Abstract
Health care financing arrangements not only have strong implications for income distribution, but also affect health care utilization. Therefore, a comparison of the equity in health care utilization for those health systems with different financing arrangements has important policy implications for health care policymakers. The concentration index (CI) and the horizontal inequity index (HI) are commonly used to measure inequality and inequity in health care utilization. In this paper, we propose simple methods to decompose the difference between two CIs and two HIs into two factors: one factor reflects the difference between the means, and the other factor reflects the difference between the distributions. The proposed decomposition method might be useful since the means are likely to be caused by factors that do not constitute unfair inequalities (inequities). We also present two empirical applications of the decomposition methods for the purpose of illustration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biewen M. (2002) Bootstrap inference for inequality, mobility and poverty measurement. Journal of Econometrics 108: 317–342
Chan B. (2002) From perceived surplus to perceived shortage: What happened to Canada’s physician workforce in the 1990s?. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa
CIHI: (2007) National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2006. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa
Cisse B., Luchini S., Moatti J. P. (2007) Progressivity and horizontal equity in health care finance and delivery: What about Africa?. Health Policy 80: 51–68
Clarke P. M., Gerdtham U.-G., Johannesson M., Bingefors K., Smith L. (2002) On the measurement of relative and absolute income-related health inequality. Social Science & Medicine 55(11): 1923–1928
Davidson R., Flachaire E. (2007) Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequality and poverty measures. Journal of Econometrics 141: 141–166
Deri C. (2005) Social networks and health service utilization. Journal of Health Economics 24: 1076–1107
Erreygers G. (2009a) Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics 28: 504–515
Erreygers G. (2009b) Correcting the concentration index: A reply to Wagstaff. Journal of Health Economics 28: 521–524
Gerdtham U. G., Jonsson B. (2000) International comparisons of health expenditure: Theory, data and econometric analysis. In: Culyer A. J., Newhouse J. P. (eds) Handbook of health economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 11–53
Grootendorst P. (1995) A comparison of alternative models of prescription drug utilization. Health Economics 4: 183–198
Hernandez-Quevedoa C., Jones A. M., Lopez-Nicola A., Rice N. (2006) Socioeconomic inequalities in health: A comparative longitudinal analysis using the European Community Household Panel. Social Science & Medicine 63(5): 1246–1261
Jones A.M. (2000) Health econometrics. In: Culyer A.J., Newhouse J.P. (eds) Handbook of health economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 265–344
Kakwani N. C. (1976) Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. Economic Journal 87: 71–80
Kakwani N. C. (1977) Applications of Lorenz curves in economic analysis. Econometrica 45(3): 719–728
Kakwani N. C., Wagstaff A., Doorslaer E. (1997) Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics 77(1): 87–103
Lerman R. I., Yitzhaki S. (1989) Improving the accuracy of estimates of Gini coefficients. Journal of Econometrics 42: 43–47
Lu J. R., Leung G. M., Kwon S., Tin K. Y. K., Van Doorslaer E., O’Donnelle O. (2007) Horizontal equity in health care utilization evidence from three high-income Asian economies. Social Science & Medicine 64(1): 199–212
Maasoumi E. (1997) Empirical analyses of inequality and welfare. In: Pesaran M., Schmidt P. (eds) Handbook of applied econometrics: Microeconomics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 202–245
Mills J., Zandvakili S. (1997) Statistical inference via bootstrapping for measures of inequality. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 133–150
Newhouse J. P. (2006) Reconsidering the moral hazard-risk avoidance tradeoff. Journal of Health Economics 25: 1005–1014
O’Donnell O., Van Doorslaer E., Wagstaff A., Lindelow M. (2008) Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. The World Bank, Washington
OECD: (1992) The reform of health care: A comparative analysis of seven OECD countries. OECD, Paris
Podder N. (1993) The disaggregation of the Gini coefficient by factor components and its applications to Australia. Review of Income and Wealth 39(1): 51–61
Tamblyn R., Laprise R., Hanley J.A. et al (2001) Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(4): 421–429
Van Doorslaer E., Koolman X. (2004a) Explaining the differences in income-related health inequalities across European countries. Health Economics 13: 609–628
Van Doorslaer E., Koolman X., Jones M. (2004b) Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilization in Europe. Health Economics 13: 629–647
Van Doorslaer, E., Masseria, C., & The OECD Health Equity Research Group Members. (2004c). Income-related inequality in the use of medical care in 21 OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers No. 14.
Van Doorslaer, E., Koolman, X., & Puffer, F. (2002). Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: has equal treatment for equal need been achieved. In Measuring up: Improving health systems performance in OECD countries (pp. 225–248). OECD: Paris.
Van Doorslaer E., Masseria C., Koolman, X., The OECD Health Equity Research Group: (2006) Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal 174(2): 177–183
Van Doorslaer E., Wagstaff A. (2000) Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the U.S. Journal of Health Economics 19: 553–583
Van Doorslaer E., Wagstaff A., Calonge S. et al (1992) Equity in the delivery of health care: Some international comparisons. Journal of Health Economics 11: 389–411
Wagstaff A. (2005) The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Economics 14(4): 429–432
Wagstaff A. (2009) Correcting the concentration index: A comment. Journal of Health Economics 28: 516–520
Wagstaff A., Paci P., Van Doorslaer E. (1991) On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine 33(5): 545–557
Wagstaff A., Van Doorslaer E. (2000a) Measuring and testing for inequity in the delivery of health care. Journal of Human Resource 35: 716–733
Wagstaff A., Van Doorslaer E. (2000b) Equity in health care financing and delivery. In: Culyer A., Newhouse J. (eds) Handbook of health economics. North Holland, Amsterdam
Wagstaff A., Van Doorslaer E. et al (1999) Redistributive effect, progressivity and differential tax treatment: Personal income taxes in twelve OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics 72: 73–98
Wagstaff A., Van Doorslaer E., Paci P. (1989) Equity in the finance and delivery of health care: Some tentative cross-country comparisons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 5(1): 89–112
Wagstaff A., van Doorslaer E., Watanabe N. (2003) On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. Journal of Econometrics 112(1): 207–223
World Health Organization: (2000) World health report 2000. WHO, Geneva
Zere E., McIntyre D. (2003) Equity in self-reported adult illness and use of health service in South Africa: Inter-temporal comparison. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 21(3): 205–215
Zhong H. (2007) Equity in pharmaceutical utilization in Ontario: A cross section and over time analysis. Canadian Public Policy 33(4): 487–507
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, H. On decomposing the inequality and inequity change in health care utilization: change in means, or change in the distributions?. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 10, 369–386 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-010-9085-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-010-9085-z