Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Indicators of Biodiversity and Conservational Wildlife Quality on Danish Organic Farms for Use in Farm Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Indicator Development and Testing

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organic farming is expected to contribute to conserving national biodiversity on farms, especially remnant, old, and undisturbed small biotopes, forests, and permanent grassland. This objective cannot rely on the legislation of organic farming solely, and to succeed, farmers need to understand the goals behind it. A set of indicators with the purpose of facilitating dialogues between expert and farmer on wildlife quality has been developed and tested on eight organic farms. “Weed cover in cereal fields,” was used as an indicator of floral and faunal biodiversity in the cultivated land, and “uncultivated biotope area” on the farm was used as a general measure of wildlife habitats. Functional grouping of herbaceous plants (discriminating between “high conservation value” plant species and “competitive”/“ruderal” species) and low mobility butterflies were used as indicators of conservation value, especially focusing on the few sites left with considerable remnant conservation value. The dialog processes revealed that the organic farmers’ ideas and goals of conservation of wildlife quality were not necessarily the same as for biologists; the farmers expressed very different opinions on the biological rooted idea, that wildlife quality is related to the absence of agricultural impact. However, farmers also stated that the information given by the indicators and especially the dialogue with the biologist had influenced their perception and awareness of wildlife. We conclude that, combined with a dialogue process, using these indicators when mapping wildlife quality could be an important key component of a farm wildlife management advisory tool at farm level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W. M. Adams I. D. Hodge N. A. D. Bourn (1994) ArticleTitleNature Conservation and the Management of the Wider Countryside in Eastern England Journal of Rural Studies 10 147–157 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0743-0167(94)90026-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agger P., J. Brandt, C. Byrnak, S. M. Jensen, and M. Ursin, “Udviklingen i agerlandets småbiotoper i Østdanmark (The development of small, uncultivated biotopes in Eastern Danish farmland),” Research report 48 (1986). Roskilde University Centre

  • Alrøe, H. F. and E. S. Kristensen, “Research, values and ethics in organic agriculture – examples from sustainability, precaution, nature quality and animal welfare,” in P. Robinson, (ed.), 2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (Copenhagen, 2000), pp. 61–65

  • Anonymous, “Directions towards sustainable agriculture,” Communication from the Commission, COM, 22 final (1999)

  • Anonymous, “Danske naturtyper i det europæiske NATURA 2000 netværk,” (Danish Nature types in the European NATURA 2000 network). Ministry for Environment and Energy, Danish Forest and Nature Agency, (Copenhagen, 2000a)

  • Anonymous, “Oversigt over Landsforsøgene,” (Report on local crop experiments), The Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. Table 35: (Effect and yield of pesticide treatments in barley, 1993–99), 2000b

  • Anonymous, “High nature value farmland – Characteristics, trends and policy challenges,” EEA report, No 1, (2004), p. 26

  • E. Aude K. Tybirk A. Michelsen R. Ejrnæs A. B. Hald S. Mark (2004) ArticleTitleConservation Value of the Herbaceous Vegetation in Hedgerows – Does Organic Farming Make a Difference? Biological Conservation 118 IssueID4 467–478 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bol, V. van and A. Peeters, “Nature conservation in the framework of an Ecological Farming System (EFS),” in J. Isart, and J. J. Llerena (eds.), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming, Bonn: Proc. 1st ENOF Workshop, (Barcelona, 1995), pp. 127–136

  • J. Bowers (1999) ArticleTitlePolicy Instruments for the Conservation of Remnant Vegetation on Private Land Biological Conservation 87 327–339 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00074-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J., “Land use, landscape structure and the dynamics of habitat networks in Danish agricultural landscapes,” in J. Baudry, F. Burel, and V. Hawrylenko (eds.), EUROMAB: Comparisons of landscape pattern dynamics in European rural areas. Vol. 1, 1991, Seminars, (Paris: UNESCO, 1992), pp. 213–229

  • J. Burgess J. Clark C. M. Harrison (2000) ArticleTitleKnowledges in Action: An Actor Network Analysis of a Wetland Agri-Environment Scheme Ecological Economics 35 119–132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00172-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. G. Busk (2002) ArticleTitleFarmers’ Landscape Decisions: Relationships between Farmers’ Values and Landscape Practices Sociologia Ruralis 42 IssueID3 233–250 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9523.00213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Callicot L. B. Crowder K. Mumford (1999) ArticleTitleCurrent Normative Concepts in Conservation Conservation Biology 13 22–35 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97333.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. A. Chiverton N. W. Sotherton (1991) ArticleTitleThe Effects on Beneficial Arthropods of the Exclusion of Herbicides from Cereal Crop Edges Journal of Applied Ecology 28 1027–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Christensen N. Holst (1998) ArticleTitleNovel Strategies in Weed Control Providing for Environment, Economy and Landscape Resources Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz Sonderheft 16 501–509

    Google Scholar 

  • H. D. Clausen H. B. Holbeck J. Reddersen (2001a) ArticleTitleButterflies on Organic Farmland: Association to Uncropped Small Biotopes and their Nectar Sources, (Papilionoidea and Hesperoidea, Lepidoptera) Entomologiske Meddelelser 66 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • H. D. Clausen H. B. Holbeck J. Reddersen (2001b) ArticleTitleFactors Influencing Abundance of Butterflies and Burnets in the Uncultivated Biotopes of Organic Farmland Biological Conservation 98 IssueID2 167–178 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00151-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Cox P. Lowe M. Winter (1990) The Voluntary Principle in Conservation Packard Publishing Limited Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejrnæs, R., Structure and processes in temperate grassland vegetation, Ph.D. thesis, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser (National Environmental Research Institute, 1998)

  • R. E. Feber L. G. Firbank P. J. Johnson D. W. Macdonald (1997) ArticleTitleThe Effects of Organic Farming on Pest and Non-pest Butterfly Abundance Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 64 133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

  • G. Goodlass N. Halberg G. Verschuur (2003) ArticleTitleInput–Output Accounting Systems in the European Community – An Appraisal of their Usefulness in Raising Awareness of Environmental Problems European Journal of Agronomy 20 17–24 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00068-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Grime (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes John Wiley Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Halberg (1999) ArticleTitleIndicators of Resource Use and Environmental Impact for Use in a Decision aid for Danish livestock farmers Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 76 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Halberg G. Verschuur G. Goodlass (2005) ArticleTitleFarm Level Environmental Indicators; Are they Useful? An Overview of Green Accounting Systems for European Farm Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Hald (1999) ArticleTitleWeed Vegetation (Wild Flora) of Organic versus Conventional Cereal Fields in Denmark Annals of Applied Biology 134 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hald, A. B., H. Pontoppidan, J. Reddersen, and H. Elbek-Pedersen, “Sprøjtefri randzoner i sædskiftemarker. Plante- og insektliv samt udbytter: Landsforsøg 1987–92,” (Unsprayed field margins in arable fields. Plants, arthropods and yields: National Survey 1987–92), Bekæmpelsesmiddelforskning fra Miljøstyrelsen (Pesticid research) 6, Miljøstyrelsen (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen, 1994)

  • J. G. Hodgson (1986) ArticleTitleCommonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield Flora, I. The identity, distribution and habitat characteristics of the common and rare species Biological Conservation 36 199–252 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(86)90052-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. G. Hodgson (1993) ArticleTitleCommonness and Rarity in British Butterflies Journal of Applied Ecology 30 407–427

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Holbeck H. Clausen J. Reddersen (2000) ArticleTitleDagsommerfugle og køllesværmeres valg af nektarplanter i et økologisk jordbrugs småbiotoper, (Selection of nectar sources by butterflies and burnets in organic field boundary habitats) Entomologiske Meddelelser 68 47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Humphries P. H. Williams R. I. Vane-Wright (1995) ArticleTitleMeasuring Biodiversity Value for Conservation Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26 93–111 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM, “Basic Standards” 1. The principle aims of organic production and processing, Online, cited on July 20th 2000. Available at the World Wide Web: http://www.ifoam.org/standard/aims.html

  • Isart, J. and J. J. Llerena, (eds.), “Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming,” Proceedings of the First ENOF Workshop, Bonn, Dec. 8–9, 1995. (Barcelona, 1995)

