Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of age on DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and conventional semen parameters in spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effects of male ageing on DNA fragmentation and chromatin packaging in the spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic (OAT) patients.

Methods

Sixty-one OAT patients and 49 men with proven fertility (controls) were included in the present study. DNA fragmentation was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay, while chromatin packaging was assessed by chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining.

Results

In the patient group, semen volume, percentage of normally shaped spermatozoa and sperm motility decreased significantly (P < 0.05) with age, while sperm concentration and the percentage of TUNEL and CMA3 positive spermatozoa showed a statistically significant increase with age (P < 0.05). In the control group, conventional semen parameters as well as DNA fragmentation and chromatin packaging did not show a statistically significant change with age (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Increased age in OAT patients is associated with an increase in sperm concentration, DNA fragmentation and poor chromatin packaging, as well as a decline in semen volume, sperm morphology and motility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs EW, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:9601–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhnert B, Nieschlag E. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:327–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 2002;17:990–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh NP, Muller CH, Berger RE. Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1420–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aitken RJ, Krausz C. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction 2001;122:497–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, Luharia A, Cooper W, Cole TR, et al. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003;40:62–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zini A, Libman J. Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the era of assisted reproduction. CMAJ 2006;175:495–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aitken RJ, Gordon E, Harkiss D, Twigg JP, Milne P, Jennings Z, et al. Relative impact of oxidative stress on the functional competence and genomic integrity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1998;59:1037–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1039–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Host E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:559–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997;56:602–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford WC, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Hull MG, Golding J. Increasing paternal age is associated with delayed conception in a large population of fertile couples: evidence for declining fecundity in older men. The ALSPAC Study Team (Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood). Hum Reprod 2000;15:1703–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2279–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Irvine DS, Twigg JP, Gordon EL, Fulton N, Milne PA, Aitken RJ. DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl 2000;21:33–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2001;75:237–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health O. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK, Published on behalf of the World Health Organization by Cambridge University Press, 1999.

  17. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1118–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andolz P, Bielsa MA, Vila J. Evolution of semen quality in North-eastern Spain: a study in 22,759 infertile men over a 36 year period. Hum Reprod 1999;14:731–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bujan L, Mansat A, Pontonnier F, Mieusset R. Time series analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992. BMJ 1996;312:471–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH. Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1009–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Irvine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J. Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ 1996;312:467–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lopes S, Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Meriano J, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1998;69:528–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Auger J, Kunstmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Engl J Med 1995;332:281–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 1992;305:609–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C, Chan SY, Leung A, Ng RP, Ng M, Tang LC, et al. Cross-sectional study of semen parameters in a large group of normal Chinese men. Int J Androl 1985;8:257–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JB. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006;85:496–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmid TE, Eskenazi B, Baumgartner A, Marchetti F, Young S, Weldon R, et al. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod 2007;22:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zubkova EV, Wade M, Robaire B. Changes in spermatozoal chromatin packaging and susceptibility to oxidative challenge during aging. Fertil Steril 2005;84(Suppl 2):1191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barroso G, Morshedi M, Oehninger S. Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1338–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aitken RJ, Baker MA, Sawyer D. Oxidative stress in the male germ line and its role in the aetiology of male infertility and genetic disease. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Print CG, Loveland KL. Germ cell suicide: new insights into apoptosis during spermatogenesis. Bioessays 2000;22:423–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Azad A, Mullen JB. Sperm DNA integrity: correlation with sperm plasma membrane integrity in semen evaluated for male infertility. Arch Androl 2005;51:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shen H, Ong C. Detection of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with sperm function and male infertility. Free Radic Biol Med 2000;28:529–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hughes CM, Lewis SE, McKelvey-Martin VJ, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, St John JC. Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res 1999;251:350–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Updat 2003;9:331–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakkas D, Seli E, Bizzaro D, Tarozzi N, Manicardi GC. Abnormal spermatozoa in the ejaculate: abortive apoptosis and faulty nuclear remodelling during spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:428–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sakkas D, Urner F, Bizzaro D, Manicardi G, Bianchi PG, Shoukir Y, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: effect on fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 1998;13(Suppl 4):11–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Henkel R, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C, Mehnert C, Menkveld R, et al. Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2004;81:965–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z, Wang L, Cai J, Huang H. Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006;23:367–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Benchaib M, Braun V, Lornage J, Hadj S, Salle B, Lejeune H, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1023–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Greco E, Scarselli F, Iacobelli M, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Ferrero S, et al. Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2005;20:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Greco E, Iacobelli M, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Ferrero S, Tesarik J. Reduction of the incidence of sperm DNA fragmentation by oral antioxidant treatment. J Androl 2005;26:349–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mrs. Carol Spanos for the English text editing. The project is co-funded by the European Social Fund and National Resources—(EPEAEK II) PYTHAGORAS (grant “Pythagoras” 70/3/7361).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantina Plastira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plastira, K., Msaouel, P., Angelopoulou, R. et al. The effects of age on DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and conventional semen parameters in spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 24, 437–443 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9162-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9162-5

Keywords

Navigation