Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mulesing and Animal Ethics

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) called for a ban on mulesing in the Australian sheep industry in 2004. Mulesing is a surgical procedure that removes wool-bearing skin from the tail and breech area of sheep in order to prevent flystrike (cutaneous myiasis). Flystrike occurs when flies lay their eggs in soiled areas of wool on the sheep and can be fatal for the sheep host. PETA claimed that mulesing subjects sheep to unnecessary pain and suffering and took action against the Australian wool industry that resulted in a number of international clothing retailers choosing not to use Australian wool. Although the Australian sheep industry agreed to phase out mulesing in 2010, there is some uncertainty as to whether this deadline will be achieved. The changing social ethic towards animal welfare suggests that the way the Australian sheep industry manages the phase out of mulesing in 2010 is vital to its future survival and success. It is likely that if mulesing does not cease in 2010 there will be a negative market reaction to Australian wool and the risk of legislation to ban mulesing. To avoid losing control of its animal welfare strategy, the Australian sheep industry should ensure that mulesing is phased out in 2010 and endorse the animal welfare ethic underpinning this change. The industry should also educate farmers and other industry stakeholders in how the changing social ethic for animal welfare can create new market opportunities for wool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Australian Wool Innovation Limited is an independent public company, owned by Australian woolgrowers, responsible for research and development in the Australian wool industry.

  2. Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce Member Organisations—LiveCorp (not-for-profit industry body for livestock exporters), WoolProducers (peak national representative body for over 15,000 Australian wool producers), National Farmers Federation (Australian peak farm lobby group), The Australian Livestock Exporters’ Council (national policy body representing the livestock export industry), Meat and Livestock Australia (independent public company, owned by producers, providing services to the Australian red meat industry), Sheepmeat Council of Australia (industry body responsible for representing and promoting the national interest of Australian sheepmeat producers), Federation of Australian Wool Organisations (provides administrative support and advice to member wool bodies).

  3. Source: http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/3663#S.

  4. Under the TPA, a breach of the secondary boycott provisions only allowed the ACCC to pursue punitive penalties against those found to be in breach of the provisions.

  5. Approximately 850,000 (2.5%) of 34 million lambs marked in Australia in 2006/07 were recorded on the Better Choices website (www.betterchoices.com.au) as being treated with Tri-Solfen pain relief prior to surgical mulesing.

References

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2005a). Federal Court sets date for Australian wool industry legal case. AWI. http://www.wool.com/Media-Releases.htm?item=MR_2005APR_11.htm. Accessed August 28 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2005b). PETA’s position totally unclear. AWI. http://www.wool.com/Media-Releases.htm?item=MR_2005AUG_2.htm. Accessed August 28 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2007a). The Australian wool industry and alternatives to mulesing: the facts. AWI, Sydney, NSW. http://www.wool.com.au/mediaLibrary/attachments/Publications/Sheep_health/Mulesing_TheFacts.pdf. Accessed February 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2007b). Australian wool wins historic agreement with PETA on mulesing. AWI, Sydney, NSW. http://www.wool.com/Media-Releases.htm?item=MR_2007JUN_17.htm. Accessed February 2009.

  • The Hon. Peter Costello MP. (2007). Doorstop interview. Duxton Hotel, Perth, Australia.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2008a). AWI Strategic Plan: 2008/09-2010/11. AWI Ltd, Sydney, NSW. http://www.wool.com.au/mediaLibrary/attachments/Publications/Corporate/StrategicPlan-0809-1011.pdf. Accessed February 2009.

  • RSPCA Australia. (2008a). Can the RSPCA prosecute farmers for performing painful husbandry procedures without anaesthetic or pain relief? KBPublisher. http://kb.rspca.org.au/Can-the-RSPCA-prosecute-farmers-for-performing-painful-husbandry-procedures-without-anaesthetic-or-p_84.html. Accessed August 28 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2008b). Find out the facts about mulesing. AWI Ltd, Sydney, NSW. http://www.wool.com.au/Mulesing_Alternatives/Background_on_Mulesing/page__9063.aspx. Accessed June 26 2009.

  • RSPCA Australia. (2008b). What is mulesing and what are the alternatives? KBPublisher. http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-is-mulesing-and-what-are-the-alternatives_113.html. Accessed August 28 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2008c). Progress of Australian Wool Innovation R&D on mulesing alternatives. AWI Ltd, Sydney, NSW. www.wool.com.au/2010. Accessed February 2009.

  • Akin, C. (2004). The urgent need for a permanent ban on mulesing and live sheep exports in the Australian wool industry based on animal welfare concerns. PETA. http://www.savethesheep.com/report.asp. Accessed February 2009.

  • Animal Health Australia. (2009). Animal health in Australia 2008. Canberra, Australia: Australian Animal Health Council Ltd. ISBN 978 1 876714 85 7.

  • Australian Veterinary Association. (2008). Part 10—Sheep and goat health and welfare. Australian Veterinary Association. http://avacms.eseries.hengesystems.com.au/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Policies&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=2151. Accessed June 25 2009.

  • Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce. (2008). The Australian Wool Industry. AWSIT, New South Wales, Australia. http://www.detmjuke.no/Facts%20about%20Mulesing.pdf. Accessed February 2009.

  • Australian Wool Innovation. (2007). Strategic plan for Australian wool innovation 2007–2012. Sydney, NSW: AWI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Wool Innovation and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2007). Agreement between AWI and PETA. http://www.wool.com/mediaLibrary/attachments/Media_Events/MR_300607.pdf. Accessed February 26 2009.

  • Bell, K., & Sackett, D. (2005). The economic and research implications of managing Merino sheep without mulesing. In 2005 Agribusiness Sheep Updates. Department of Agriculture and Food WA, Perth, WA, p. 4. http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/objtwr/imported_assets/content/aap/sl/welf_02.pdf. Accessed February 2009.

  • Bennett, R. M. (1996). People’s willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 5, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, V. M., Meeusen, E. N. N. T., Young, A. R., Andrews, A. E., Nash, A. D., & Brandon, M. R. (1996). Vaccination of sheep against larvae of the sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina). Vaccine, 14, 1347–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. E. (1993). Progress towards a non-surgical alternative to the Mules operation for the control of blowfly strike. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding, 41(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. E., Fell, L. R., & Shutt, D. A. (1994). A comparison of stress in surgically and non-surgically mulesed sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal, 71, 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (1974). Trade practices act. Australia: Commonwealth Consolidated Acts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Wool industry: Mulesing. The Senate. Hansard, Canberra, Australia. http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/genpdf/chamber/hansards/2005-10-11/0044/hansard_frag.pdf;fileType%3Dapplication%2Fpdf. Accessed August 26 2009.

  • Cook, D. F., & Steiner, E. C. (1990). Susceptibility of mulesing wounds to oviposition and strike development by the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Australian Veterinary Journal, 67, 352–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corish, P. (2005). PETA backpeddles from unjustified attack on farmers. National Farmers Federation. http://archive.nff.org.au/pages/nr05/106.html. Accessed February 2009.

  • Counsell, D. (2001). A benefit-cost analysis of the mules operation to the Australian sheep flock. In Proceedings of FLICS Conference. Launceston, Australia (pp. 369–373).

  • Cuming, M. (2006). PETA may be down, but it’s not out. Farm Weekly. January 5 2006.

  • Cuming, M., & Gray, D. (2008). New threat to 2010 mulesing ban. The Age. November 20 2008.

  • Davidson, B. S., Chaplin, S. J., & Laird, C. (2006). Effect of fibre supplementation on dag formation and flystrike in sheep grazing spring pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46, 783–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, M. S. (1980). Animal suffering. The science of animal welfare. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry. (2007). Animal welfare roles and responsibilities Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.daff.gov.au/animal-plant-health/welfare/aaws/online/roles#community. Accessed June 22 2009.

  • Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry. (2008). The Australian Animal Welfare Strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymock, J. J., & Forgie, S. A. (1995). Large-scale trapping of sheep blowflies in the northern North Island of New Zealand using insecticide-free traps. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35(6), 699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, L. R., & Shutt, D. A. (1988). Salivary cortisol and behavioural indicators of stress in sheep. In Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, 186–189.

  • Fell, L. R., & Shutt, D. A. (1989). Behavioural and hormonal responses to acute surgical stress in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 22, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, A., Wall, R., & French, N. P. (1998). The effect of farm management strategies on the incidence of sheep strike in Britain: A simulation analysis. Veterinary Parasitology, 79(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, N., Wall, R., Cripps, P. J., & Morgan, K. L. (1994). Blowfly strike in England and Wales: The relationship between prevalence and farm management factors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 8, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J., Kole, A., Van De Kroon, S. M. A., & De Lauwere, S. (2005). Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J., & Salter, B. (2002). Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: The case of BSE. Science and Public Policy, 29, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garran, J. C., & White, L. (1985). Merinos, myths and Macarthurs: Australian graziers and their sheep, 1799–1900. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. G. (2002). Mulesing for flystrike control. Farm note 46/96. Western Australia Department of Agriculture. Perth, WA. http://agspsrv34.agric.wa.gov.au/agency/pubns/farmnote/1996/f04696.htm. Accessed February 2009.

