Abstract
Simulation of gyrotrons using the particle-in-cell method predominantly requires 3D calculations. At large oversize factors of the interaction space, it leads to lengthy calculation times. We show that under certain conditions, the dimensionality of the problem can be reduced and 2.5D PIC simulations can be applied. Using the example of a 170 GHz gyrotron with TE28,12 operating mode, we study the influence of the external signal on the noise level in the output radiation under conditions of fluctuations of the accelerating voltage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Sabchevski, M. Glyavin, S. Mitsudo, Y. Tatematsu, T. Idehara, J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 42, 715 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-021-00804-8
S. Mizojiri, K. Shimamura, M. Fukunari, S. Minakawa, S. Yokota, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Tatematsu, T. Saito, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Comp. Lett. 28, 834 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2018.2860248
S.V. Kutsaev, B. Jacobson, A.Yu. Smirnov, T. Campese, V.A. Dolgashev, V. Goncharik, M. Harrison, A. Murokh, E. Nanni, J. Picard, M. Ruelas, and S.C. Schaub, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034052 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034052
M.A.K. Othman, J. Picard, S. Schaub, V.A. Dolgashev, S.M. Lewis, J. Neilson, A. Haase, S. Jawla, B. Spataro, R.J. Temkin, S. Tantawi, and E.A. Nanni, Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 117, 073502 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0011397
M.K.A. Thumm, G.G. Denisov, K. Sakamoto, M.Q. Tran, Nucl. Fusion 59, 073001 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab2005
A. G. Litvak, G. G. Denisov and M. Y. Glyavin, IEEE J. Microw. 1, 260 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/JMW.2020.3030917
M. Fukunari, K. Komurasaki, Y. Nakamura, Y. Oda, and K. Sakamoto, J. Energy and Power Eng. 11, 361 (2017), https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2017.06.001
K. Komurasaki, K. Kuniyoshi, Int. J. Aerospace Eng. 2018, 9247429 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9247429
Alberti S, Braunmueller F, Tran TM, Genoud J, Hogge J-Ph, Tran MQ, Ansermet J-Ph (2013) Phys Rev Lett 111, 205101 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.205101
E. V. Blokhina, S. P. Kuznetsov, and A. G. Rozhnev, “High-dimensional chaos in a gyrotron,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 188-193, Feb. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2006.888757..
A. E. Fedotov, R. M. Rozental, O. B. Isaeva and A. G. Rozhnev, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 42, 1073 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2021.3078761.
N. S. Ginzburg, R. M. Rozental, A. S. Sergeev, A. E. Fedotov, I. V. Zotova, and V. P. Tarakanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 034801 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.034801
R.M. Rozental, I. V. Zotova, N. S. Ginzburg, A. S. Sergeev, and V. P. Tarakanov, J. IR MM THz Waves 40, 150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0561-8.
N. Kumar and A. Bera, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 67, 3369 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.3000975.
I. Bandurkin, A. Fedotov, M. Glyavin, T. Idehara, A. Malkin, V. Manuilov, A. Sergeev, A. Tsvetkov, V. Zaslavsky, I. Zotova, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 67, 4432 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.3012524
MC. Blank, KA. Avramidis, S. Illy, C. Wu, Eighteenth International Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC) 1 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/IVEC.2017.8289628
C. An, D. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Li, J. Liu, Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC) 1079 (2018) https://doi.org/10.23919/APMC.2018.8617302
Lin M, Smithe DN (2019) International Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC) 1 https://doi.org/10.1109/IVEC.2019.8745190
Neudorfer J, Stock A, Schneider R, Roller S, Munz C (2013) IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 41, 87 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2012.2229298
N. S. Ginzburg, A. S. Sergeev, and I. V. Zotova, Phys. Plasmas 22, 033101 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913672.
K. A. Yakunina, A. P. Kuznetsov, and N. M. Ryskin, Phys. Plasmas 22, 113107 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935847.
V.L. Bakunin, G.G. Denisov, and Y.V. Novozhilova, J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 42, 117 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-020-00758-3
M. Yu. Glyavin, G. G. Denisov, M. L. Kulygin, M. M. Melnikova, Yu. V. Novozhilova, and N. M. Ryskin, Radiophys. Quantum El. 58, 673 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-016-9639-0.
I. V. Zotova, G. G. Denisov, N. S. Ginzburg, A. S. Sergeev, and R. M. Rozental, Phys. Plasmas 25, 013104 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5008666.
