Skip to main content
Log in

Deep drawing behaviour of ultrafine grained copper: modelling and experiment

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrafine grained materials produced by severe plastic deformation methods possess attractive mechanical properties such as high strength compared with traditional coarse grained counterparts and reasonable ductility. Between existing severe plastic deformation methods the Equal Channel Angular Pressing is the most promising for future industrial applications and can produce a variety of ultrafine grained microstructures in materials depending on route, temperature and number of passes during processing. Driven by a rising trend of miniaturisation of parts these materials are promising candidates for microforming processes. Considering that bi-axial deformation of sheet (foil) is the major operation in microforming, the investigation of the influence of the number of ECAP passes on the bi-axial ductility in micro deep drawing test has been examined by experiments and FE simulation in this study. The experiments have showed that high force was required for drawing of the samples processed by ECAP compare to coarse grained materials. The limit drawing ratio of ultrafine grained samples was in the range of 1.9–2.0 with ECAP pass number changing from 1 to 16, while a higher value of 2.2 was obtained for coarse grained copper. However, the notable decrease in tensile ductility with increase in strength was not as pronounced for bi-axial ductility. The FE simulation using standard isotropic hardening model and von Mises yielding criterion confirmed these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geiger M, Kleiner M, Eckstein R et al (2001) Manuf Technol 50:445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geiger M, Meßner A, Engel U (1997) Prod Eng 41:55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Rev Adv Mater Sci 13(1):15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyazaki S, Shibata K, Fujita H (1979) Acta Mater 27:855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Michel JF, Picart P (2003) J Mater Process Technol 141:439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raulea LV, Goijaerts AM, Govaert LE et al (2001) J Mater Process Technol 115:44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kals TA, Eckstein R (2000) J Mater Process Technol 103:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lapovok R, McKenzie PWJ, Thomson PF et al (2007) J Mater Sci 42(5):1649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0967-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lapovok R, Timokhina I, McKenzie PWJ et al (2008) J Mater Process Technol 200(1–3):441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalla Torre F, Lapovok R, Sandlin J et al (2004) Acta Mater 52(16):4819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marciniak Z, Duncan JL, Hu SJ (2002) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conrad H, Narayan J (2000) Scr Mater 42:1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The project was supported by ARC Discovery grant DP0557255.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lapovok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, X., Lapovok, R., Gu, C. et al. Deep drawing behaviour of ultrafine grained copper: modelling and experiment. J Mater Sci 44, 3807–3812 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3515-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3515-7

Keywords

Navigation