Abstract
Research on teacher noticing in the field of mathematics education research has increased in the last decade; however, only a few studies have investigated the social and cultural impact on teachers’ noticing. This paper describes results of an international comparative study on (in-service) mathematics teachers’ professional noticing in China and Germany, representing Eastern and Western cultures. In this study, 203 teachers in China and 118 teachers in Germany participated in a video-based assessment of their professional noticing, i.e. perception, interpretation, and decision-making competencies. Item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) were employed for data analysis. Findings of the study revealed that German teachers performed significantly better than Chinese teachers on noticing aspects related to general pedagogy; in contrast, Chinese teachers outperformed their German counterparts on noticing aspects connected to mathematics instruction. Further DIF detection analysis found that German mathematics teachers demonstrated particular strengths in “perception” as a sub-facet of noticing; in contrast, Chinese teachers tended to demonstrate strength in “analyzing and decision making” as other sub-facets of noticing. These findings suggest that societal and cultural factors, such as different philosophical paradigms, traditions of teacher education, and teaching and mathematics curriculum traditions are main influencing factors on teachers’ professional noticing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. (1999). Culture in pedagogy, pedagogy across cultures. In R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot, & D. Philips (Eds.), Learning from comparing. New directions in comparative educational research (Vol. 1, pp. 149–180). Oxford, England: Symposium Books.
Ball, D. L. (2011). Foreword. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. xx–xxiv). New York, NY: Routledge.
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93.
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13.
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Theoretical framework, study design and main results of TEDS-M. In S. Blömeke, F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (pp. 19–48). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Understanding the development of teachers’ professional competencies as personally, situationally, and socially determined. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 783–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 459–473.
Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2006). US and Chinese teachers’ conceptions and constructions of representations: A case of teaching ratio concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 145–186.
Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 265–287.
Carter, K., Cushing, K., Sabers, D., Stein, P., & Berliner, D. C. (1988). Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual information. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 25–31.
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25.
Ding, L., & Domínguez, H. (2016). Opportunities to notice: Chinese prospective teachers noticing students’ ideas in a distance formula lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 325–347.
Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89–114.
Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Han, X., & Paine, L. (2010). Teaching mathematics as deliberate practice through public lessons. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 519–541.
Huang, R., Barlow, A. T., & Prince, K. (2016). The same tasks, different learning opportunities: An analysis of two exemplary lessons in China and the US from a perspective of variation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 141–158.
Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(2), 239–251.
Jacobs, V., Lamb, L., Philipp, R., & Schappelle, B. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
Jodoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 329–349.
Jones, V., & Jones, L. (2012). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating communities of support and solving problems. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2013). Learning from the Eastern and the Western debate: The case of mathematics teacher education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(1), 7–19.
Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., & Hoth, J. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161–182.
Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of vid-eo-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming short-comings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 369–387.
Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 172–181.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2015). Content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwanese and German mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 115–126.
König, J. (2013). First comes the theory, then the practice? On the acquisition of general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 999–1028.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, B., & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers. On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201.
Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69.
Mason, J. (2016). Perception, interpretation and decision making: Understanding gaps between competence and performance—A commentary. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 219–226.
Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158–170.
Mesic, V. (2012). Identifying country-specific cultures of physics education: A differential item functioning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16), 2483–2500.
Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it harder. In R. Goldman-Segal & R. Pea (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Noticing matters. A lot. Now what? In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 223–238). New York, NY: Routledge.
Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771.
Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York, NY: Routledge.
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361–370.
Thomas, J. N. (2017). The ascendance of noticing: Connections, challenges, and questions. In E. O. Schack, H. F. Molly, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 507–514). New York, NY: Springer.
van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 1–23.
van Es, E. A., Hand, V., & Mercado, J. (2017). Making visible the relationship between teachers’ noticing for equity and equitable teaching practice. In E. O. Schack, H. F. Molly, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Springer.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.
Wang, T. Y., & Tang, S. J. (2013). Profiles of opportunities to learn for TEDS-M future secondary mathematics teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 847–877.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J. et al. Professional Noticing of Mathematics Teachers: a Comparative Study Between Germany and China. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 943–963 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9907-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9907-x