Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The understanding and optimization of protein-ligand interactions are instrumental to medicinal chemists investigating potential drug candidates. Over the past couple of decades, many powerful standalone tools for computer-aided drug discovery have been developed in academia providing insight into protein-ligand interactions. As programs are developed by various research groups, a consistent user-friendly graphical working environment combining computational techniques such as docking, scoring, molecular dynamics simulations, and free energy calculations is needed. Utilizing PyMOL we have developed such a graphical user interface incorporating individual academic packages designed for protein preparation (AMBER package and Reduce), molecular mechanics applications (AMBER package), and docking and scoring (AutoDock Vina and SLIDE). In addition to amassing several computational tools under one interface, the computational platform also provides a user-friendly combination of different programs. For example, utilizing a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation performed with AMBER as input for ensemble docking with AutoDock Vina. The overarching goal of this work was to provide a computational platform that facilitates medicinal chemists, many who are not experts in computational methodologies, to utilize several common computational techniques germane to drug discovery. Furthermore, our software is open source and is aimed to initiate collaborative efforts among computational researchers to combine other open source computational methods under a single, easily understandable graphical user interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez JC (2004) High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:365–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Green DV (2003) Virtual screening of virtual libraries. Prog Med Chem 41:61–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ooms F (2000) Molecular modeling and computer aided drug design. Examples of their applications in medicinal chemistry. Curr Med Chem 7:141–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van de Waterbeemd H (2005) From in vivo to in vitro/in silico ADME: progress and challenges. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 1:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) Software news and update AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785–2791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Danielson ML, Lill MA (2010) New computational method for prediction of interacting protein loop regions. Proteins 78:1748–1759

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Cheatham TE, Debolt S, Ferguson D, Seibel G, Kollman P (1995) Amber, a package of computer-programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal-mode analysis molecular-dynamics and free-energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput Phys Commun 91:1–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2010) Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina. J Comput Aided Mol Des 24:417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soto CS, Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Forrest L, Honig B (2008) Loop modeling: sampling, filtering, and scoring. Proteins 70:834–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zavodszky MI, Sanschagrin PC, Korde RS, Kuhn LA (2002) Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:883–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Molfetta FA, de Freitas RF, da Silva AB, Montanari CA (2009) Docking and molecular dynamics simulation of quinone compounds with trypanocidal activity. J Mol Model 15:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graves AP, Shivakumar DM, Boyce SE, Jacobson MP, Case DA, Shoichet BK (2008) Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing. J Mol Biol 377:914–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Manetti F, Locatelli GA, Maga G, Schenone S, Modugno M, Forli S, Corelli F, Botta M (2006) A combination of docking/dynamics simulations and pharmacophoric modeling to discover new dual c-Src/Abl kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 49:3278–3286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Okimoto N, Futatsugi N, Fuji H, Suenaga A, Morimoto G, Yanai R, Ohno Y, Narumi T, Taiji M (2009) High-performance drug discovery: computational screening by combining docking and molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paulsen JL, Anderson AC (2009) Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization. J Chem Inf Model 49:2813–2819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Park IH, Li C (2010) Dynamic ligand-induced-fit simulation via enhanced conformational samplings and ensemble dockings: a survivin example. J. Phys. Chem. B 114:5144–5153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hritz J, de Ruiter A, Ostenbrink C (2008) Impact of plasticity and flexibility on docking results for cytochrome P450 2D6: a combined approach of molecular dynamics and ligand docking. J Med Chem 51:7469–7477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H, Markley JL (2007) The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D301–D303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (1999) Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 285:1735–1747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weichenberger CX, Sippl MJ (2006) NQ-Flipper: validation and correction of asparagine/glutamine amide rotamers in protein crystal structures. Bioinformatics 22:1397–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan J, Cheatham TE, Cieplak P, Kollman PA, Case DA (1998) Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA, RNA and phosphoramidate—DNA helices. J Am Chem Soc 120:9401–9409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Massova I, Kollman PA (1999) Computational alanine scanning to probe protein–protein interactions: a novel approach to evaluate binding free energies. J Am Chem Soc 121:8133–8143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Naim M, Bhat S, Rankin KN, Dennis S, Chowdhury SF, Siddiqi I, Drabik P, Sulea T, Bayly CI, Jakalian A, Purisima EO (2007) Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein–ligand binding affinities. 1. exploring the parameter space. J Chem Inf Model 47:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kongsted J, Ryde U (2009) An improved method to predict the entropy term with the MM/PBSA approach. J Comput Aided Mol Des 23:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA (2004) Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins 55:383–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lamm G, Szabo A (1986) Langevin modes of macromolecules. J Chem Phys 85:7334–7348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kottalam J, Case DA (1990) Langevin modes of macromolecules—applications to Crambin and Dna hexamers. Biopolymers 29:1409–1421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Case DA (1994) Normal-mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 4:285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) ZINC–a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:177–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Hirakawa M (2010) KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D355–D360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Heyer LJ, Kruglyak S, Yooseph S (1999) Exploring expression data: identification and analysis of coexpressed genes. Genome Res 9:1106–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Guha R, Howard MT, Hutchison GR, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa H, Steinbeck C, Wegner J, Willighagen EL (2006) The Blue Obelisk-interoperability in chemical informatics. J Chem Inf Model 46:991–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ulf Ryde for access to the programs changepdb and changecrd that facilitate the estimation of entropic contributions to the free energy of binding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Markus A. Lill & Matthew L. Danielson

Authors
  1. Markus A. Lill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew L. Danielson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus A. Lill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lill, M.A., Danielson, M.L. Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. J Comput Aided Mol Des 25, 13–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation