Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of flow experience and CAD tools in facilitating creative behaviours for architecture design students

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the role of flow experience in intellectual activity with an emphasis on the relationship between flow experience and creative behaviour in design using CAD. The study used confluence and psychometric approaches because of their unique abilities to depict a clear image of creative behaviour. A cross-sectional study questionnaire was used to collect data from 597 architecture design students. We found that both the characteristics of a design task and the interactivity of CAD positively predict the experience of flow. We also found that flow experiences partially mediate the relationship between the interactivity of CAD and creative behaviour in design. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Valentin, V. V., & Turken, A. (2002). The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention: Neurobiology and computational models. In S. Moore & M. Oaksford (Eds.), Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 245–288). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, K. S. (2008). An exploratory study of academic optimism and flow of elementary school teachers. Ohio: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45, 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botticchio, M., & Vialle, W. J. (2009). Creativity and flow theory: Reflections on the talent development of women. In J. Shi (Ed.), International Conference on the Cultivation and Education of Creativity and Innovation (pp. 97–107). Xi’an, China: Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

  • Carroll, E. A., Latulipe, C., Fung, R., & Terry, M. (2009). Creativity factor evaluation: Towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of ACM Creativity and Cognition (pp. 127–136). ACM.

  • Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2336–2356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (2000). Exploring web users’ optimal flow experiences. Information Technology & People, 13(4), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, M. A., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2010). Adaption-innovation theory and knowledge use in organizations. Management Decision, 48(8), 1159–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65(3), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990a). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990b). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 746–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. (1987). Alcohol and other drugs: Self responsibility. Bloomington, IL: Tichenor Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, S., & Caldwell, B. (2002). Describing functional requirements for knowledge sharing communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(5), 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, J. (1995). Flow in human computer interactions: Test of a model. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural research methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., Klein, B., Ro, Y., & Rossin, D. (2007). The impact of flow on learning outcomes in a graduate-level information management course. Journal of Global Business Issues, 1(2), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Chanyoung, S., & Lai, Y. (2012). Flow experience and continuance intention toward online learning: An integrated framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference in Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, Florida. 16–19 Dec.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldal, I., & Brnthe, L. (2012). Understanding group work in virtual environments: Performance, creativity, and presence. Human–Computer Interaction, 17, 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009). Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata, M., & Mallett, C. J. (2011). Flow experience in physical activity: Examination of the internal structure of flow from a process-related perspective. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 393–402. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9221-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An examination of the effects of flow on learning in a graduate-level introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAM. (2005). Policy and procedure for accreditation of architecture design programmes. http://www.lam.gov.my/accreditationlist.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.

  • Lee, S. S., Theng, Y. L., Goh, D., & Foo, S. (2004). Creative information seeking and interface design. In M. Masoodian, S. Jones, & B. Rogers (Eds.), 6th Asia Pacific Conference, APCHI 2004, Rotorua, New Zealand (pp. 604–609). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Liao, L. F. (2006). A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education. Distance Education, 27(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H. P., Lin, J. C. C., Hsiao, K. L., & Cheng, L. T. (2010). Information sharing behaviour on blogs in Taiwan: effects of interactivities and gender differences. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). Flow experience in sport: Construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(4), 343–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2008). Motivation and flow: Toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students. The Journal of psychology, 142(5), 533–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, J. S. (2010). Investigations of student and team creativity on an introductory engineering design project. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Tech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musta’amal, A. H., Norman, E., & Hodgson, T. (2009). Gathering empirical evidence concerning links between computer aided design (CAD) and creativity. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(2), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2006). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, L., Coussement, P., Moens, B., Amelinck, D., Lesaffre, M., & Leman, M. (2012). Interacting with the music paint machine: Relating the concepts of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 237–250.

  • Okeil, A. (2010). Hybrid design environments: Immersive and non-immersive architectural design. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., & Howard, S. (2004). Designing for flow in a complex activity. In M. Masoodian, S. Jones, B. Rogers, (Ed.), APCHI 2004. LNCS, (Vol. 3101, pp. 349–358). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Plsek, P. E. (1997). Creativity, innovation, and quality. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B., & Radcliffe, D. (2009). Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design, 41(3), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B. F., Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2007). Creativity and the use of CAD tools: Lessons for engineering design education from industry. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossin, D., Ro, Y. K., Klein, B. D., & Guo, Y. M. (2009). The effects of flow on learning outcomes in an online information management course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovere, D. A. (2011). Disegno: Creativity in virtual and animated environments. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siekpe, J. S. (2005). An examination of the multidimensionality of flow construct in a computer-mediated environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sielis, G. A., Mettouris, C., Papadopoulos, G. A., Tzanavari, A., Dols, R. M. G., & Siebers, Q. (2011). A context aware recommender system for creativity support tools. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(12), 1743–1763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skadberg, Y. X., & Kimmel, J. R. (2004). Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a Web site: Its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. (20.0 ed., Vol. 2011). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Northedge: Harper Collins.

  • Vass, M., Carroll, J. M., & Shaffer, C. A. (2002). Supporting creativity in problem solving environments. In Proceedings of the Fourth Creativity & Cognition Conference. (pp 31–37). Leicestershire: AMC Press.

  • Westley, F. R. (2006). Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Davison, R. M., & Mo, C. (2013). Employee creativity formation: The roles of knowledge seeking, knowledge contributing and flow experience in Web 2.0 virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1923–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Chen, F.-C. (2005). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: Implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design Studies, 26(2), 155–189. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharim, A., Omar, M. Z., Basri, H., Muhamad, N., & Isa, F. L. M. (2009). A gap study between employers’ perception and expectation of engineering graduates in Malaysia. Education, 6(11), 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, M., Anandarajan, M., & Dai, Q. (2010). Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1009–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, under the Malaysia International Scholarship (MIS). The authors thank the architecture design departments in the University of Malaysia, UM, UPM, UiTM, UTM, IIUM, and Tylors University for facilitating the process of data collection. Thanks go to Professor Merza Abbas for his insightful comments on an earlier version of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning, University of Palestine, Gaza, Palestine

    Husameddin M. Dawoud

  2. Centre for Instructional Technology and Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

    Hosam Al-Samarraie & Fahed Zaqout

Authors
  1. Husameddin M. Dawoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hosam Al-Samarraie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fahed Zaqout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Husameddin M. Dawoud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawoud, H.M., Al-Samarraie, H. & Zaqout, F. The role of flow experience and CAD tools in facilitating creative behaviours for architecture design students. Int J Technol Des Educ 25, 541–561 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9294-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9294-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation