Abstract
Introduction
Atrial flutter is frequently treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation with excellent results. While RF ablation remains the gold standard for catheter based treatment of atrial flutter, cryoablation has potential advantages including painless ablation and cryoadherence to the myocardium. We performed a prospective randomised trial comparing cryoablation and RF ablation in the treatment of atrial flutter.
Methods and results
We randomised 32 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter to either radiofrequency ablation using an 8 mm tip Blazer II XP catheter (EP Technology, San Jose, USA) or cryoablation using a 9 French 8 mm tip Freezor Max catheter (CryoCath Technologies Inc, Kirkland, QU, Canada). Twenty eight patients were then followed up for a mean of 14.7 months. The procedure was successful in producing isthmus block in all but one patient in the cryoablation group. Cryoablation was associated with a significantly longer procedure (171 vs 99 min) and ablation duration (59 vs 12.7 min), however fluoroscopy exposure was similar (30 vs 29 min). Cryoablation was associated with reduced pain scores compared with RF (mean pain score 0.4 vs 3.5). There were two recurrences of atrial flutter during follow-up, both in the cryoablation group.
Conclusions
Cryoablation has improved patient tolerability compared to RF ablation, however is associated with longer procedure and ablation durations. Further trials are required to confirm whether cryoablation has similar acute and chronic efficacy to RF ablation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gilligan, D. M., Zakaib, J. S., Fuller, I., Shepard, R. K., Dan, D., Wood, M. A., et al. (2003). Long-term outcome of patients after successful radiofrequency ablation for typical atrial flutter. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 26, 53–58.
Cosio, F. G. (2002). Atrial flutter update. Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 356–364.
Friedman, P. L. (2005). Catheter cryoablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 20, 48–54.
Lustgarten, D. L., Keane, D., & Ruskin, J. (1999). Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 41, 481–498.
Anselme, F., Saoudi, N., Poty, H., Douillet, R., & Cribier A. (1999). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: Significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block. Circulation, 99, 534–540.
Natale, A., Newby, K. H., Pisano, E., Leonelli, F., Fanelli, R., Potenza, D., et al. (2000). Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35, 1898–1904.
Manusama, R., Timmermans, C., Limon, F., Philippens, S., Crijns, H. J., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2004). Catheter-based cryoablation permanently cures patients with common atrial flutter. Circulation, 109, 1636–1639.
Montenero, A. S., Bruno, N., Zumbo, F., Antonelli, A., Fiocca, L., Barbieri, L., et al. (2005). Cryothermal ablation treatment of atrial flutter-experience with a new 9 French 8 mm tip catheter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 12, 45–54.
Timmermans, C., Ayers, G. M., Crijns, H. J., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2003). Randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation for the treatment of atrial flutter with emphasis on pain perception. Circulation, 107, 1250–1252.
Holdgate, A., Asha, S., Craig, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emergency Medicine (Fremantle), 15, 441–446.
Lara-Munoz, C., De Leon, S. P., Feinstein, A. R., Puente, A., & Wells, C. K. (2004). Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli. Archives of Medical Research, 35, 43–48.
Montenero, A. S., Bruno, N., Antonelli, A., Mangiameli, D., Barbieri, L., Andrew, P., et al. (2005). Comparison between a 7 French 6 mm tip cryothermal catheter and a 9 French 8 mm tip cryothermal catheter for cryoablation treatment of common atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 13, 59–69.
Kuniss, M., Kurzidim, K., Greiss, H., Berkowitsch, A., Sperzel, J., Hamm, C., et al. (2006). Acute success and persistence of bidirectional conduction block in the cavotricuspid isthmus one month post cryocatheter ablation of common atrial flutter. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 29, 146–152.
Montenero, A. S., Bruno, N., Antonelli, A., Mangiameli, D., Barbieri, L., Andrew, P., et al. (2005). Long-term efficacy of cryo catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial flutter: Results from a repeat electrophysiologic study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45, 573–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, N.J., Barlow, M., Varghese, P. et al. Cryoablation versus Radiofrequency Ablation in the treatment of Atrial Flutter trial (CRAAFT). J Interv Card Electrophysiol 16, 1–5 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-006-9027-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-006-9027-3