Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Choosing a Food Future: Differentiating Among Alternative Food Options

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the diversity of food networks that fit within the alternative food system of the United States. While farmers’ markets, community supported agriculture schemes, and corporate organic food markets all fit within the alternative food system, they differ greatly in the conventions and beliefs that they represent. The alternative food system has divided into two movements: corporate, weak alternative food networks; and local, strong alternative food networks. The weak corporate version focuses on protecting the environment; however, it neglects issues concerning labor standards, animal welfare, rural communities, small-scale farmers, and human health. Local, strong alternative food networks not only assure environmental protection, but they also address the issues that weak alternatives neglect. Using three case studies from the Washington, D.C. metro area, the author explains that strong alternative food networks are better suited to create social and political change because they challenge the foundations of the conventional food system: standardized and generic products, price-based competition, consolidated power, and global scale. To affect true social and political change in the United States, the author recommends supporting strong alternative food networks by creating the requisite cultural and political space for them to succeed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, P. (2006). Capitalism 3.0: A guide to reclaiming the commons. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belasco, W. J. (2007). Appetite for change: How the counterculture took on the food industry 1966–1988. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D. (2003). Silent theft: The private plunder of our common wealth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, L. B. (2003). Considerably more than vegetables, a lot less than community: The dilemma of community supported agriculture. In J. Adams (Ed.), Fighting for the farm: Rural America transformed (pp. 192–206). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, L. B. (2006). Of bodies, place, and culture: Re-situating local food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, B. (1999). Reclaiming the commons: Community farms and forests in a New England town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, D. (2005). Should we go “Home to eat?” Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmers Market Coalition. (2007). Paradigm. Retrieved June 18, from http://www.farmersmarketcoalition.org/paradigm.html.

  • Goldschmidt, W. (1978). As you sow: Three studies in the social consequences of agribusiness. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., & DuPuis, E. M. (2002). Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production–consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. European Society for Rural Sociology, 42, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. H. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C., & Allen, P. (2008). Selective Patronage and Social Justice: Local food consumer campaigns in historical context. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(4), 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, D. (2007). Food fight: The citizen’s guide to a food and farm bill. Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. L. (2006). The farmer as conservationist? In D. Imhoff (Ed.), Farming and the fate of wild nature: Essays in conservation-based agriculture (pp. 48–59). Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, F. M. (2006). Democracy’s edge: Choosing to save our country by bringing democracy to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1966). A sand county Almanac. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (1998). Industrial agriculture and rural community degradation. In L. E. Swanson (Ed.), Agriculture and community change in the U.S. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, M. (2006). What to eat. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Hodge, H., Merrifield, T., & Gorelick, S. (2002). Bringing the food economy home: Local alternatives to global agribusiness. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organic Trade Association (OTA). (2006). The Organic Trade Association 2006 Manufacturer Survey. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from <http://www.ota.com/>http://www.ota.com.

  • Pollan, M. (2006a). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2006b). The way we live now. In D. Imhoff (Ed.), Farming and the fate of wild nature: Essays in conservation-based agriculture (pp. 179–186). Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potomac Vegetable Farms. (2007). What is “Ecoganic”? Retrieved June 28, from http://www.potomacvegetablefarms.com/ecoganic/.

  • Ramírez-Ferrero, E. (2005). Troubled fields. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salais, R., & Storper, M. (1992). The four worlds of contemporary industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The way we eat: Why our food choices matter. New York: Rodale Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., & Salais, R. (1997). Worlds of production: The action frameworks of the economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture. (2003). Agriculture Fact Book: 2001–2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. (2006). One thing to do about food. The Nation, September 11, 14–22.

  • Watts, D. C. H., Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Making reconnections in agro-food geography: Alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2007). Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin. Retrieved June 23, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthelme_Brillat-Savarin.

  • Young, W. (2004). Sold out: The true cost of supermarket shopping. London: Vision Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Hiu Newcomb, Betsy Pritchard and Jack Sneuce who met with me at a time of year when farmers have too much to do and not enough daylight to do it. I owe a large debt of gratitude to Kelly Feltault for her insight and comments. I would also like to thank the four anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Follett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Follett, J.R. Choosing a Food Future: Differentiating Among Alternative Food Options. J Agric Environ Ethics 22, 31–51 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9125-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9125-6

Keywords

Navigation