Abstract
We have performed extensive Monte-Carlo computer simulations of the 2-parameter Weibull statistical distribution using data groups with sizes from 5 up to 100 samples. The maximum-likelihood method was used to evaluate the resulting Weibull modulus and the scale parameter, which may be different to the input values. We confirmed some trends in the evaluation of the statistical parameters for small data groups, such as a significant biasing of the Weibull modulus. We revealed the log-normal statistical distribution of the Weibull parameters obtained from repeated Monte-Carlo simulations for several groups. We also considered the influence of the measurement uncertainty on the determination of the statistical parameters. For the experimental evidence we used bend-strength data for alumina test samples from serial production in this year. The experimental data were randomly divided into several subgroups to compare the corresponding biasing of the Weibull modulus with the Monte-Carlo results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mech 18:293
ReliaSoft’s Weibull (1992) ++, Life Data Analysis Reference. ReliaSoft Publishing
Curtis RV, Juszczyk AS (1998) J Mater Sci 33:1151. doi:10.1023/A:1004361222711
Orlovskaja N, Peterlik H, Marczewski M, Kromp K (1997) J Mater Sci 32:1903. doi:10.1023/A:1018521310570
Peterlik H, Orlovskaja N, Steinkellner W, Kromp K (2000) J Mater Sci 35:707. doi:10.1023/A:1004757317724
Li QS, Fang JQ, Liu DK, Tang J (2003) Cem Concr Res 33:1631
Wu D, Zhou J, Li Y (2006) J Mater Sci 41:5630. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0344-9
Wu D, Zhou J, Li Y (2006) J Eur Ceram Soc 26:1099
Peterlik H (1995) J Mater Sci 30:1972. doi:10.1007/BF00353020
Danzer R, Lube T, Supancic P (2001) Z Metallkunde 92:773
Bergman B (1984) J Mater Sci Lett 3:689
Khalili A, Kromp K (1991) J Mater Sci 26:6741. doi:10.1007/BF02402669
Gong J (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:827
Barbero E, Fernandez-Saez J, Navarro C (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:847
Davies IJ (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:997
Wu DF, Li YD, Zhang JP, Chang L, Wu DH, Fang ZP, Shi YH (2001) Chem Eng Sci 56:7035
Song L, Wu D, Li Y (2003) J Mater Sci Lett 22:1651
Griggs JA, Zhang Y (2003) J Mater Sci Lett 22:1771
Davies IJ (2004) J Mater Sci 39:1441. doi:10.1023/B:JMSC.0000013913.84004.cd
Tanaka T, Nakayama H, Sakaida A, Imamichi T (1995) Mater Sci Res Int 1:51
Faucher B, Tyson WR (1988) J Mater Sci Lett 7:1199
Langlois R (1991) J Mater Sci Lett 10:1049
Cacciari M, Mazzanti G, Montanari GC (1996) IEEE Trans On El Ins 3:18
ASTM C 1239—95 (1995) Standard practice for reporting uniaxial strength data and estimating Weibull distribution parameters for advanced ceramics. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Jacquelin J (1993) IEEE Trans On El Ins 28:65
Hirose H (1999) IEEE Trans On Dielec El Ins 6:66
Kantar YM, Senoglu B (2008) Comput Geosci 34:1900
Ambrožič M, Vidovič K (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9645. doi:10.1007/s10853-007-1967-1
ASTM C 1161—94 (1994) Standard test method for flexural strength of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Danzer R (2006) J Eur Ceram Soc 26(15):3034
Lu C, Danzer R, Fiescher FD (2002) Phys Rev E 65:067102
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Ministry of Education and Sport of Republic of Slovenia and the European Social Fund. We thank the company Hidria AET for providing the experimental data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambrožič, M., Gorjan, L. Reliability of a Weibull analysis using the maximum-likelihood method. J Mater Sci 46, 1862–1869 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5014-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5014-2