate differences in treatment effectiveness across type of language. Finally, during all FCT sessions, a concurrent schedules design was used to evaluate participant preference for type of language. Results suggested that FCT was effective in reducing destructive behavior, increasing manding, and/or increasing task completion for these 2 participants across Spanish and English treatment conditions. Preference for the type of language did not emerge for either participant during FCT. Results are discussed in terms of the merits of systematically evaluating language variables when working with culturally and linguistically diverse families and children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Percentages of destructive behavior and independent manding refer to percentage of intervals of destructive behavior or independent manding.

References

  • Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, E., & Heiry, T. J. (1986). Comparison of Spanish only, Spanish and English, and English only cues with handicapped students. Reading Improvement, 23, 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Kuhn, D. E., & Thompson, R. H. (1998). Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 543–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. W., Wacker, D. P., & Boelter, E. W. (2009). An evaluation of the interaction between quality of attention and negative reinforcement with children displaying escape-maintained problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 343–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Lee, J. F., & Dolezal, D. (2009a). Conducting functional communication training in home settings: A case study and recommendations for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2(1), 21–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Lee, J. F., & Ibrahimovic, M. (2009b). Analysis of multiple manding topographies during functional communication training. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 21–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Toarmino, D. (1995). If behavioral principles are generally applicable, why is it necessary to understand cultural diversity? The Behavior Therapist, 18, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., & Day, M. H. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M., F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).

  • Iwata, B. A., Duncan, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Lerman, D. C., & Shore, B. A. (1994b). A sequential, test-control methodology for conducting functional analyses of self-injurious behavior. Behavior Modification, 18(3), 289–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M., Conroy, M., Gardner, R., & Oswald, D. (2008). Cultural sensitivity in the application of behavior principles to education. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, L. G., Dawson, G., & Renner, P. (2003). Autistic disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (pp. 409–454). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2005). To be or not to be bilingual: Autistic children from multilingual families. In J. Cohen, K. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISBA proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, T. G., Singer, G. H. S., & Carranza, F. (2006). A national survey of the educational planning and language instruction practices for students with moderate to severe disabilities who are English language learners. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 3, 242–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, T. G., Singer, G. H. S., & Grace, E. J. (2004). The individuals with disabilities education act and California’s proposition 227: Implications for English language learners with special needs. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S. M., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Cooper, L. J., Brown, K. A., Richman, D., et al. (1996). Choice-making treatment of young children’s severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 263–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, D. M., Wacker, D. P., & Winborn, L. (2001). Response efficiency during functional communication training: Effects of effort on response allocation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 73–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schieltz, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J. W., Berg, W. K., Lee, J. F., & Padilla Dalmau, Y. C. (2010). An evaluation of manding across functions prior to functional communication training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities., 22, 131–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. B., & Kominski, R. A. (2010). Language use in the United States: 2007. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-12 US. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Bantam Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., & Harding, J. W. (2004). Maintenance effects of functional communication training. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, R. H., Levine, K., Miller, E., Breslau, J., & Greenspan, S. (2000). Children with special needs in bilingual families: A developmental approach to language recommendations. In S. I. Greenspan & S. Wieder (Eds.), The interdisciplinary council on developmental and learning disorders clinical practice guidelines (pp. 141–151). Bethesda, MD: ICDL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winborn, L., Wacker, D. P., Richman, D. M., Asmus, J., & Geier, D. (2002). Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 295–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Wacker, D. P., & Kitsukawa, K. (2009). A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 185–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pendzick, M. L., & Stephenson, T. G. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Special Topic Report #4: Findings on Special Education LEP Students. Submitted to US Department of Education, OELA. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported by Grant R01 HD029402 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. The authors express their appreciation to the families who participated in this investigation and to Agnes DeRaad for her assistance with manuscript preparation. The first author completed an earlier version of this manuscript to fulfill University of Iowa Ed.S. requirements for a Ph.D. degree in School Psychology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaniz C. Padilla Dalmau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padilla Dalmau, Y.C., Wacker, D.P., Harding, J.W. et al. A Preliminary Evaluation of Functional Communication Training Effectiveness and Language Preference When Spanish and English are Manipulated. J Behav Educ 20, 233–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9131-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9131-z

Keywords

Navigation