Abstract
Collagen composite scaffolds have been used for a number of studies in tissue engineering. The hydration of such highly porous and hydrophilic structures may influence mechanical behaviour and porosity due to swelling. The differences in physical properties following hydration would represent a significant limiting factor for the seeding, growth and differentiation of cells in vitro and the overall applicability of such hydrophilic materials in vivo. Scaffolds based on collagen matrix, poly(DL-lactide) nanofibers, calcium phosphate particles and sodium hyaluronate with 8 different material compositions were characterised in the dry and hydrated states using X-ray microcomputed tomography, compression tests, hydraulic permeability measurement, degradation tests and infrared spectrometry. Hydration, simulating the conditions of cell seeding and cultivation up to 48 h and 576 h, was found to exert a minor effect on the morphological parameters and permeability. Conversely, hydration had a major statistically significant effect on the mechanical behaviour of all the tested scaffolds. The elastic modulus and compressive strength of all the scaffolds decreased by ~95%. The quantitative results provided confirm the importance of analysing scaffolds in the hydrated rather than the dry state since the former more precisely simulates the real environment for which such materials are designed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jungreuthmayer C, Jaasma MJ, Al-Munajjed AA, Zanghellini J, Kelly DJ, O’Brien FJ. Deformation simulation of cells seeded on a collagen-GAG scaffold in a flow perfusion bioreactor using a sequential 3D CFD-elastostatics model. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:420–7.
Doillon CJ, Whyne CF, Brandwein S, Silver FH. Collagen-based wound dressings: control of the pore structure and morphology. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986;20:1219–28.
O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1077–86.
Zhu Y, Wu H, Sun S, Zhou T, Wu J, Wan Y. Designed composites for mimicking compressive mechanical properties of articular cartilage matrix. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;36:32–46.
Zhu Y, Wan Y, Zhang J, Yin D, Cheng W. Manufacture of layered collagen/chitosan-polycaprolactone scaffolds with biomimetic microarchitecture. Colloid Surf B. 2014;113:352–60.
Gorczyca G, Tylingo R, Szweda P, Augustin E, Sadowska M, Milewski S. Preparation and characterization of genipin cross-linked porous chitosan–collagen–gelatin scaffolds using chitosan–CO2 solution. Carbohyd Polym. 2014;102:901–11.
Elsayed Y, Lekakou C, Labeed F, Tomlins P. Fabrication and characterisation of biomimetic, electrospun gelatin fibre scaffolds for tunica media-equivalent, tissue engineered vascular grafts. Mat Sci Eng C. 2016;61:473–83.
Davidenko N, Campbell JJ, Thian ES, Watson CJ, Cameron RE. Collagen–hyaluronic acid scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3957–68.
Offeddu GS, Ashworth JC, Cameron RE, Oyen ML. Structural determinants of hydration, mechanics and fluid flow in freeze-dried collagen scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2016;41:193–203.
Varley MC, Neelakantan S, Clyne TW, Dean J, Brooks RA, Markaki AE. Cell structure, stiffness and permeability of freeze-dried collagen scaffolds in dry and hydrated states. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:166–75.
Beachley V, Wen X. Fabrication of nanofiber reinforced protein structures for tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C. 2009;29:2448–53.
Davidenko N, Schuster CF, Bax DV, Raynal N, Farndale RW, Best SM, Cameron RE. Control of cross-linking for tailoring collagen-based scaffolds stability and mechanics. Acta Biomater. 2015;25:131–42.
Xingang W, Qiyin L, Xinlei H, Lie M, Chuangang Y, Yurong Z, Huafeng S, Chunmao H, Changyou G. Fabrication and characterization of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide)knitted mesh-reinforced collagen–chitosan hybrid scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;8:204–15.
Kane RJ, Weiss-Bilka HE, Meagher MJ, Liu Y, Gargac JA, Niebur GL, Wagner DR, Roeder RK. Hydroxyapatite reinforced collagen scaffolds with improved architecture and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:16–25.
Yin D, Wu H, Liu C, Zhang J, Zhou T, Wu J, Wan Y. Fabrication of composition-graded collagen/chitosan–polylactide scaffolds with gradient architecture and properties. React Funct Polym. 2014;83:98–106.
Jose MV, Thomas V, Dean DR, Nyairo E. Fabrication and characterization of aligned nanofibrous PLGA/Collagen blends as bone tissue scaffolds. Polymer. 2009;50:3778–85.
Arahira T, Todo M. Variation of mechanical behaviour of β-TCP/collagen two phase composite scaffold with mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:464–74.
Elango J, Zhang J, Bao B, Palaniyandi K, Wang S, Wu W, Robinson JS. Rheological, biocompatibility and osteogenesis assessment of fish collagen scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;91:51–59.
Tylingo R, Gorczyca G, Mania S, Szweda P, Milewski S. Preparation and characterization of porous scaffolds from chitosan-collagen-gelatin composite. React Funct Polym. 2016;103:131–40.
Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Cliche S, Gariépy C, Germain L, Berthod F. Comparative study of bovine, porcine and avian collagens for the production of a tissue engineered dermis. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3757–65.
Arora A, Kothari A, Katti DS. Pore orientation mediated control of mechanical behavior of scaffolds and its application in cartilage-mimetic scaffold design. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;51:169–83.
Ghorbani F, Nojehdehian H, Zamanian A. Physicochemical and mechanical properties of freeze cast hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds with dexamethasone loaded PLGA microspheres for hard tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:208–20.
Jeevithan E, Jeya Shakila R, Varatharajakumar A, Jeyasekaran G, Sukumar D. Physico-functional and mechanical properties of chitosan and calcium salts incorporated fish gelatin scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;60:262–7.
Kim MS, Kim GH. Electrohydrodynamic direct printing of PCL/collagen fibrous scaffolds with a core/shell structure for tissue engineering applications. Chem Eng J. 2015;279:317–26.
Muthukumar T, Aravinthan A, Sharmila J, Kim NS, Kim J-H. Collagen/chitosan porous bone tissue engineering composite scaffold incorporated with Ginseng compound K. Carbohyd Polym. 2016;152:566–74.
Cao H, Chen M-M, Liu Y, Liu Y-Y, Huang Y-Q, Wang J-H, Chen J-D, Zhang Q-Q. Fish collagen-based scaffold containing PLGA microspheres forcontrolled growth factor delivery in skin tissue engineering. Colloid Surf B. 2015;136:1098–106.
Suchý T, Šupová M, Sauerová P, Verdánová M, Sucharda Z, Rýglová Š, Žaloudková M, Sedláček R, Hubálek Kalbáčová M. The effects of different cross-linking conditions on collagen-based nanocomposite scaffolds—an in vitro evaluation using mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater. 2015;10:065008.
Murugan R, Ramakrishna S, Panduranga Rao K. Nanoporous hydroxy-carbonate apatite scaffold made of natural bone. Mater Lett. 2006;60:2844–7.
ISO, ISO13314: 2011 Mechanical testing of metals—ductility testing—compression test for porous and cellular metals, 2011.
Yavari SA, Wauthle R, van der Stok J, Riemslag AC, Janssen M, Mulier M, Kruth JP, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. Fatigue behaviour of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33:4849–58.
Ahmadi SM, Campoli G, Yavari SA, Sajadi B, Wauthlé R, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor A. Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2014;34:106–15.
Bobe K, Willbold E, Morgenthal I, Andersen O, Studnitzky T, Nellesen J, Tillmann W, Vogt C, Vano K, Witte F. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of biodegradable, open-porous scaffolds made of sintered magnesium W4 short fibres. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8611–23.
Piola M, Soncini M, Cantini M, Sadr N, Ferrario G, Fiore GB. Design and functional testing of a multichamber perfusion platform for three-dimensional scaffolds. Sci World J. 2013;2013:123974.
Kozłowska J, Sionkowska A. Effects of different crosslinking methods on the properties of collagen–calcium phosphate composite materials. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;74:397–403.
Kemppainen JM, Hollister SJ. Differential effects of designed scaffold permeability on chondrogenesis by chondrocytes and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31:279–87.
O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Waller MA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol Health Care. 2007;15:3–17.
Wang Y, Tomlins PE, Coombes AG, Rides M. On the determination of Darcy permeability coefficients for a microporous tissue scaffold. Tissue Eng C. 2010;16:281–9.
Villa MM, Wang L, Huang J, Rowe DW, Wei M. Bone tissue engineering with a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold and culture expanded bone marrow stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2015;103:243–53.
Grimm WJ, Williams MJ. Measurements of permeability in human calcaneal trabecular bone. J Biomech. 1997;30:743–5.
Wen D, Androjna C, Vasanji A, Belovich J, Midura RJ. Lipids and collagen matrix restrict the hydraulic permeability within the porous compartment of adult cortical bone. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:558–69.
Gautieri A, Vesentini S, Redaelli A, Buehler MJ. Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Lett. 2011;11:757–66.
Fratzl P. Collagen: structure and mechanics. Springer: New York, 2008.
Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S. Applications of polymer nanofibers in biomedicine and biotechnology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005;125:147–58.
Rampichová M, Chvojka J, Buzgo M, Prosecká E, Mikeš P, Vysloužilová L, Tvrdík D, Kochová P, Gregor T, Lukáš D, Amler E. Elastic three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2013;46:23–37.
Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677–89.
Kasten P, Beyen I, Niemeyer P, Luginbühl R, Bohner M, Richter W. Porosity and pore size of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1904–15.
Walters NJ, Gentleman E. Evolving insights in cell–matrix interactions: elucidating how non-soluble properties of the extracellular niche direct stem cell fate. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:3–16.
Anselme K, Ploux L, Ponche A. Cell/material interfaces: influence of surface chemistry and surface topography on cell adhesion. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;24:831–52.
Dutta P, Hajra S, Chattoraj DK. Binding of water and solute to protein-mixture and protein-coated alumina. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1997;34:449–60.
Feng B, Chen J, Zhang X. Interaction of calcium and phosphate in apatite coating on titanium with serum albumin. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2499–507.
Akin FA, Zreiqat H, Jordan S, Wijesundara MBJ, Hanley L. Preparation and analysis of macroporous TiO2 films on Ti surfaces for bone–tissue implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;57:588–96.
Mygind T, Stiehler M, Baatrup A, Li H, Zou X, Flyvbjerg A, Kassem M, Bünger C. Mesenchymal stem cell ingrowth and differentiation on coralline hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1036–47.
Cooper DML, Matyas JR, Katzenberg MA, Hallgrimsson B. Comparison of microcomputed tomographic and microradiographic measurements of cortical bone porosity. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74:437–47.
Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Yeh OC. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;3:307–33.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant project awarded by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (15-25813A). This publication is the result of the implementation of the “Technological development of post-doc programmes” project, registration number CZ.1.05/41.00/16.0346, supported by the Research and Development for Innovations Operational Programme (RDIOP), co-financed by European regional development funds and the state budget of the Czech Republic. The project was also supported by the “Progres Q29/1LF, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic” and GAUK no. 400215. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided for our work by the long-term conceptual development research organisation under project no. RVO: 67985891. Special thanks go to Darren Ireland for the language revision of the English manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suchý, T., Šupová, M., Bartoš, M. et al. Dry versus hydrated collagen scaffolds: are dry states representative of hydrated states?. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 29, 20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-6024-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-6024-2