Skip to main content
Log in

Judgments of Cause and Blame: Sensitivity to Intentionality in Asperger’s Syndrome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensitivity to intentionality in people with Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and matched controls was investigated using two scenario-based tasks. The first compared intentional and unintentional human actions and physical events leading to the same negative outcomes. The second compared intentional actions that varied in their subjective and objective likelihood of bringing about a negative outcome. Whilst adults with AS did not differ from controls in their judgments of causality, or in their blame judgments in relation to non-mentalistic factors, they showed heightened sensitivity to mentalistic considerations in their attributions of blame. They made greater differentiation than controls between intentional and unintentional actions, and also between actions that the protagonists believed to be likely versus unlikely to lead to negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. NB A 4-point scale was used for the causal intentionality task (but not for the causal foreseeability task) for comparability with the lesion study of Channon et al. (2010a, b), which used this simpler scale to study causal intentionality.

References

  • Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, J. S., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 803–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., et al. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60, 930–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, F., Frith, C. D., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839–1849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Channon, S., Fitzpatrick, S., Drury, H., Taylor, I., & Lagnado, D. (2010a). Punishment and sympathy judgments: Is the quality of mercy strained in Asperger’s syndrome? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1219–1226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Channon, S., Lagnado, D., Drury, H., Matheson, E., Fitzpatrick, S., Shieff, C., et al. (2010b). Causal reasoning and intentionality judgments after frontal brain lesions. Social Cognition, 28, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment. Cognition, 108, 353–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Försterling, F. (2001). Attribution: An introduction to theories, research, and applications. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. G., Boucher, J., Riggs, K. J., & Grayson, A. (2005). Moral understanding in children with autism. Autism, 9, 317–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., McClure, J., & Slugoski, B. (2005). Counterfactuals, conditionals and causality: A social psychological perspective. In D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 44–60). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P. (1997). Autism and Asperger syndrome: Preparing for adulthood. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The strange stories test: A replication with high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 191–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. (2004). Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis, 64, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagnado, D. A., & Channon, S. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108, 754–770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R., & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006). Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism? Social Neuroscience, 1, 270–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self-referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., Hilton, D. J., & Sutton, R. M. (2007). Judgments of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minio-Paluello, I., Baron-Cohen, S., Avenanti, A., Walsh, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2009). Absence of embodied empathy during pain observation in Asperger syndrome. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: Preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 59, 657–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., Moore, P. C., & Sim, D. L. H. (1999). Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing “human error”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naquin, C. E., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2004). Human reactions to technological failure: How accidents rooted in technology vs. human error influence judgments of organizational accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., South, M., & Provencal, S. (2007). Executive functions in autism: Theory and practice. In J. M. Perez, P. M. Gonzalez, M. L. Comi, & C. Nieto (Eds.), New developments in autism: The future is today (pp. 185–213). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, E. (2008). It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler test of adult reading. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8235–8240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the ESRC for supporting this research (grant reference RES-000-23-0959).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Channon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Channon, S., Lagnado, D., Fitzpatrick, S. et al. Judgments of Cause and Blame: Sensitivity to Intentionality in Asperger’s Syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 41, 1534–1542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1180-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1180-6

Keywords

Navigation