Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children with autism often demonstrate disruptive behaviors during demanding teaching tasks. Language intervention can be particularly difficult as it involves social and communicative areas, which are challenging for this population. The purpose of this study was to compare two intervention conditions, a naturalistic approach, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) with an adult-directed ABA approach on disruptive behavior during language intervention in the public schools. A randomized clinical trial design was used with two groups of children, matched according to age, sex and mean length of utterance. The data showed that the children demonstrated significantly lower levels of disruptive behavior during the PRT condition. The results are discussed with respect to antecedent manipulations that may be helpful in reducing disruptive behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The assumption of equal variances here is well founded given the randomized nature of the study. However, a t test relaxing this assumption was also performed with no difference in the statistical significance of any of the findings.

  2. We have chosen to report only the results of the paired dependent t test because they are the most easily accessible finding, and because they are consistent with all the other findings. The results of the other analyses are available from the authors by request.

References

  • Bambara, L. M., & Warren, S. F. (1988). The individualized curriculum sequencing model: Effects on skill acquisition and generalization. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(1), 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarata, S. M., Nelson, K. E., & Camarata, M. N. (1994). Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 37(6), 1414–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., Newsom, C. D., & Binkoff, J. A. (1976). Stimulus control of self-destructive behavior in a psychotic child. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 139–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. J., & Allen, K. D. (2007). Using naturalistic procedures to enhance learning in individuals with autism: A focus on generalized teaching within the school setting. Psychology in the Schools, 44(7), 701–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and understanding of autistic children. Journal of Experiment child Psychology, 37, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., & Kern, L. (1984). Continuity of treatment: Toilet training in multiple community settings. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 9, 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M., Carnahan, C. R., Snyder, K. K., & Williamson, P. (2012). Supporting new teachers of students with significant disabilities through virtual coaching: A proposed model. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, A. P., Hancock, T. B., & Nietfeld, J. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11(4), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, A. P., Yoder, P. J., & Keetz, A. (1992). Evaluating milieu teaching. In Warren & Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention. Communication and language intervention series, Vol. 1, (pp. 9–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, xxiii, 405 pp.

  • Koegel, R. L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L. (1987a). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children’s social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R., Kim, S., Koegel, L., & Schwartzman, B. (2013). Improving socialization for high school students with ASD by using their preferred interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2121–2134.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1986). The effects of interspersed maintenance tasks on academic performance in a severe childhood stroke victim. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 425–430.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Surratt, A. V. (1992). Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22(2), 141–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987b). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Dunlap, G. (1988). Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(525), 538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Good, A., Cerniglia, L., Murphy, C., & Koegel, L. K. (1989). How to teach pivotal behaviors to children with autism: A training manual. Santa Barbara, California: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Singh, A. K., & Koegel, R. L. (2010). Improving motivation for academics in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1057–1066.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Williams, J. A. (1980). Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8(4), 537–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Wagner, A., Rogers, S., Szatmari, P., Aman, M., Charman, T., et al. (2005). Challenges in evaluating psychosocial interventions for autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., Benavidez, D. A., Compton, L., Paclawskyj, T., & Baglio, C. (1996). Behavioral treatment of autistic persons: A review of research from 1980 to the present. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17(6), 433–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzaheri, F. M., Koegel, L. K., Rezaee, M. & Rafiee, S. M. (2014). A randomized clinical trial comparison between pivotal response treatment (PRT) and structured applied behavior analysis (ABA) intervention for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2769–2777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153–158.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. E., Camarata, S. M., Welsh, J., Butkovsky, L., & Camarata, M. (1996). Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language-normal children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(4), 850–859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, R. M., Richman, D. M., Belmont, J. M., & Morse, P. (2005). Functional characteristics of disruptive behavior in developmentally disabled children with and without autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(4), 419–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1311–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, M. M., Shattuck, P., Abbeduto, L., & Greenberg, J. S. (2004). Trajectory of development in adolescents and adults with autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(4), 234–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 335–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J. R., & Rian, V. (1993). Support systems for students with severe problem behaviors in Indiana: A descriptive analysis of school structure and student demographics. Unpublished manuscript. Bloomington: Indiana University.

  • Vernon, T. W. (2011). Fostering a social child: Assessing the transactional benefits of parent-delivered embedded social interaction with young children with autism (Order No. AAI3422508). Available from PsycINFO (873849957; 2011 99100-152).

  • Volkmar, F. R., Lord, C., Bailey, A., Schultz, R. T., & Klin, A. (2004). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 135–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. A., Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. (1981). Response–reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 53–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research and preparation of the manuscript were funded in part by NIH Grant No. DC010924 and generous donations from the Kelly Family Foundation, the Eli and Edythe L. Broad Center for Asperger’s Research, and the Kind World Foundation. The authors would like to express our sincere appreciation to the families that participated in this research and Dr. John Yun for his assistance with the statistical analyses.

Ethical standard

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study. Human subjects IRB approval was obtained for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Kern Koegel.

Additional information

Lynn Kern Koegel is a partner in the private firm Koegel Autism Consultants, LLC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadzaheri, F., Koegel, L.K., Rezaei, M. et al. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 45, 2899–2907 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2451-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2451-4

Keywords

Navigation