  • Graham, N. P. H. (1959). The control of fly strike. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding, 6(2), 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeff, J., & Karlsson, J. (2005). Merino sheep can be bred for resistance to breech strike. In 2005 agribusiness sheep updates. Perth, WA: Department of Agriculture and Food WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeff, J., Karlsson, J., Slocombe, L., Jones, K., & Underwood, N. (2008). A practical method to select for breech strike resistance in non-pedigreed Merino flocks. In Proceedings of the 2008 Agribusiness Sheep Updates. Department of Agriculture and Food WA, Perth, WA.

  • Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104(3–5), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. A., & Steiner, E. C. (1993). Susceptibility of freshly-mulesed lambs to flystrike and the effectiveness of propetamphos as a wound dressing. Australian Veterinary Journal, 70, 190–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1992). Case study: Animal welfare. In R. J. Berry (Ed.), Environmental dilemmas: Ethics and decisions. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C. G. (1994). Ectoparasites of livestock in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 21, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C. G., & Bishop, D. (2006). Flystrike in New Zealand: an overview based on a 16-year study, following the introduction and dispersal of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina Widermann (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Veterinary Parasitology, 137, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. D., & Champion, S. C. (2001). Wool producer knowledge of flystrike control. In Proceedings of FLICS Conference. Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.

  • Hustvedt, G., & Bernard, J. C. (2008). Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: The influence of labelling for fibre origin and production methods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustvedt, G., Peterson, H. H., & Chen, Y. (2008). Labelling wool products for animal welfare and environmental impact. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, P. J. (2006). Genetic alternatives to mulesing and tail docking in sheep: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Blowfly Committee. (1940). The prevention and treatment of blowfly strike in sheep. Report No. 98. Melbourne: CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2001). The cutting edge (an account of mulesing in Tasmania). In Proceedings of FLICS Conference. Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 357–363. http://www.wool.com.au/awi/flics/PDFs/Chapter_8/Jones_Mulesing_in_Tas.pdf.

  • Karlsson, L. J. E., Evans, D. L., & Greeff, J. C. (2001). Future options to reduce reliance on surgical mulesing. In Proceedings of FLICS Conference. Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.

  • Leathwick, D. M., & Atkinson, D. S. (1995) Dagginess and flystrike in lambs grazed on Lotus corniculatus or ryegrass. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. New Zealand Society of Animal Production Publications, 196–198.

  • Lee, C., & Fisher, A. D. (2007). Welfare consequences of mulesing sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal, 85(3), 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAF. (1996). Code of recommendations and minimum standards for the welfare of sheep. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

  • Makin, M. (2005). AVA welcomes mulesing pain relief. Australian Veterinary Association. St Leonards, New South Wales. http://avacms.eseries.hengesystems.com.au/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTFILEID=821. Accessed August 2009.

  • Massey, C. (1990). The Australian Merino. Ringwood, Victoria: Viking O’Neil Penguin Books Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, I., & Pietsch, R. (2005). A declaration of commitments made by the Australian wool and sheep industry taskforce in relation to animal welfare and the phasing out of mulesing. Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce, www.woolisbest.com.

  • McMahon, P. R. (1954). Thoughts on the technology of wool production. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding, 1(1), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. C. (2000). Ethical issues associated with sheep fly strike research, prevention and control. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 13(3–4), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. C. (2005). Tests on a new bait for flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) causing cutaneous myiasis (flystrike) in sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(1), 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, I. (2008). Tarred and fleeced by PETA yarn. The Sydney Morning Herald, 24 May 2008.

  • Paton, M. (2005). Mulesing accreditation—Vital for wool’s future. In Proceedings of 2005 Agribusiness Sheep Updates. Department of Agriculture and Food WA, Perth, WA.

  • Paull, D. R., Colditz, I., Lee, C., Atkinson, S. J., & Fisher, A. (2008). Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and epidural anaesthesia in reducing pain and stress responses to a surgical husbandry procedure (mulesing) in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48, 1034–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2004). An examination of two major forms of cruelty in Australian wool production: mulesing and live exports. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Norfolk, VA. http://www.savethesheep.com/pdf/WoolReport12-04.pdf. Accessed February 2009.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2005a). The Animals: Death “Down Under.” http://www.savethesheep.com/animals.asp. Accessed February 29 2009.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2005b). Group urges retailers to boycott Australian wool until lamb mutilations, live sheep exports end. http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=6125. Accessed March 2009.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2007). PETA’s boycott of Australian wool gains ground. http://www.savethesheep.com/f-wool_boycott_update.asp. Accessed June 28 2009.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2008a). H&M, Perry Ellis, Adidas, and Others Boycott Mulesed Wool. http://www.savethesheep.com/f-hm_perryellis_adidas_boycott.asp. Accessed June 26 2009.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2008b). How much do you really know? The six myths of mulesing. http://www.savethesheep.com/f-MuelsingMyths.asp. Accessed September 5 2009.

