Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of rivaroxaban on activated clotting time in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Chinese patients

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It has been observed that patients on rivaroxaban require more heparin and frequent activated clotting time (ACT) monitoring throughout the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, but the strategy of heparin injection varies in different studies. We sought to examine the determinants of heparin dosage in Chinese patients on rivaroxaban.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban before atrial fibrillation ablation and compared them to patients on no anticoagulant. The dosage of heparin required to achieve ACT > 300 s was evaluated. We then tested determinants of heparin dosage prospectively.

Results

There were 124 patients on rivaroxaban (R group) and 42 on no anticoagulant (NA group) in retrospective study. Heparin dosage required to achieve target ACT was 0.89 ± 0.01 mg/kg in R group and 0.60 ± 0.01 mg/kg in NA group, P < 0.05. The bolus heparin dosage required was 0.77 ± 0.01 mg/kg (96.1 ± 1.1 U/kg) when baseline ACT > 200 s. In the prospective study, 80/90(88.9%) of patients in R group and 79/90(87.8%) in NA group achieved an ACT > 300 s after initial bolus injection of heparin. The ACT 60 min after target ACT (ACT60) in R group was higher than that in NA group (287.5 ± 28.3 VS 238.9 ± 29.5, P < 0.05). Rivaroxaban was the only independent predictor of ACT60. There was no significant difference in ACT or heparin dosage in patients with different duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation on rivaroxaban, the effective duration of heparin is prolonged and the procedural heparin requirement is significantly greater. Heparin dosage can be predicted by baseline ACT, but not influenced by duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus aspirin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:590–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai Y, Deng H, Shantsila A, Lip GY. Rivaroxaban versus dabigatran or warfarin in real-world studies of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2017;48:970–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehra MR, Vaduganathan M, Fu M, Ferreira JP, Anker SD, Cleland JGF, Lam CSP, van Veldhuisen DJ, Byra WM, Spiro TE, Deng H, Zannad F and Greenberg B. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of rivaroxaban on stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and sinus rhythm: the COMMANDER HF trial. Eur Heart J. 2019.

  5. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20:e1–e160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu M, Gabriels J, Khan M, Shaban N, D'Amato S, Liu CF, et al. Left atrial thrombus and dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in patients on continuous direct oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lakkireddy D, Reddy YM, Di Biase L, Vallakati A, Mansour MC, Santangeli P, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:982–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Asbach S, Biermann J, Bode C, Faber TS. Early heparin administration reduces risk for left atrial thrombus formation during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Briceno DF, Villablanca PA, Lupercio F, Kargoli F, Jagannath A, Londono A, et al. Clinical impact of heparin kinetics during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maleki K, Mohammadi R, Hart D, Cotiga D, Farhat N, Steinberg JS. Intracardiac ultrasound detection of thrombus on transseptal sheath: incidence, treatment, and prevention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:561–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Armbruster HL, Lindsley JP, Moranville MP, Habibi M, Khurram IM, Spragg DD, et al. Safety of novel oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted warfarin for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49:278–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura T, Kashimura S, Nishiyama T, Katsumata Y, Inagawa K, Ikegami Y, et al. Asymptomatic cerebral infarction during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparing uninterrupted rivaroxaban and warfarin (ASCERTAIN). JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:1598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirao K, Aonuma K, Kumagai K, Inoue K, Kimura M, Miyauchi Y, et al. Effects and risks of heparin bridging and different modes of interruption/resumption of rivaroxaban on perioperative complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation- another analysis of the JACRE-R Registry. Circ J. 2018;82:346–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Enriquez AD, Churchill T, Gautam S, Chinitz JS, Barbhaiya CR, Kumar S, et al. Determinants of heparin dosing and complications in patients undergoing left atrial ablation on uninterrupted rivaroxaban. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fawzy AM, Yang WY, Lip GY. Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world clinical practice: translating the trials to everyday clinical management. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18:187–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sawhney V, Shaukat M, Volkova E, Jones N, Providencia R, Honarbakhsh S, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants: a safe approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:1001–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng X, Hu Q, Gao L, Liu J, Qin S, Zhang D. Sex-related differences in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019.

  18. Martin AC, Godier A, Narayanan K, Smadja DM, Marijon E. Management of intraprocedural anticoagulation in patients on non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2018;138:627–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Lv H, Li D, Chen C, Gu G, Sun Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brendel LC, Dobler F, Hessling G, Michel J, Braun SL, Steinsiek AL, et al. The anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49:237–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshimura A, Iriki Y, Ichiki H, Oketani N, Okui H, Maenosono R, et al. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of rivaroxaban and apixaban in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2017;69:228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn J, Gripp T, Flieder T, Dittrich M, Hendig D, Busse J, et al. UPLC-MRM mass spectrometry method for measurement of the coagulation inhibitors dabigatran and rivaroxaban in human plasma and its comparison with functional assays. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Duncan J, Carrier M, Le Gal G, Tafur AJ, Vanassche T, Verhamme P, Shivakumar S, Gross PL, Lee AYY, Yeo E, Solymoss S, Kassis J, Le Templier G, Kowalski S, Blostein M, Shah V, MacKay E, Wu C, Clark NP, Bates SM, Spencer FA, Arnaoutoglou E, Coppens M, Arnold DM, Caprini JA, Li N, Moffat KA, Syed S and Schulman S. Perioperative management of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving a direct oral anticoagulant. JAMA Intern Med. 2019.

  24. Tscholl V, Lsharaf AK, Lin T, Bellmann B, Nagel P, Lenz K, et al. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran use in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:1095–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huang Xinmiao or Cao Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Songqun, H., Chunling, W., Zhifu, G. et al. Effects of rivaroxaban on activated clotting time in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Chinese patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 59, 509–516 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00650-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00650-8

Keywords

Navigation