  • Just, F., E. Noe, and L. A. Rasmussen, “Korridorer i landskabet,” (Green corridors in the landscape), Syddansk Universitet, notat 36, 1996

  • S. Kvale (1983) ArticleTitleThe Qualitative Research Interview – A Phenomenological and a Hermeneutical Mode of Understanding Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14 171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • P. D. Lancashire H. Bleiholder T. Boom Particlevan den P. Langelüddeke R. Strauss E. Weber A. Witzenberger (1991) ArticleTitleA Uniform Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Crops and Weeds Ann. Appl. Biol. 119 561–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., Of Computer Myths and Modelling: The Social Construction of Diversity, Knowledge, Information and Communication Technologies in Dutch Horticulture and Agricultural Extension, Ph.D. thesis. (Department of Rural Sociology, Wageningen, 1993)

  • Mayrhofer, P. and P. Schawerda, Die Bauern, die Natur & das Geld. Modell Ökopunkte Landwirtschaft. Verein zur Förderung der Landentwicklung und intakter Lebensräume, Baden Österreich, 1991

  • M. McGeoch (1998) ArticleTitleThe Selection, Testing and Application of Terrestrial Insects as Bioindicators Biological Review 73 181–201 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S000632319700515X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Moorcroft M. J. Whittingham R. B. Bradbury J. D. Wilson (2002) ArticleTitleThe Selection of Stubble Fields by Wintering Granivorous Birds Reflects Vegetation Cover and Food Abundance Journal of Applied Ecology 39 535–547 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00730.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig, W., “Sown weed strips – an excellent type of ecological compensation area in our agricultural landscape,” in J. Isart and J. J. Llerena (eds.), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming. Proc. 1st ENOF Workshop, Bonn 1995. (Barcelona, 1995), pp. 1–10

  • Noe, E., Værdier, rationalitet og landbrugsproduktion, Belyst ved en mikrosociologisk undersøgelse blandt danske økologiske og konventionelle kvægbrugere. (Values, Rationality and Farming – Examined in a micro sociological study of organic and conventional dairy farmers), Ph.D. thesis, (Department of Economic and Natural Resources at The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 1999)

  • E. Noe N. Halberg (2002) Research Experience with Tools to Involve Farmers and Local Institutions in Developing more Environmentally Friendly Practices K. Hagedorn (Eds) Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK 143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • B. G. Norton (1994) On What We Should Save: The Role of Culture in Determining Conservation Targets P. I. Forey C. J. Humphries R. I. Vane-Wright (Eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation Clarendon Press Oxford 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, B., S. Mark, A. Baattrup-Pedersen, K. Dahl, R. Ejrnæs, J. Fredshavn, J. Hansen, E. Lawesson, B. Münier, P. F. Møller, M. Risager, F. Rune, J. Skriver, and M. Søndergaard, “Naturkvalitet, kriterier og metodeudvikling,” (Nature quality, criteria and methods development), Faglig Rapport nr. 285, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser (National Environmental Research Institute, 1999)

  • B. Ohlmer (1998) ArticleTitleModels of farmers’ decision, making: problem definition Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 28 17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • G. N. Ovenden A. R. H. Swash D. Smallshire (1998) ArticleTitleAgri-environment Schemes and their Contribution to the Conservation of Biodiversity in England Journal of Applied Ecology 35 955–960

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Pollard (1977) ArticleTitleA Method for Assessing Changes in the Abundance of Butterflies Biological Conservation 12 115–134 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Pollard D. O. Elias M. J. Skelton J. A. Thomas (1975) ArticleTitleA Method of Assessing the Abundance of Butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973 Entomologist’s Gazette 26 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • G. R. Potts (1986) The Partridge: Pesticides, Predation and Conservation Collins London