  • Phillips, C. J. C. (2009). A review of mulesing and other methods to control flystrike (cutaneous myiasis) in sheep. Animal Welfare, 18, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. S., & Hopkins, P. S. (1976). Chemical mulesing of sheep. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding, 23(2), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primary Industries Standing Committee. (2006). Model code of practice for the welfare of animals: The Sheep. PISC Report 89, Canberra.

  • Project, The. Mackinnon. (2004). Report on the increased prevalence of breech strike and increased mortalities from flystrike if sheep were not mulesed. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. (2001). Blowflies and Lice Information Manual. QDPI&F.

  • Reiman, T. (2009). Something stinks down under. PETA. http://blog.peta.org/archives/2009/07/something_stink.php. Accessed September 5 2009.

  • Rollin, B. (1990). Animal welfare, animal rights and agriculture. Journal of Animal Science, 68(10), 3456–3461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (1995). Farm animal welfare: Social, bioethical and research issues. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (2004). Annual meeting keynote address: Animal agriculture and emerging social ethics for agriculture. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 955–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (2006). Animal rights and human morality (3rd ed.). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, D. R., O’Connell, D., Morris, C. A., & Hickey, S. M. (2007). A preliminary genetic analysis of breech and tail traits with the aim of improving the welfare of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58(2), 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiell, K. (2006). Animal Welfare Inventory Report to AAWS—Livestock Production Working Group. http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/152105/aaws_stocktake_livestock_prod.pdf. Accessed September 2009.

  • Shutt, D. A., Fell, L. R., Connell, R., Bell, A. K., Wallace, C. A., & Smith, A. I. (1987). Stress-induced changes in plasma concentrations of immunoreactive β-endorphin and cortisol in response to routine surgical procedures in lambs. Australian Journal of Biological Science, 40, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. N. (2003). Contributions by veterinarians in developing the Mules operation for control of breech flystrike in sheep. The Australian Veterinary History Record, 37, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, A., Bessey, A., & Barker, B. (2006). Attitudes towards animal welfare. Report 90248. Canberra, ACT: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1997). Dynamics in consumer behaviour with respect to agriculture and food products. In B. Wierenga, V. A. Tilberg, K. Grunert, J. B. E. M. Steenkamp, & M. Wedel (Eds.), Agricultural marketing and consumer behaviour in a changing world (pp. 207–215). Dordrect: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellam, R. L., & Bowles, V. M. (1997). Control of blowfly strike in sheep: Current strategies and future prospects. International Journal for Parasitology, 27(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townend, C. (1987). Sheep strike and mulesing. Parasitology Today, 3(1), 68–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trade Practices Amendment (Small Business Protection) Bill 2007 (Cth).

  • Tribe, D. E., & Peel, L. J. (1988). Innovation, science and the farmer. Australian Science and Technology Heritage Centre, University of Melbourne. http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/tia/contents.html. Accessed May 2004.

  • Turner, H. N. (1977). Some aspects of sheep breeding in the tropics. In Animal breeding: Selected articles from the World Animal Review. FAO, Rome.

  • Verbeke, W., van Oekel, M. J., Warnants, N., Viane, J., & Boucque, C. V. (1999). Consumer perception. Facts and possibilities to improve acceptability of health and sensory characteristics of pork. Meat Sciences, 53, 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ville, S. (1998). Business development in colonial Australia. Australian Economic History Review, 38(1), 16–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardhaugh, K. G., & Morton, R. (1990). The incidence of flystrike in sheep in relation to weather conditions, sheep husbandry, and the abundance of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 41, 1155–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. E., Murray, M. D., & Graham, N. P. H. (1979). The blowfly strike problem of sheep in New South Wales. Australian Veterinary Journal, 55, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Blache, D., & Sneddon, J. (Unpublished). What are the salient beliefs of woolgrowers in regards to mulesing? Unpublished working paper. University of Western Australia (available on request from authors).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Joanne Sneddon

  2. Department of Philosophy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    Bernard Rollin

Authors
  1. Joanne Sneddon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard Rollin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne Sneddon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sneddon, J., Rollin, B. Mulesing and Animal Ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics 23, 371–386 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9216-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9216-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation