Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling techniques and inter-surveyor variability as sources of uncertainty in Polish macrophyte metric for lake ecological status assessment

  • PLANTS IN HYDROSYSTEMS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the Water Framework Directive, the results of the ecological status assessment should be accompanied with estimates of the level of confidence and precision of the determination. The Polish macrophyte-based method for lake assessment (Ecological State Macrophyte Index, ESMI) was tested for its uncertainty. The data from 12 lakes surveyed using four modifications of the sampling procedure, different numbers of transects and by two or three independent surveyors were analysed and the risk of misclassification was estimated. The choice of the sampling technique had no effect on abundance parameters (C max and %cover), but it affected significantly the taxonomic composition indices (H and J′). It did not influence, however, the final assessment result, since in all the methods used, the ESMI values were comparable and showed no significant differences of means. Although the mean ESMI values were statistically indifferent and gave the same assessment result irrespective of the number of transects surveyed, the lower the number of transects, the higher the SD value and the more uncertain the assessment result. The risk of misclassification of the 12 lakes varied from 0.5% to over 40% depending on the sampling standard deviation value and the proximity of the index observed value to the class boundary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akatov, V. V., T. V. Akatova, S. G. Chefranov & A. E. Shadzhe, 2009. Species saturation and invasibility of the plant communities: a hypothesis of species pools correlation. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 70(4): 328–340 (in Russian with English summary).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balsby, T. J. S., J. Carstensen & D. Krause-Jensen, 2013. Sources of uncertainty in estimation of eelgrass depth limits. Hydrobiologia 704: 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besse-Lototskaya, A., P. F. M. Verdonschot & J. A. Sinkeldam, 2006. Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia 566: 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birk, S., W. Bonne, A. Borja, S. Brucet, A. Courrat, S. Poikane, A. Solimini, W. van de Bund, N. Zampoukas & D. Hering, 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators 18: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet, J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Springer, Wien, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeg, A. & M. Wojterska, 2001. Plant communities in Wielkopolska: the state of knowledge and threats. In Wojterska, M. (ed.), Flora and Vegetation of Wielkopolska and South-Pomerania Lakeland. Guide Book of 52. Reunion of Polish Botanical Society, Poznan: 39–110 (in Polish).

  • Carvalho, L., S. Poikane, A. Lyche Solheim, G. Phillips, G. Borics, J. Catalan, C. De Hoyos, S. Drakare, B. J. Dudley, M. Järvinen, Ch. Laplace-Treyture, K. Maileht, C. McDonald, U. Mischke, J. Moe, G. Morabito, P. Nõges, T. Nõges, I. Ott, A. Pasztaleniec, B. Skjelbred & S. J. Thackeray, 2013. Strength and uncertainty of lake phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 127–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciecierska, H., A. Kolada, H. Soszka & M. Gołub, 2010. A method for macrophyte-based assessment of the ecological status of lakes, developed and implemented for the purpose of environmental protection in Poland. In Proceedings of the 4th BALWOIS Conference on Water Observation and Information System for Decision Support, Orchid, Republic of Macedonia. http://balwois.com/balwois/administration/full_paper/ffp-1502.pdf.

  • Clarke, R. T., 2013. Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software (WISERBUGS). Hydrobiologia 704: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T. & D. Hering, 2006. Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS. Hydrobiologia 566: 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T., M. T. Furse, R. J. M. Gunn, J. M. Winder & J. F. Wright, 2002. Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices. Freshwater Biology 47: 1735–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T., A. Lorenz, L. Sandin, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, J. Strackbein, N. T. Kneebone & P. Haase, 2006. Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics. Hydrobiologia 566: 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dromph, K. M., S. Agusti, A. Basset, J. Franco, P. Henriksen, J. Icely, S. Lehtinen, S. Moncheva, M. Revilla, L. Roselli & K. Sørensen, 2013. Sources of uncertainty in assessment of marine phytoplankton communities. Hydrobiologia 704: 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, C. M. & J. Kalff, 1986. Littoral slope as a predictor of the maximum biomass soft submerged macrophyte communities. Limnology and Oceanography 31: 1072–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, C. M. & J. Kalff, 1990. Patterns in the submerged macrophyte biomass of lakes and the importance of the scale of analysis in the interpretation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, B., M. Dunbar, E. Penning, A. Kolada, S. Hellsten, A. Oggioni, V. Bertrin, F. Ecke & M. Søndergaard, 2013. Measurements of uncertainty in macrophyte metrics used to assess European lake water quality. Hydrobiologia 704: 179–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EU, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 Oct. 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. OJEC L 327/1.

