Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Abiotic factors affect microhabitat selection and community dynamics in a sandy-bottom lotic chironomid midge assemblage

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has established that there is a relationship between lotic macroinvertebrates and environmental variables; however, the sample is frequently large with a coarse mesh size, or sampling is broad in scope. My working hypothesis was that microhabitat variability affects habitat choice and community structure of larval chironomid midges, examined at a scale close to organismal size. Small benthic cores were taken monthly and divided vertically into 1 cm sections. Midge larvae were extracted from each section, and 14 environmental variables were assessed for each section. Partial canonical correspondence analysis indicated that a number of species showed unique microhabitat preferences. The species–environment relation was strong, in which several environmental variables contributed significantly to patterns of midge habitat structure, most notably current, depth in the sediment, and certain sediment fractions. This research demonstrated that small macroinvertebrates are selective in choosing microhabitats, measured at the rarely examined small scale close to organismal size, in a simple homogeneous sandy environment. Precision in defining an organism’s microhabitat can help us better to understand species habitat choices with a view to improve understanding of species interrelationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 1995. Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edn, EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.

  • Bazzanti, M., 2000. Ecological requirements of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) on the soft bottom of the River Arrone, central Italy. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15: 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braccia, A. & J. R. Voshell Jr., 2006. Environmental factors accounting for benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure at the sample scale in streams subjected to a gradient of cattle grazing. Hydrobiologia 573: 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P., 1989. Factors that determine the species richness of lotic communities of Chironomidae. Acta Biologica Debrecina Oecologica Hungarica 3: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P., 1995. Conclusions. In Armitage, P., P. S. Cranston & L. C. V. Pinder (eds), The Chironomidae: The Biology and Ecology of Non-Biting Midges. Chapman and Hall, London: 436–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S. S. & A. S. Melo, 2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia 598: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Death, R. G. & M. K. Joy, 2004. Invertebrate community structure in streams of the Manawatu-Wanganui region, New Zealand: the roles of catchment versus reach scale influences. Freshwater Biology 49: 982–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epler, J. H., 2001. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. Version 1.0. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Special Publication SJ2001-SP13, Raleigh, NC. http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/BAUwww/Chironomid.html.

  • Erman, D. C. & N. A. Erman, 1984. The response of stream macroinvertebrates to substrate size and heterogeneity. Hydrobiologia 108: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, M. D., J. G. Pilkington, R. P. McBlane & S. P. Rushton, 2005. Macroinvertebrate species and assemblages in the headwater streams of the River Tyne, northern England in relation to land cover and other environmental variables. Hydrobiologia 544: 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrington, L. C., 2008. Global diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae; Insecta-Diptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, H. S., C. C. Vaughn & C. K. Meier, 2008. Environmental variables interact across spatial scales to structure trichopteran assemblages in Ouachita Mountain rivers. Hydrobiologia 596: 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren (eds), 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. & V. H. Resh, 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecology – the benefits of genus- and species-level identifications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20(2): 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. J., 1969. Aquatic insect communities of a small stream on Mont St. Hilaire, Quebec. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26(5): 1157–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins & M. B. Berg (eds), 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th ed. Kendall-Hunt Publ. Co., Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. A., P. Arensburger, A. P. Martin & D. W. Denman, 1996. Disturbance and patch-specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris and floods on lotic invertebrates. Oecologia 105: 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W., 1988. Ecology of freshwater meiofauna. In Higgins, R. P. & H. Thiel (eds), Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC: 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, A. & J. M. Svensson, 2006. Vertical distribution of benthic community responses to fish predators, and effects on algae and suspended material. Aquatic Ecology 40: 85–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, L. C. V., 1980. Spatial distribution of Chironomidae in an English chalk stream. In Murray, D. V. (ed.), Chironomidae: Ecology, Systematics, Cytology and Physiology. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, L. C. V., 1986. Biology of freshwater Chironomidae. Annual Review of Entomology 31: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punti, T., M. Rieradevall & N. Prat, 2009. Environmental factors, spatial variation and specific requirements of Chironomidae in Mediterranean reference streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28(1): 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 1985. A multivariate study of resource partitioning in soft bottom lotic Chironomidae. Hydrobiologia 126: 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 1987. The effects of flooding and sediments on the structure of a stream midge assemblage. Hydrobiologia 144: 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 1989. Chironomid midges as indicators of organic pollution in the Scioto River Basin, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 89(1): 5–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 1990. The effect of naturally varying discharge rates on the species richness of lotic midges. Hydrobiologia 196: 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 2004. The colonization response of lotic chironomid larvae to substrate size and heterogeneity. Hydrobiologia 524: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 61: 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. L., 2000. Lotic meiofaunal community dynamics: colonisation, resilience and persistence in a spatially and temporally heterogeneous environment. Freshwater Biology 44: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stribling, J. B., K. L. Pavlik & S. M. Holdsworth, 2008. Data quality, performance, and uncertainty in taxonomic identification for biological assessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27(4): 906–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington, R., A. M. Greenwood, P. J. Wood, P. D. Armitage, J. Gunn & A. L. Robertson, 2009. The response of perennial and temporary headwater stream invertebrate communities to hydrological extremes. Hydrobiologia 630: 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, C. M. & M. A. Palmer, 2000. What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities? Freshwater Biology 44: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Smilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Window’s User’s guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.

  • Thienemann, A., 1954. Chironomus: Leben, Verbreitung und Wirtshaftliche Bedeutung der Chironomiden. Binnengewasser 20. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart: 834 pp.

  • Tokeshi, M., 1994. Biodiversity in aquatic systems: some conceptual and theoretical issues. In Yasunu, M. & M. Watanabe (eds), Biodiversity: Its Complexity and Role. Global Environmental Forum, Tokyo: 211–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M., 1995. Life cycles and population dynamics. In Armitage, P., P. S. Cranston & L. C. V. Pinder (eds), The Chironomidae: The Biology and Ecology of Non-Biting Midges. Chapman & Hall, London: 225–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. M. & K. W. Cummins, 1979. Effects of food quality on growth of a stream detritivore, Paratendipes albimanus (Meigen) (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ecology 60: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1972. The drift of stream insects. Annual Review of Entomology 17: 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiderholm, T. (ed.), 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region, keys and diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 19: 1–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wene, G., 1940. The soil as an ecological factor in the abundance of aquatic chironomid larvae. Ohio Journal of Science 40: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, C. K., 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology 30: 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by grants from the Francis Marion University Professional Development Fund. I would like to thank John Ludlam and Jeff Steinmetz for their comments on the MS and Kirk Dineley for aid with graphing. Big thanks are due to Broughton Caldwell who helped immensely in confirming or correcting identifications. Two anonymous reviewers helped refine the manuscript. Finally, my greatest thanks go to Susan for her steadfast help in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC, 29502, USA

    John G. Rae

Authors
  1. John G. Rae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Rae.

Additional information

Handling editor: Nuria Bonada

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rae, J.G. Abiotic factors affect microhabitat selection and community dynamics in a sandy-bottom lotic chironomid midge assemblage. Hydrobiologia 700, 121–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1223-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1223-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation