Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Engineering and technology students’ perceptions of courses

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As cultural, social, political and economic changes take place, the secondary or high school curriculum should reflect and respond to changing needs and aspirations of students. Technology Education has been proactive in this arena as it has transformed over the decades to meet ever-changing societal needs. The most recent change to the discipline has been to add engineering and, as a result, adopting a new name and curriculum-Engineering and Technology Education. The added component and name change in Technology Education is causing discussions about what the new direction means, what professional preparation changes will be incurred, and what work graduating students will be prepared to do. In light of these changes, this study investigated perceptions of high school students in the United States of America about engineering and technology courses they take. To investigate whether students’ perceptions are in accord with current changes in Engineering and Technology Education, 316 students enrolled in engineering and technology courses in Georgia schools that have an affiliation with the Georgia Engineering and Technology Education Association (GETEA) were surveyed. According to data analyses, students’ perceptions can be divided into two factors. Educational Value of Course (factor 1) was extracted from statements measuring the degree to which the courses prepare students for employment and provide them with information regarding future employment. Personal Relevance of Course (factor 2) was derived from statements measuring students’ perceptions about links between engineering and technology education and their personal lives. Such findings suggest these students valued their engineering and technology courses, planned to continue their education, made good grades, and had varied types of career expectations for jobs such as design engineers and architects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • British Council. (2011). UK education systems. http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-education-uk-system-k-12-education.htm.

  • Benjamin, L. A. (1993). Parents’ literacy and their children’s success in school: Recent research, promising practices, and research implications. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlin, F. D. (1976). The relationship of parental education and maternal work and occupational status to occupational aspiration in adolescent females. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chief Scientist office, Australian Government, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. (2011). The Prime Ministers’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council. http://www.innovation.gov.au/Science/PMSEIC/Pages/default.aspx.

  • Clarke, V. A., & Teague, G. J. (1996). Characterizations of computing careers: Students and professionals disagree. Computers Education, 26(4), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domenico, D. M., & Jones, K. H. (2006). Career aspirations of women in the 20th century. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 22(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education in the Netherlands. (2011). http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_Netherlands#Elementary_School. Accessed January 2011.

  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education Technology, 18, 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Department of Education (GADOE). (2010). http://www.gadoe.org/ci_cta.aspx?PageReq=CICTATechnology; Downloaded 3 Sep 2010.

  • GeorgiaStandards.org. (2009). Georgia department of education Georgia performance standards. Extracted June 1, 2009 from https://www.georgiastandards.org/Pages/Default.aspx.

  • Gupta, U. G., & Houtz, L. E. (2000). High school students’ perceptions of information technology skills and careers. Journal of Industrial Technology, 16(4), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, M., & Burghardt, D. (2008). Addressing issues related to technology and engineering: An interview. The Technology Teacher, 68(3), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, III. W. J. (1999). Cross-gender interaction in technology education: A survey. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. B. (2006). New perspectives: Technology teacher education and engineering design. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 43(3), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology and Engineering Education Association (ITEEA). (2010). Accessed 14 Sep 2010.

  • Jepson, A., & Perl, T. (2002). Priming the pipeline. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. H., & Womble, M. N. (1998). At-risk students’ perceptions of work and career-related issues. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 20, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. H., Womble, M., & Searcy, C. A. (1997). T & I education students’ perceptions of courses. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(2), 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, D. W., Bryant, L. D., Palmer, L. K., & Araghi, F. A. (1989). A handbook of survey research. Survey Research Center: Institute for Behavioral Research. The University of Georgia, p. 53.

  • Lebeaume, J. (2004). Designing technology education at the junior high school level: Propositions from the French school curriculum. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, T. J., Convey, J. J., & Chwalek, A. R. (1985). Completing dissertation in the behavioral sciences and education: A systematic guide for graduate students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Magnuson, C. S., & Starr, M. F. (2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development, 27(2), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammes, I. (2004). Promoting girls’ interest in technology through technology education: A research study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mativo, J. M., & Kellam, N. (2008). Responsiveness of engineering curricula to cultural and societal changes. American Society for Engineering Education: Proceedings. http://www.soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=7810. Accessed 8 Oct 2010.

  • Mau, W. C., & Bikos, H. (2000). Educational and vocational aspirations of minority and female students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2009). K-12 education should include engineering, experts say. Science Daily. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2009/09/090908125129.htm.

  • Parastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51, 594–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, N. (1993). Student perceptions toward fashion marketing courses: Implications for specialized courses within secondary marketing education programs. Marketing Educators’ Journal, 19, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schavan, A. (2011). Federal Ministry of education and Research (BMBF). http://www.kooperation-international.de/en/deutschland/themes/info/detail/data/20888/. Accessed Jan 2011.

  • Shivy, V. A., & Sullivan, T. N. (2005). Engineering students’ perceptions of engineering specialties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signer, B., & Saldana, D. (2001). Educational and career aspirations of high school students and race, gender, class differences. Race, Gender, and Class, 8, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., Pan, W., & Newmeyer, M. D. (2008). Factors influencing high school students’ career aspirations. Professional School Counseling Journal, 11(5), 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T., & Allen, A. (2006). Gender differences in students’ perceptions of information technology as a career. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winborne, D. G., & Dardaine-Ragguet, P. (1993). Affective education for “at-risk” students: The view of urban principals. Urban Review, 25(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womble, M. N., Jones, K. H., & Ruff, N. S. (1995). Improving employment readiness of urban youth: Perceptions of students enrolled in business courses. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 37(1), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Workforce Education Program/Faculty of Engineering, University of Georgia, 213 River’s Crossing, 850 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    John M. Mativo

  2. Department of Workforce Education, Leadership and Social Foundation, College of Education, University of Georgia, 207 River’s Crossing, 850 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Myra N. Womble

  3. Department of Workforce Education, Leadership and Social Foundation, College of Education, University of Georgia, 212 River’s Crossing, 850 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Karen H. Jones

Authors
  1. John M. Mativo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myra N. Womble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen H. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Mativo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mativo, J.M., Womble, M.N. & Jones, K.H. Engineering and technology students’ perceptions of courses. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 103–115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9167-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9167-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation