Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Fault Localization Technique Based on Deconvolution and Calibration of Power Pad Transients Signals

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a new fault localization method that is based on the analysis of power supply transient signals. Impulse response functions derived from the power grid are used to de-construct the measured power port transient signals into a set of gate level transients generated by the logic gates as signals propagate along paths in the circuit. By comparing these gate transients with those obtained from a defect-free chip or simulation model, it is possible to identify anomalies produced by defects and to locate them to specific path segments in the layout. Impulse response functions are used to significantly reduce both the attenuation effects of the power grid on the gate-generated transients and the chip-to-chip impedance variations in the power grid and test environment. Non-linear calibration techniques are proposed to reduce the chip-to-chip variations in path delays introduced by process variations. The procedure is demonstrated using simulation experiments to locate the position of defects to one or a small group of gates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Power grid characterization is previously discussed in [17] and briefly discussed here for ease of reference.

  2. Current transients are analyzed in this paper, but the same model and procedure holds for voltage transient analysis.

  3. Only one RC model of the power grid needs to be extracted from the layout, e.g., using the nominal values of the process. Process variations are handled by a separate procedure.

  4. The scan chain is not shown in Fig. 3b. It connects the calibration circuits used in each approach together to implement a shift register.

  5. This process is repeated for other gates along the path.

  6. The normalization process accounts for current step variations that occur in the CCs of the CUT due to process variations.

  7. Fan-out was added to improve the accuracy of the modeling of an actual circuit path.

References

  1. Acharyya D, Plusquellic J (2004) Calibrating power supply signal measurements for process and probe card variations. Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing, pp 23–30

  2. Aitken RC (1992) A comparison of defect models for fault location with IDDQ measurements. ITC, pp 778–787

  3. Bhunia S, Roy K, Segura J (2002) A novel wavelet transform based transient current analysis for fault detection and localization. DAC, 2002, pp 361–366

  4. Chakravarty S, Liu M (1992) IDDQ measurement based diagnosis of bridging faults. JETTA 3:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Paul I, Rosales M, Alorda B, Segura J, Hawkins C, Soden J (2001) Defect oriented fault diagnosis for semiconductor memories using charge analysis, theory and experiments. VLSI Test Symposium pp 286–291

  6. Gattiker AE, Maly W (1997) Current signatures: application. ITC, pp 156–165

  7. Gong Y, Chakravarty S (1995) On adaptive diagnostic test generation, ICCAD, pp 181–184

  8. http://www.mosis.com/Technical/Testdata/tsmc-025-prm.html

  9. Isern E, Figueras J (1995) IDDQ test and diagnosis of CMOS circuits. Des Test Comput 12(4):60–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lavo DB, Larrabee T., Colburn JE (1999) Eliminating the Ouija(R) Board: Automatic Thresholds and Probabilistic IDDQ Diagnosis. ITC, pp 1065–1072

  11. Muhammad K, Roy K (2001) Fault detection and location using IDD waveform analysis. Des and Test Comput 18(1):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naik S, Maly W (1993) Computer-aided failure analysis of VLSI circuits using IDDQ testing. VLSI Test Symposium, pp 106–108

  13. Plusquellic J, Acharyya D, Tehranipoor M, Patel C (2006) Triangulating to a defect’s physical coordinates using multiple supply pad IDDQs: test chip results. International Symposium on Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov., pp 36–45

  14. Plusquellic J, Acharyya D, Singh A, Tehranipoor M, Patel C (2006) Quiescent-signal analysis: a multiple supply pad IDDQ method. Des Test Comput 23(4):278–293 April

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pomeranz I, Reddy SM (1992) On the generation of small dictionaries for fault location. ICCAD, pp 272–279

  16. Singh A, Patel C, Plusquellic J (2004) Fault simulation model for iDDT testing: an investigation. VLSI Test Symposium, pp 304–310

  17. Thibeault C, Boisvert L (1998) Diagnosis method based on delta IDDQ probabilistic signatures: Experimental Results, ITC, pp 1019–1026

  18. van Genderen A, van der Meijs N, Beeftink F, Elias P, Geigenmuller U, Smedes T (1996) SPACE, Layout to Circuit Extraction software module of the Nelsis IC Design System”, Delft University of Technology, (space@cas.et.tudelft.nl)

  19. Wiener N (1949) Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza M. Rad.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: M. Margala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rad, R.M., Plusquellic, J. A Novel Fault Localization Technique Based on Deconvolution and Calibration of Power Pad Transients Signals. J Electron Test 25, 169–185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-008-5092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-008-5092-0

Keywords

Navigation