Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual screening of the SAMPL4 blinded HIV integrase inhibitors dataset

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several combinations of docking software and scoring functions were evaluated for their ability to predict the binding of a dataset of potential HIV integrase inhibitors. We found that different docking software were appropriate for each one of the three binding sites considered (LEDGF, Y3 and fragment sites), and the most suitable two docking protocols, involving Glide SP and Gold ChemScore, were selected using a training set of compounds identified from the structural data available. These protocols could successfully predict respectively 20.0 and 23.6 % of the HIV integrase binders, all of them being present in the LEDGF site. When a different analysis of the results was carried out by removing all alternate isomers of binders from the set, our predictions were dramatically improved, with an overall ROC AUC of 0.73 and enrichment factor at 10 % of 2.89 for the prediction obtained using Gold ChemScore. This study highlighted the ability of the selected docking protocols to correctly position in most cases the ortho-alkoxy-carboxylate core functional group of the ligands in the corresponding binding site, but also their difficulties to correctly rank the docking poses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skillman AG (2012) SAMPL3: blinded prediction of host-guest binding affinities, hydration free energies, and trypsin inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26(5):473–474. doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9580-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Newman J, Dolezal O, Fazio V, Caradoc-Davies T, Peat TS (2012) The DINGO dataset: a comprehensive set of data for the SAMPL challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26(5):497–503. doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9521-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mobley DL, Liu S, Lim NM, Wymer KL, Perryman AL, Forli S, Deng N, Su J, Branson K, Olson AJ (2014) Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des

  4. Peat TS, Dolezal O, Newman J, Mobley D, Deadman JJ (2014) Interrogating HIV integrase for compounds that bind—a SAMPL challenge

  5. Mtifiot M, Marchand C, Pommier Y (2013) HIV integrase inhibitors: 20-year landmark and challenges. Adv Pharmacol 67:75–105. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-405880-4.00003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hazuda DJ (2012) HIV integrase as a target for antiretroviral therapy. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 7(5):383–389. doi:10.1097/COH.0b013e3283567309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quashie PK, Sloan RD, Wainberg MA (2012) Novel therapeutic strategies targeting HIV integrase. BMC Med 10:34. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Surpateanu G, Iorga BI (2012) Evaluation of docking performance in a blinded virtual screening of fragment-like trypsin inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26(5):595–601. doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9526-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res Suppl 28(1):235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H (2003) Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat Struct Biol 10(12):980. doi:10.1038/nsb1203-980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rhodes DI, Peat TS, Vandegraaff N, Jeevarajah D, Le G, Jones ED, Smith JA, Coates JAV, Winfield LJ, Thienthong N, Newman J, Lucent D, Ryan JH, Savage GP, Francis CL, Deadman JJ (2011) Structural basis for a new mechanism of inhibition of HIV-1 integrase identified by fragment screening and structure-based design. Antivir Chem Chemother 21(4):155–168. doi:10.3851/IMP1716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30(16):2785–2791. doi:10.1002/jcc.21256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD (2003) Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 52(4):609–623. doi:10.1002/prot.10465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our laboratory is a member of the Laboratory of Excellence in Research on Medication and Innovative Therapeutics (LERMIT) supported by a grant from the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-LABX-33). We would like to thank the SAMPL4 organizers, with a special mention to David L. Mobley, for providing the experimental data required for the evaluation of our predictions, as well as for the alternate analysis of the virtual screening results. The pertinent comments and suggestions of the manuscript reviewers are also kindly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdan I. Iorga.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

PDF (1208 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colas, C., Iorga, B.I. Virtual screening of the SAMPL4 blinded HIV integrase inhibitors dataset. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28, 455–462 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9707-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9707-5

Keywords

Navigation