Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A Dissenting Opinion

  • Policy Debate
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper asks whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act achieves its goals of significantly expanding health insurance coverage, while reducing costs and increasing the quality of the care provided. An examination of the early results and current future projections suggests that while PPACA will increase the number of Americans with health insurance, it will fall significantly short of universal coverage. In addition, PPACA fails to control health care costs, and will likely result in higher costs for government, as well as many businesses, and individuals. The author concludes that PPACA is not the most effective vehicle for achieving US health care reform, and that a more market-oriented approach offers a better alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Tanner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanner, M. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A Dissenting Opinion. J Fam Econ Iss 34, 3–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-013-9350-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-013-9350-7

Keywords

Navigation