Abstract
Different forms of accountability are part of educational restructuring across Europe. This article will focus on the different national configurations of accountability from teachers’ point of view. A comparative perspective will enlarge on commonalities and differences between teachers’ experiences in Spain, Portugal, Ireland, England, Sweden, Finland, and Greece. The results obtained demonstrate, on the one hand, that educational policy regarding state-initiated standardization and accountability measures vary highly within the EU. On the other hand, it emerged that the oft-cited discussion between a beneficial professional versus a simplistic performance-oriented form of accountability misses the general disbelief of teachers towards all forms of accountability. Although their work has been increasingly rendered visible over the recent past, teachers pinpointed the mismatch between monitored needs and available resources to effectively transform their educational practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Profknow—professional knowledge in education and health: restructuring work and life between the state and citizens in Europe (Citizens-506493). See http://www.profknow.net for an overview of Consortium members and project results and publications.
References
Adams, J. E., & Kirst, M. W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 463–489). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersly, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bolívar, A., & Moreno, J. M. (2006). Between transaction and transformation. The role of school principals as education leaders in Spain. Journal of Educational Change, 7(1–2), 19–31.
Bovens, M. (2006). Analysing and assessing public accountability. A conceptual framework. European governance papers (EUROGOV) No. C-06-01. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-01.pdf.
Carnoy, M., Elmore, R., & Siskin, L. S. (Eds.). (2003). The new accountability. High schools and high-stakes testing. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Cary, L. (1999). Unexpected stories: Life history and the limits of representation. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3), 411–427.
Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture: The end of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Teaching and change wars: The professionalism hypothesis. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars (pp. 45–68). Bloomington: Solution Tree.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Ascher, C. (1991). Creating accountability in big city school systems. Urban diversity series No. 102. ERIC clearinghouse on urban education series. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED334339.
Day, C., Flores, M., & Viana, I. (2007). Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: Findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 249–265.
Dupont, M., & Sugrue, C. (2007). Irish primary teachers’ work and life under restructuring. Deliverable 4, Profknow project. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/D04TeacherLifeWorkRestructuring.pdf.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Eurydice. (2005). Key data on education in Europe 2005. Retrieved November 2006 from http://www.eurydice.org/ressources/eurydice/.
Goodin, R. E. (2003). Democratic accountability: The distinctiveness of the third sector. European Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 359–396.
Goodson, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (Eds.). (2009). Change wars. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
Kosonen, T., & Houtsonen, J. (2007). Restructuring professional lives of Finnish teachers. The case study report of Finland. Deliverable 4, Profknow project. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/D04TeacherLifeWorkRestructuring.pdf.
Ladd, H. F. (1996). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 289–303.
Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(1), 37–46.
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.
Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.
Norrie, C., & Goodson, I. (2007). English primary teachers’ work and life under restructuring. Deliverable 4, Profknow project. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/D04TeacherLifeWorkRestructuring.pdf.
OECD. (2004). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Country note: Spain. Retrieved March 2006 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/41/32185669.pdf.
OECD. (2007a). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2007b). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world executive summary. Paris: OECD.
Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.
Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20(2/3), 219–237.
Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism. New York: Teacher College Press.
Sohlberg, P., Czaplicka, M., Lindblad, S., Houtsonen, J., Müller, J., Morgan, M., et al. (2007). Professional Expertise under restructuring. Comparative studies of education and health care. The survey study. Deliverable 3 Profknow project. Retrieved March 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/WP3_Final_report.pdf.
Wärwick, G. (2007). Swedish primary teachers’ work and life under restructuring. Deliverable 4, Profknow project. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/D04TeacherLifeWorkRestructuring.pdf.
Wiseman, A. W., & Brown, D. S. (2003). Teacher curricular control and student performance: A cross-national study of curricular accountability. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 5(2), 131–147.
Wössmann, L., Lüdemann, E., Schütz, G., & West, M. (2007). School accountability, autonomy and choice, and the level of student achievement: International evidence from PISA 2003. Education working paper No 13. Paris: OECD.
Zambeta, E. (2002). Modernisation of educational governance in Greece: From state control to state steering. European Educational Research Journal, 1(4), 637–655.
Zambeta, E., Thoma, D., Dakopoulou, N., & Varsopoulos, V. (2007). Greek primary teachers’ work and life under restructuring. Deliverable 4, Profknow project. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.profknow.net/files/results/D04TeacherLifeWorkRestructuring.pdf.
Acknowledgments
This paper is based on a presentation given at 1st ISA Forum of Sociology, Barcelona September 5–8, 2008. The authors want to acknowledge the work of all Profknow Consortium Members on which this article is based (see http://www.profknow.net/fs-consortium.html). The paper also greatly profited from the comments provided by the anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, J., Hernández, F. On the geography of accountability: Comparative analysis of teachers’ experiences across seven European countries. J Educ Change 11, 307–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9126-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9126-x