R. M. Rozental, I. V. Zotova, M. Yu. Glyavin, A. E. Fedotov, N. S. Ginzburg, A. S. Sergeev, and V. P. Tarakanov, Radiophys. Quantum El. 63, 363 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-021-10061-3.
M. M. Melnikova, A. V. Tyshkun, and N. M. Ryskin, J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 42, 446 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-021-00768-9
RM. Rozental1, NS.Ginzburg, MYu. Glyavin, AS. Sergeev, IV. Zotova, Phys. Plasmas 22 093118 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931746
A. B. Adilova, N. M. Ryskin, Radiophys. Quantum. El. 63, 703 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-021-10091-x.
M. Fukunari, G. S. Nusinovich, Y. Tatematsu, T. Saito and Y. Yamaguchi, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46, 2848 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2849379.
Fedotov AE, Rozental RM, Zotova1 IV, Ginzburg NS, Sergeev AS, Tarakanov VP, Glyavin MYu, Idehara T (2018) J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 39, 975 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0522-2
H. Wu, R. Liou and A. H. McCurdy, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 24, 606 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1109/27.532943.
J. J. Barroso, K. G. Kostov and R. A. Correa, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 27, 384 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1109/27.772265.
R. M. Rozental, N. I. Zaitsev, I. S. Kulagin, E. V. Ilyakov and N. S. Ginzburg, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 32, 418 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2004.829831.
A. A. Bogdashov, M. Yu. Glyavin, R. M. Rozental, A. P. Fokin, and V. P. Tarakanov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 44, 221 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785018030069.
M. Yu Glyavin , I. Ogawa, I. V. Zotova , N. S. Ginzburg, A. P. Fokin, A. S. Sergeev, R. M. Rozental, V. P. Tarakanov, A. A. Bogdashov, T. O. Krapivnitskaia, V. N. Manuilov, T. Idehara, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46, 2465 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2797480.
M.A. Moiseev, V.E. Zapevalov, and N.A. Zavolsky, Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 22, 813 (2001). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014954012067.
VE. Myasnikov, MV. Agapova, AN. Kuftin, VE. Zapevalov, GG. Denisov, VI. Ilin, LM. Belnova, AV. Chirkov, APh. Gnedenkov, AG. Litvak, VI. Malygin, VO. Nichiporenko, VN. Novikov, LG. Popov, IN. Roy, VG. Rukavishnikova, EV. Sokolov, EA. Soluyanova, EM. Tai, SV. Usachev, 38th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz), 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2013.6665557
SE. Tsimring, Electron Beams and Microwave Vacuum Electronics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2007).
I. V. Zotova, N. S. Ginzburg, G. G. Denisov, R. M. Rozental, and A. S. Sergeev, Radiophys. Quant. El. 58, 684 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-016-9640-7.
P. Woskov, H. Bindslev, F. Leipold, F. Meo, S. K. Nielsen, E. L. Tsakadze, S. B. Korsholm, J. Scholten, C. Tito, E. Westerhof, J. W. Oosterbeek, F. Leuterer, F. Monaco, M. Muenich, and D. Wagner, Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 10E524 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2347694.
S.-T. Han, R.G. Griffin, K.-N. Hu, C.-G. Joo, C. D. Joye, J. R. Sirigiri, R. J. Temkin, A. C. Torrezan, P. P. Woskov, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 35, 559 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2007.896931
L. Krier, KA. Avramidis, H. Braune, G. Gantenbein, S. Illy, Z. Ioannidis, J. Jelonnek, HP. Laqua, S. Marsen, D. Moseev, F. Noke, IGr. Pagonakis, T. Ruess,3, T. Rzesnicki, T. Stange, M. Thumm, RC. Wolf, 46th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz), 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz50926.2021.9566847
G.G. Denisov, EPJ Web Conf 149, 01001 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714901001.
D. Fasel, F. Albajar, T. Bonicelli, A. Perez, L. Rinaldi, U. Siravo, L. Sita, G. Taddia, Fusion Eng. Design 86, 872 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.017.
S. X. Ma, M. Zhang, L. L. Xia, D. H. Chen, Z. Zeng, X. L. Zhang, C. L. Wang, and K. X. Yu, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 656 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2014.2300506.
H. Braune, P. Brand, R. Krampitz, W. Leonhardt, D. Mellein, G. Michel, G. Mueller, J. Sachtleben, M. Winkler, and the W7-X ECRH teams at IPP IPF and FZK, J Phys Conf Ser 25, 008 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/25/1/008
B. Razavi, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 39, 1415 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2004.831608.