  • Géhu, J.-M., 1977. Le concept de sigmassociations et son application a l’etude du pysage vegetal des Falaises Atlantiques Françaises. Vegetatio 34: 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensén, S., 1977. An objective method for sampling the macrophyte vegetation in lakes. Vegetatio 33: 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., 2001. Indicator metrics and detection of impacts. In Karttunen, K. (ed.), Monitoring and Assessment of Ecological Status of Aquatic Environments, Vol. 563. Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord: 41–44.

  • Johnson, R. K., D. Hering, M. T. Furse & R. T. Clarke, 2006. Detection of ecological chance using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty. Hydrobiologia 566: 115–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen, A., V.-M. Vallinkoski, J. Leka, T. J. Marjomäki, S. Hellsten & K. Hämäläinen, 2013. A comparison of two methods for surveying aquatic macrophyte communities in boreal lakes: implications for bioassessment. Aquatic Botany 104: 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., H. Bennion, A. Burgess, J. Ellis, S. Juggins, R. Guthrie, J. Jamieson, V. Adriaenssens & M. Yallop, 2009. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia 633: 5–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolada, A., H. Ciecierska, J. Ruszczyńska, M. Mjelde, J. Dziedzic, P. Dynowski & A. Jasnorzewski, 2011. Macrophytes. In Soszka, H. (ed.), Ecological Status Assessment of the Waters in the Wel River Catchment. Guidelines for Integrated Assessment of Ecological Status of Rivers and Lakes to Support River Basin Management Plans. Institute of Inland Fisheries, Olsztyn: 169–186 (in Polish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolada, A., B. Dudley, N. Willby, P. Nõges, M. Søndergaard, S. Hellsten, M. Mjelde, E. Penning, G. van Geest, V. Bertrin, F. Ecke, H. Mäemets & K. Karus, 2012. Evaluating taxonomic composition macrophyte metrics for assessment of eutrophication in Europe – searching for the best responding common metric. In Schmidt-Kloiber, A., A. Hartmann, J. Strackbein, Ch. K. Feld & D. Hering (eds), Current Questions in Water Management: Book of Abstracts to the WISER Final Conference, Tallinn, Estonia, 25–26 January 2012: 92–94.

  • Leka, J. & A. Kanninen, 2003. Field surveys of aquatic macrophytes as a tool for monitoring and assessing the ecological status of the boreal lakes. In Ruoppa, M., P. Heinonen, A. Pilke, S. Rekolainen, H. Toivonen & H. Vuoristo (eds), How to Assess and Monitor Ecological Quality in Freshwaters, Vol. 547. Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord: 127–130.

  • Lyche Solheim, A., Ch. Feld, S. Birk, G. Phillips, L. Carvalho, G. Morabito, U. Mischke, N. Willby, M. Søndergaard, S. Hellsten, A. Kolada, J. Böhmer, O. Miler, M. Pusch, Ch. Argillier, E. Jeppesen, T. Lauridsen, S. Poikane & D. Hering, 2013. Comparison of common metrics for phytoplankton, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish for ecological status assessment of European lakes: a synthesis from the WISER project Module 3. Hydrobiologia 704: 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaró, O., T. Alcoverro, K. Dencheva, I. Díez, J. M. Gorostiaga, D. Krause-Jensen, T. J. S. Balsby, N. Marbà, I. Muxika, J. M. Neto, V. Nikolić, S. Orfanidis, A. Pedersen, M. Pérez & J. Romero, 2013. Exploring the robustness of macrophyte-based classification methods to assess the ecological status of coastal and transitional ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 704: 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matuszkiewicz, W., 2002. A Guide Book to Identification Plant Communities in Poland. PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).

  • Pielou, E. C., 1966. The Measurement of Diversity in Different Types of Biological Collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13: 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinel-Alloul, B., & A. Ghadouani, 2007. Spatial heterogeneity of planktonic microorganisms in aquatic systems: multiscale patterns and processes. In Franklin, R. & A. Mills (eds), The Spatial Distribution of Microbes in the Environment. Springer, New York: 203–307.

  • Rea, T. E., D. J. Karapatakis, K. K. Guy, J. E. Pinder III & H. E. Jr. Mackey, 1998. The relative effects of water depth, fetch and other physical factors on the development of macrophytes in a small southeastern US pond. Aquatic Botany 61: 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejewski, M., 1981. Lake vegetation of the Laska region in the Tuchola forests. Dissertations of Mikołaj Kopernik, University in Torun (in Polish with English summary).

  • Søndergaard, M., G. Phillips, S. Hellsten, A. Kolada, F. Ecke, H. Mäemets, M. Mjelde, M. M. Azzella & A. Oggioni, 2013. Maximum growing depth of submerged macrophytes in European lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soszka, H. (ed.), 2011. Ecological Status Assessment of the Waters in the Wel River Catchment. Guidelines for Integrated Assessment of Ecological Status of Rivers and Lakes to Support River Basin Management Plans. Institute of Inland Fisheries, Olsztyn (in Polish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. D., C. A. Staicer & B. Freedman, 1995. Aquatic vegetation of Nova Scotian lakes differing in acidity and trophic status. Aquatic Botany 51: 181–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staniszewski, R., K. Szoszkiewicz, J. Zbierska, J. Lesny, Sz. Jusik & R. T. Clarke, 2006. Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification. Hydrobiologia 566: 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szoszkiewicz, K., J. Zbierska & R. Staniszewski, 2009. The variability of macrophyte metrics used in river monitoring. Oceanological & Hydrobiological Studies 38(4): 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackeray, S. J., P. Nõges, M. J. Dunbar, B. J. Dudley, B. Skjelbred, G. Morabito, L. Carvalho, G. Phillips, U. Mischke, J. Catalan, C. De Hoyos, C. Laplace, M. Austoni, B. M. Padeddal, K. Maileht, A. Pasztaleniec, M. Järvinen & A. Lyche Solheim, 2013. Quantifying uncertainties in biologically-based water quality assessment: a pan-European analysis of phytoplankton community metrics. Ecological Indicators 29: 34–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen, R., 1979. Sigmeten und Geosigmeten, ihre Ordnung und ihre Bedentung für Wissenschaft, Naturschutz und Plannung. Biogeog. The Haque-Boston-London 16: 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuorio, K., L. Lepistö & A.-L. Holopainen, 2007. Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analyses. Boreal Environment Research 12: 561–569.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is a result of the project ‘Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support river basin management plans’ supported by a grant from Norway through the Norwegian Financial Mechanism within the frame of the Polish-Norwegian Research Fund (PNRF-220-AI-1/07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Kolada.

Additional information

Guest editors: M. T. Ferreira, M. O’Hare, K. Szoszkiewicz & S. Hellsten / Plants in Hydrosystems: From Functional Ecology to Weed Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolada, A., Ciecierska, H., Ruszczyńska, J. et al. Sampling techniques and inter-surveyor variability as sources of uncertainty in Polish macrophyte metric for lake ecological status assessment. Hydrobiologia 737, 265–279 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1591-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1591-9

Keywords

Navigation