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Powell G. J. Dean A. Dewar (1985) ArticleTitleThe Influence of Weeds on Polyphagous Arthropod Predators in Winter Wheat Crop Protection 4 298–312 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0261-2194(85)90032-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Primdahl (1999) ArticleTitleAgricultural Landscapes as Places of Production and for Living in Owner’s versus Producer’s Decision Making and the Implications or Planning Landscape and Urban Planning 46 IssueID1–3 143–150 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00038-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Purvis J. P. Curry (1984) ArticleTitleThe Influence of Weeds and Farmyard Manure on the Activity of Carabidae and Other Ground-Dwelling Arthropods in a Sugar Beet Crop Journal of Applied Ecology 21 271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K., N. Holst, and I. S. Kristensen, “Ukrudt på otte økologiske kvægbrug – betydende faktorer for ukrudtets udvikling 1989–96,” (Weeds on eight organic livestock farms – factors significant for the dynamics of weeds 1989–96); 15. Danske Planteværnskonference. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences. Report No 2 (1998), pp. 203–217

  • K. Rasmussen J. Rasmussen (2000) ArticleTitleBarley Seed Vigour and Mechanical Weed Control Weed Research 40 219–230 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00184.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddersen, J., S. Elmholt, and S. Holm, “Indirect effects of fungicides and herbicides on cereal field arthropods. Response to treatment-induced variations in leaf fungi and weeds in winter wheat 1994–1995,” Pesticides Research, 44. Miljøstyrelsen (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen 1998)

  • L. Sjöberg (2003) ArticleTitleIntuitive vs Analytical Decision Making: Which is Preferred? Scandinavian Journal of Management 19 17–29 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00041-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. W. Sotherton (1998) ArticleTitleLand Use Changes and the Decline of Farmland Wildlife: An Appraisal of the Set-aside Approach Biological Conservation 83 259–268 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00082-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Speight J. H. Lawton (1976) ArticleTitleThe Influence of Weed-cover on the Mortality Imposed on Artificial Prey by Predatory Ground Beetles in Cereal Fields Oecologia 23 211–223 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00361237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Stoltze (1996) Danske dagsommerfugle (Danish Butterflies) Gyldendal Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltze, M. and S. Pihl, “Rødliste, 1997 over planter og dyr i Danmark” (Read list of plants and animals in Denmark (English summary). (Miljø og Energiminisetriet, 1998)

  • Stopes, C., M. Measures, C. Smith, and L. Foster, “Hedgerow management in organic farming - impact on biodiversity,” in J. Isart and J. J. Llerena, (eds.), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming. Proc. 1st ENOF Workshop, Bonn 1995. (Barcelona, 1995), pp. 121–125

  • J. T. Sørensen P. Sandøe N. Halberg (2001) ArticleTitleAnimal Welfare as one Among Several Values to be considered at Farm Level: The Idea of an Ethical Account for Livestock Farming Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Animal Sci. Suppl. 30 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • T. E. Tew D. W. Macdonald M. R. W. Rands (1992) ArticleTitleHerbicide Application Affects Microhabitat use by Arable Wood Mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) Journal of Applied Ecology 29 532–539

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Tybirk H. F. Alrøe P. Frederiksen (2004) ArticleTitleNature Quality in Organic Farming: A Conceptual Analysis of Considerations and Criteria in a European Context Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 IssueID3 249–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033081.92534.d4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. I. Vane-Wright C. J. Humphries P. H. Williams (1991) ArticleTitleWhat to Protect? – Systematics and the Agony of Choice Biological Conservation 55 235–254 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken, P., F. Wijnands, and W. Stol, “Designing and Testing Prototypes,” Progress Report 2 of the Research Network on Integrated and Ecological Arable Farming Systems for EU and Associated Countries (Concerted Action AIR 3 – CT920755). (AB-DLO, Wageningen, 1995)

  • G. P. Vickerman (1978) ArticleTitleThe Arthropod Fauna of Undersown Grass and Cereal Fields Sci. Proc. Royal Dublin Soc. Ser. A 6 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Zenin M. Sattin (1998) ArticleTitleThreshold Level and Seed Production of Velvetleaf (Abutilon heophrasti Medicus) in Maize Weed Research 28 347–352

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agroecology, Research Centre Foulum, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark

    Egon Noe, Niels Halberg & Jens Reddersen

Authors
  1. Egon Noe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Niels Halberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Reddersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egon Noe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noe, E., Halberg, N. & Reddersen, J. Indicators of Biodiversity and Conservational Wildlife Quality on Danish Organic Farms for Use in Farm Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Indicator Development and Testing. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 383–414 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-7044-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-7044-3

Key words

Search

Navigation