C. Liu, H. Huang, Z. Liu, F. Huo and K. Huang, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44, 1291 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2565564.
S.-T. Han, D. Kim, J. Kim and J.-R. Yang, IEEE Access 8, 145881 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013651.
V. A. Flyagin, A. V. Gaponov, I. Petelin and V. K. Yulpatov, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 25, 514 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1977.1129149.
A.V. Chirkov, G.G. Denisov, and A.N. Kuftin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 263501 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923269.
V. L. Bakunin, Yu. M. Guznov, G. G. Denisov, N. I. Zaitsev, S. A. Zapevalov, A. N. Kuftin, Yu. V. Novozhilova, A. P. Fokin, A. V. Chirkov, A. S. Shevchenko, Radiophys. Quantum El 62, 481 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-020-09994-y.
X. Zhou and A. S. Daryoush, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Lett. 3, 244 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1109/75.242227.
H. Ikeda and Y. Itoh, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech. 66, 3315 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2018.2836393.
Funding
This work was supported by the Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IAP RAS) Project through the Program “Development of engineering, technology and scientific research in the field of atomic energy until 2024” under Grant 0030–2021-0027.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
The physical model used in the KARAT code is based on the Maxwell equations complemented with boundary conditions for the fields at the edges of the simulation area and material equations binding the currents with field strength values. For simulations, the simulation area is split into separate cells of the orthogonal uniform mesh parallel to coordinate axes. Charge carriers are discrete with charge values equal to integer number of the elementary charge.
Electric and magnetic fields are split into two terms:\(\mathrm{E}=\widetilde{\mathbf{E}}+\overline{\mathbf{E} }\), \(\mathbf{B}=\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}+\overline{\mathbf{B} }\), where \(\widetilde{\mathbf{E}}\) and \(\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}\) are the time-dependent fields generated by the currents and the charges present in the system while \(\overline{\mathbf{E} }\) and \(\overline{\mathbf{B} }\) are the quasi-static external fields. Variable fields are described by Maxwell equations:
where c is the speed of light, \({{\varvec{v}}}_{s}\) is the velocity of the sth particle, \(\Delta V\) is the cell volume, and qs is the part of the charge in the cell.
In turn, the motion of each particle is described by Lorentz equations:
where \(\mathbf{p}=\mathrm{m}\mathbf{v}\gamma\) is the particles’ momentum, v is its velocity, γ is the relativistic mass factor, and m and q are the rest mass and the charge of the particle.
This system of equations allows for self-consistent simulation of the particles’ dynamics in the external and induced electromagnetic fields.
In order to undertake calculations almost in any frequency band, the variables are normalized within the software by the characteristic spatial scale R determined based on the dimensions of the simulated area and the assigned number of numerical mesh points:
The equations for variable fields and momenta take the form:
Hereafter, we drop the (*) sign in the dimensionless variables.
Maxwell equations are solved using the finite-difference scheme with step-over on the hexagonal meshes with half-step shift. In cylindrical coordinates \(\left(R\theta z\right)\), under the assumption of axial symmetry \(\partial /\partial \theta =0\), the simulated 2D area in r-z plane is covered by a hexagonal mesh with cells of hr and hz dimensions. For simulations of weakly relativistic gyrotrons operating at TE-type modes, with TM modes neglected, it is sufficient to use the differential equations in the difference form only for three field components, Eθ, Br, Bz:
Here, i and k are the numbers of mesh cells along r and z. To take into account the singularity at r = 0, we use the equality \({\left.{B}_{\theta }\right|}_{r=0}=0\) and obtain:
Relativistic equations of macroparticles’ motion are integrated according to the following scheme:
where \({\mathbf{p}}_{1,2}\) are the intermediate momentum values:
To eliminate the singularity, for the particles at the system’s axis, the next-step coordinates of the particle are evaluated in the rectangular Cartesian coordinate system in the following way:
Back in cylindrical coordinates, new values of the radius vector and the velocity components are evaluated as
where \(\sin\;\alpha=y^{n+1}/r^{n+1};\cos\alpha=x^{n+1}/r^{n+1}\). In the case when \({r}^{n+1}=0\), it is assumed that \(\cos\;\alpha=1\) and \(\sin\;\alpha=0\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozental, R.M., Tarakanov, V.P. Potential for Acceleration of Simulation of Dynamic Processes in Oversized Gyrotrons by Means of Using 2.5D Particle-in-Cell Method. J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 43, 479–492 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-022-00862-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-022-00862-6