Skip to main content
Log in

Polymeric meshes for internal sutures with differentiated adhesion on the two sides

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to investigate the effects of different plasma treatments on ePTFE abdominal prostheses with the final goal of obtaining a new prosthesis, made of a single strand of ePTFE, with clearly differentiated adhesion properties on the two sides, which should be able to promote tissue ingrowth on one side and prevent post surgical visceral adhesions on the other.

Samples obtained from ePTFE Bard Dulex Meshes have been treated sequentially with three different gases (N2, O2 and NH3) in order to choose the optimal treatment conditions to improve ePTFE wettability. In particular, no modification was induced by N2 treatment, while the full treatment after the final ammonia gas resulted in the best suitable candidate.

As demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy, AFM analyses and contact angle measurements, ammonia plasma treatment increases ePTFE surface roughness and renders it more hydrophilic, thus promoting adhesion without any alteration of the material’s bulk properties.

The reported results also evidence the possibility to obtain the maximum wettability with a cheap treatment by optimizing plasma exposure time.

As a preliminary cell adhesion study, Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (mouse, embryo) have been seeded on the treated and untreated materials in order to assess whether there was any difference in terms of cell attachment and spreading. Cells seeded on the ammonia plasma treated material showed a better adhesion and spreading when compared to the untreated material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. SHULMAN, P. K. AMID and I. L. LICHTENSTEIN, Am. Surg. 58(4) (1992) 255.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. K. AMID, A. G. SHULMAN and I. L. LICHTENSTEIN, Chirurgie 118(9) (1992) 551.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. GILBERT and L. L. FELTON, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 177 (1993) 126.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. H. THILL and W. M. HOPKINS, Am. Surg. 60 (1994) 553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. D. BERLINER, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 176 (1993) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MORRIS-STIFF and HUGHES, J. Am. Coll. Surg. 186(3) (1998) 352.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. L. JAMES, L. A. POOLE-WARREN, K. SCHINDHELM et al., Biomaterials 12 (1991) 801.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. P. BLEICHRODT, R. K. J. SIMMERMACHER, B. VAN DER LEI and J. M. SCHAKENRAAD, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 176 (1993) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. K. AMID, A. G. SHULMAN and I. L. LICHTENSTEIN, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 (1994) 373.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. K. J. SIMMERMACHER, J. M. SCHAKENRAAD and R. P. BLEICHRODT, J. Am. Coll. Surg. 178 (1994) 613.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. MURPHY, J. B. FREEMAN and P. G. DIONNE. Can. J. Surg. 32 (1989) 244.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. TYRREL, H. SILBERMAN, P. CHANDRASOMA et al.,Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 168 (1989) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. W. LAW and H. ELLIS, Clin. Mater. 3 (1988) 95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. D. JENKINS, T. W. KLAMER, J. J. PARTEKA and R. E. CONDON, Surgery 94 (1983) 392.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. S. MATLOUB, P. JENSEN, B. K. GRUNERT et al., Ann. Plast. Surg. 29 (1992) 508.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. L. BROWN, J. D. RICHARDSON, M. A. MALANGONI et al.,Ann. Surg. 201 (1985) 705.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. P. WALKER, J. HENDERSON and R. E. CONDON, J. Surg. Res. 55 (1993) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. BELLÖN et al., Biomaterials 17 (1996) 2367.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. O. NAIM, D. PULLEY, K. SCANLAN et al., J. Laparoendosc Surg. 3 (1993) 187.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. M. BELLON, J. BUJAN, L. A. CONTRERAS, A. CARRERA-SAN MARTIN, A. HERNANDO and F. JURADO, Mycro. Mesh. Biomater. 17 (1996) 1265.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. MARCANDALLI, C. RICCARDI and M. ARDOINO, Quaderni Assotec di Ricerca e Innovazione Industriale 2 (2001).

  22. J. P. BADEY, E. URBACZEWSKI-ESPUCHE, Y. JUGNET, D. SAGE and B. CHABERT, Polymer 12 (1994) 2472.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. MORRA and C. CASSINELLI, Le Scienze 315 (1994) 24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sannino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sannino, A., Conversano, F., Esposito, A. et al. Polymeric meshes for internal sutures with differentiated adhesion on the two sides. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 16, 289–296 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-0626-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-0626-9

Keywords

Navigation