Abstract
This article begins by arguing that there is no such thing as a typical or unbiased historical source. Every source genre and each source has limitations and strengths. For any given source these characteristics can change depending on the purpose the source is used for. In approaching any source the historian should ask how, given its nature, the source can appropriately be used. The criterion for evaluating sources should be usability rather than reliability.
The author then goes on to discuss the usability of three key sources associated with the biography of the putative founder of Hasidism, Israel Baal Shem Tov: The Holy Epistle, his sayings as quoted in the books of Yaakov Yosef of Polonnoye [Połonne], and the stories in Shivhei habesht. While pointing out some ways in which he understands these sources to have been used inappropriately, the author concludes that all three sources do indeed have historiographical uses. These depend on a critical understanding of their genres, of how and why these sources came to be written, and of the history of each text.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Besht:
-
Israel Baal Shem Tov
- BPY:
-
Ben Porat Yosef
- F-B:
-
Frankel-Bauminger
- HE:
-
The Holy Epistle
- Rms:
-
Rothschild manuscript
- SHB:
-
Shivhei habesht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosman, M. Hebrew Sources on the Baal Shem Tov: Usability vs. Reliability. Jew History 27, 153–169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-013-9184-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-013-9184-8